The Impact of L4-L5 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on 2-Year Adjacent-level Parameters

被引:0
|
作者
Bakare, Adewale [1 ]
Alvarado, Anthony M. [2 ]
Coelho, Vicente [3 ]
Varela, Jesus R. [1 ]
Reine, Gibson J. [1 ]
Mazza, Jacob [1 ]
Fontes, Ricardo B. V. [1 ]
Deutsch, Harel [1 ]
O'Toole, John E. [1 ]
Fessler, Richard G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Kansas City, KS USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Coll Med, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Adjacent level; Adjacent segment degeneration; Disc angle; Index level; Lumbar lordosis; Segmental lordosis; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES; SEGMENT DISEASE; ALIGNMENT; LORDOSIS; CAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.041
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study evaluates the impact of L4-L5 minimally invasive surgery (MIS)- transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent-level parameters. Methods: This is a retrospective study performed on consecutive patients between January 2015 and December 2019. The index- and adjacent-level segmental lordosis (SL) and disc angle (DA) were measured. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and at 3-24 months postoperatively. Factors influencing changes in adjacent-level parameters and the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) were assessed. Results: A total of 117 adult patients, averaging 65.5 years of age and slight preponderance of female (56.4%), were analyzed. L4-L5 SL decreased at 2 years (P < 0.05), but L4-L5 DA significantly increased at all timepoints (P < 0.05). While L3-L4 SL and DA significantly decreased at all timepoints (P < 0.05), L5-S1 SL decreased at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.05) and L5-S1 DA only significantly decreased at 2 years (P < 0.05). All PROs improved significantly (P < 0.0001). The ASDeg rate was 19.7% at 2.2 years. Cephalad and caudal ASDeg rates were 12.0% and 10.3%, respectively. Eight patients (6.8%) required adjacent-level reoperations, mainly at L3-L4 (6 cases). The use of expandable cage significantly reduced the odds of caudal ASDeg (OR 0.15, P = 0.037), but had no significant effect on cephalad ASDeg. Conclusions: L4-L5 MIS-TLIF had a more consistent effect on L3-L4 than L5-S1. Although adjacent-level SL and DA decreased over time, their association with ASDeg appears limited, suggesting a multifactorial etiology. L4-L5 MIS-TLIF provides demonstrable clinical benefits with lasting PRO improvements and low adjacent-level reoperations.
引用
收藏
页码:E109 / E120
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Spondylosis: 5-year Results
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Sung, Na Young
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (06) : 1813 - 1823
  • [22] Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Yee, Timothy J.
    Terman, Samuel W.
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (10) : 1796 - 1801
  • [23] Prognostic Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After L4-L5 Lumbar Fusion
    Maragkos, Georgios A.
    Atesok, Kivanc
    Papavassiliou, Efstathios
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 86 (06) : 835 - 842
  • [24] The Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Single Level Fusion
    Kim, Moon-Chan
    Chung, Hung-Tae
    Kim, Dong-Jun
    Kim, Sang-Hyuk
    Jeon, Sang-Ho
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (02) : 111 - 116
  • [25] Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    He, Da
    He, Wei
    Tian, Wei
    Liu, Bo
    Liu, Yajun
    Sun, Yuqing
    Xing, Yonggang
    Lang, Zhao
    Wang, Yumei
    Ma, Tengfei
    Liu, Mingming
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (06) : 1477 - 1487
  • [26] Does L4-L5 Pose Additional Neurologic Risk in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Salzmann, Stephan N.
    Shirahata, Toshiyuki
    Okano, Ichiro
    Winter, Fabian
    Sax, Oliver C.
    Yang, Jingyan
    Shue, Jennifer
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Girard, Federico P.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 129 : E337 - E342
  • [27] Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 - An anatomic evaluation and approach classification
    Kleeman, TJ
    Ahn, UM
    Clutterbuck, WB
    Campbell, CJ
    Talbot-Kleeman, A
    SPINE, 2002, 27 (13) : 1390 - 1395
  • [28] Evaluation of retraction time as a predictor of postoperative motor dysfunction after minimally invasive transpsoas interbody fusion at L4-L5
    Mueller, Kyle
    McGowan, Jason
    Kane, Stephen
    Voyadzis, Jean-Marc
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 61 : 124 - 129
  • [29] Spondylolisthesis with Uncommon Congenital Deformity of L4-L5 Vertebral Fusion Treated by Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Cheng, Cheng
    Wang, Kai
    Zhang, Can
    Wu, Hao
    Jian, Feng-zeng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : 222 - 226
  • [30] Commentary: Prognostic Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After L4-L5 Lumbar Fusion
    Abbatematteo, Joseph M.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 86 (06) : E528 - E528