Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

被引:48
|
作者
Yee, Timothy J. [1 ]
Terman, Samuel W. [1 ]
La Marca, Frank [1 ]
Park, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurosurg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Adjacent segment disease; Minimally invasive; Spine surgery; TLIF; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; FACET VIOLATION; RISK-FACTORS; DEGENERATION; DISC; MINIMUM; STENOSIS; LEVEL; SPINE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a potential long-term risk after lumbar fusion. Its incidence has been evaluated in anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusions, but few studies have focused on transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Relative risk of ASD with open or minimally invasive (MI) TLIF is poorly understood. To report our experience with risk for ASD in patients receiving TLIF and test its association with surgical approach, we performed a retrospective cohort study based on medical record review at a single institution. Eligible patients were >= 18 years old at operation, underwent single-level TLIF during the period 2007-2008, and had at least 6 months postoperative follow-up. Patients were categorized by surgical approach (open versus MI). Primary outcome of interest was development of symptomatic ASD, defined by (1) new back and/or leg pain, (2) imaging findings adjacent to original surgical level, and (3) decision to treat. A total of 68 patients (16 open, 52 MI) were included in the analysis. Groups had similar baseline characteristics, except the open group tended to be older (p = 0.04). Seven (10%) patients developed ASD. Mean patient age was 62 years and three were male. Three underwent open and four underwent MI TLIF. Risk of ASD did not differ significantly by surgical approach. The MI group showed a trend toward decreased risk of ASD compared to the open group, although it was not statistically significant. This suggests MI TLIF may be associated with decreased long-term morbidity compared to the open approach. Large prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1796 / 1801
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: incidence and risk factors
    Yuan, Chao
    Zhou, Jing
    Wang, Liran
    Deng, Zhongliang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [2] Adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: incidence and risk factors
    Chao Yuan
    Jing Zhou
    Liran Wang
    Zhongliang Deng
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [3] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Easley, Kirk
    Lee, Jun-Seok
    Hong, Jae-Young
    Virk, Michael
    Hsieh, Patrick C.
    Yoon, Sangwook T.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 143S - 150S
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease after Posterior Lumbar Fusion
    Ma, Jian-jun
    Fan, Shun-wu
    Zhao, Feng-dong
    Fang, Xiang-qian
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 6 (01) : 78 - 79
  • [5] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Won-chul
    Park, Jeong-Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 85 : 236 - 243
  • [6] Comparison of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Minimally Invasive or Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
    Jia, Jun
    Chen, Cong
    Wang, Peng
    Wang, Lianlei
    Liu, Xinyu
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (01): : E45 - E50
  • [7] Indirect Effects on Adjacent Segments After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Singhatanadgige, Weerasak
    Suranaowarat, Piti
    Jaruprat, Peeradon
    Kerr, Stephen J.
    Tanasansomboon, Teerachat
    Limthongkul, Worawat
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E717 - E725
  • [8] Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease
    Xuelei Zhang
    Yu Zhang
    Zuchao Gu
    Guo Li
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [9] Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
    Xie Lei
    Wu WenJian
    Liang Yu
    Department of Orthopedics Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases with Integrated ChineseWestern Medicine Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2016, (16) : 1969 - 1986
  • [10] Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
    Xie, Lei
    Wu, Wen-Jian
    Liang, Yu
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (16) : 1969 - +