How Electrical Storms Recur Over Time in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators - Subanalysis of the Nippon Storm Study -

被引:0
|
作者
Yasuoka, Ryobun [1 ]
Maruyama, Masahiro [1 ]
Nakazawa, Gaku [1 ]
Noda, Takashi [2 ]
Nitta, Takashi [3 ]
Aizawa, Yoshifusa [4 ]
Ohe, Tohru [5 ]
Kurita, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kindai Univ Hosp, Div Cardiol, 377-2 Ohno Higashi, Osaka 5898511, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Sendai, Japan
[3] Hanyu Gen Hosp, Saitama, Japan
[4] Tachikawa Med Ctr, Dept Res & Dev, Niigata, Japan
[5] Okayama City Hosp, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Electrical storm; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Primary prevention; Recurrent event analysis; CARDIAC-RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA; CATHETER ABLATION; MANAGEMENT; DEATH; TERM; PHARMACOTHERAPY; PREVENTION; PREDICTORS; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0390
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Electrical storms (E-storms), defined as multiple fatal ventricular arrhythmias over a short period, negatively affect the prognosis of patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (ICD/ CRT-D). However, the prognostic impact of recurrent E-storms has not been well elucidated. Methods and Results: We analyzed the association between E-storm recurrences and mortality using data from 1,274 participants in the Nippon Storm Study, a prospective observational study conducted at 48 ICD/CRT-D centers in Japan. Differences in E-storm recurrences by patient characteristics were evaluated using the mean cumulative function (MCF), which is the cumulative number of E-storm episodes per patient as a function of time. Patients with multiple E-storms had a 3.39-fold higher mortality risk than those without E-storms (95% confidence interval 1.82-6.28; P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between patients with a single E-storm and those without E-storms. The MCF curve exhibited a slower ascent in patients who received primary prevention ICD/CRT-D than in those who received secondary prevention ICD/CRT-D. However, when analyzing only patients with E-storms, the MCF curves demonstrated comparable trajectories in both groups. Conclusions: E-storm recurrences may have a negative impact on prognosis. Once patients with primary prevention experience an E-storm episode, they face a similar risk of subsequent recurrent E-storms as patients with secondary prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 223
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electrical storms in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Primary vs. secondary prophylaxis
    Tint, Diana
    Micu, Sorin
    Petris, Antoniu
    MOLECULAR CRYSTALS AND LIQUID CRYSTALS, 2016, 628 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [42] Healthcare utilization in patients with first-time implantable cardioverter defibrillators (data from the WEBCARE study)
    Broers, Eva R.
    Lodder, Paul
    Spek, Viola R. M.
    Widdershoven, Jos W. M. G.
    Pedersen, Susanne S.
    Habibovic, Mirela
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (04): : 439 - 446
  • [43] Efficacy of antitachycardia pacing alert by remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for out-of-hospital electrical storm
    Otsuki, Sou
    Izumi, Daisuke
    Sakaguchi, Yuta
    Suzuki, Naomasa
    Hakamata, Takahiro
    Ikami, Yasuhiro
    Hasegawa, Yuki
    Yagihara, Nobue
    Iijima, Kenichi
    Chinushi, Masaomi
    Minamino, Tohru
    Takayuki, Inomata
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (10): : 1675 - 1682
  • [44] Perceptions of Singaporean patients living with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: an exploratory qualitative study
    Ooi, Sim Leng
    Seah, Betsy
    Wu, Vivien Xi
    Koh, Karen Wei Ling
    Jiao, Nana
    He, Hong-Gu
    Wang, Wenru
    HEART & LUNG, 2018, 47 (04): : 329 - 336
  • [45] Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with long QT syndrome: a multicentre study
    Zienciuk-Krajka, Agnieszka
    Sterlinski, Made
    Filipecki, Artur
    Owczuk, Radoslaw
    Bednarek, Jacek
    Kempa, Made
    Sielski, Slawomir
    Dziduszko, Marcin
    Mitkowski, Przemyslaw
    Kazmierczak, Jaroslaw
    Kusnierz, Jacek
    Michalkiewicz, Dariusz
    Stec, Sebastian M.
    Gulaj, Marcin
    Majcherek, Ryszard
    Lubinski, Andrzej
    Raczak, Grzegorz
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2018, 76 (12) : 1687 - 1696
  • [46] Electrical storms in patients with implantable defibrillators: Results from shock inhibition evaluation with azimilide (Shield)
    Hohnloser, S
    Goethe-Univ, JW
    Dorian, P
    Al-Khalidi, H
    Brum, J
    Tatla, D
    Pratt, C
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (17) : U552 - U552
  • [47] Catheter ablation for the treatment of electrical storm in patients with Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators - Short- and long-term outcomes in a prospective single-center study
    Carbucicchio, Corrado
    Santamaria, Matteo
    Trevisi, Nicola
    Maccabelli, Giuseppe
    Giraldi, Francesco
    Fassini, Gaetano
    Riva, Stefania
    Moltrasio, Massimo
    Cireddu, Manuela
    Veglia, Fabrizio
    Della Bella, Paolo
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (04) : 462 - 469
  • [48] Electromagnetic interference by transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with bipolar sensing implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A pilot safety study
    Crevenna, R
    Stix, G
    Pleiner, J
    Pezawas, T
    Schmidinger, H
    Quittan, M
    Wolzt, M
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (02): : 626 - 629
  • [49] Causes of sudden death in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Insights from the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study
    Syed, J
    Newman, DM
    Connolly, SJ
    Dorian, P
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 165 - 165
  • [50] Propranolol Versus Metoprolol for Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
    Chatzidou, Sofia
    Kontogiannis, Christos
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
    Georgiopoulos, Georgios
    Kosmopoulos, Marinos
    Papadopoulou, Elektra
    Vasilopoulos, Georgios
    Rokas, Stylianos
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (17) : 1897 - 1906