Comparing an Advanced Monofocal With a Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Using a Mini-Monovision Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Zeilinger, Johannes [1 ]
Kronschlaeger, Martin [1 ]
Schlatter, Andreas [1 ]
Georgiev, Stefan [1 ]
Ruiss, Manuel [1 ]
Pilwachs, Caroline [1 ]
Findl, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanusch Hosp, Karl Landsteiner Inst, Vienna Inst Res Ocular Surg VIROS, Vienna, Austria
关键词
CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; VISUAL-ACUITY; VISION; IMPLANTATION; RANGE; DOMINANCE; SURGERY; QUALITY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.014
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To compare interindividual differences in visual performance of an advanced monofocal with a non- diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) using a mini-monovision approach. center dot DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, controlled, double- masked study. center dot METHODS: In total, 48 patients (96 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. One group received an advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E (RayOne EMV; Rayner) and the other group a non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity; Alcon) in both eyes. Target refraction for both groups was mini-monovision. After 3 months, monocular and binocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA), intermediate (DCIVA/UIVA), and near visual acuity (DCNVA/UNVA); contrast sensitivity; binocular defocus curves; halometry; and Quality of Vision questionnaire scores were compared. center dot RESULTS: Binocular mean CDVA, DCIVA at 66 cm, and DCNVA at 40 cm were-0.10 +/- 0.10, 0.15 +/- 0.11, and 0.32 +/- 0.16 logMAR for the RAO200E and- 0.10 +/- 0.10, 0.12 +/- 0.10, and 0.27 +/- 0.16 logMAR for the DFT015, respectively, with no significant difference. A significant difference could be shown for the dominant eye in monocular DCIVA and DCNVA and for the dominant and nondominant eye in monocular UNVA, with 0.28 +/- 0.14, 0.48 +/- 0.22, 0.46 +/- 0.21, and 0.41 +/- 0.20 log- MAR for the RAO200E and 0.14 +/- 0.10 ( P = .023), 0.35 +/- 0.16 ( P = .008), 0.30 +/- 0.14 ( P = .001), and 0.21 +/- 0.10 ( P = .003) logMAR for the DFT015, respectively. Significantly smaller halo size in the RAO200E group and significantly better distance-corrected defocus curve at-2.5 ( P = .031),-2.0 ( P = .03), and-1 diopters ( P = .03) of defocus in the DFT015 group could be shown. center dot CONCLUSIONS: Distance corrected or uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate, and near distance between the advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E and the non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015, when compared in a mini-monovision setting, showed no significant differences. (Am J Ophthalmol 2025;271: 86-95. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/))
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 95
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cases of replacing diffractive bifocal intraocular lens with extended depth of focus intraocular lens due to waxy vision
    Takabatake, Ryu
    Takahashi, Makiko
    Yoshimoto, Takuya
    Higashijima, Fumiaki
    Kobayashi, Yuka
    Yamashiro, Chiemi
    Kimura, Kazuhiro
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [42] Evaluation of Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes, Spectacle Dependence after Bilateral Implantation with a Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Compared to Other Intraocular Lenses
    Dolowiec-Kwapisz, Anna
    Piotrowska, Halina
    Misiuk-Hojlo, Marta
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (17)
  • [43] Comparative Visual Outcome Analysis of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens and a New Diffractive Multifocal Lens with Extended Depth of Focus
    Moshirfar, Majid
    Stapley, Seth R.
    Corbin, Wyatt M.
    Bundogji, Nour
    Conley, Matthew
    Darquea, Ines M.
    Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
    Hoopes, Phillip C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (24)
  • [44] Design of double-zone aspheric diffractive intraocular lens with extended depth of focus
    边亚燕
    刘永基
    姜来
    Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16 (09) : 81 - 88
  • [45] Design of double-zone aspheric diffractive intraocular lens with extended depth of focus
    Bian, Yayan
    Liu, Yongji
    Jiang, Lai
    CHINESE OPTICS LETTERS, 2018, 16 (09)
  • [46] Unilateral intraindividual comparison and bilateral performance of a monofocal spherical and diffractive extended depth of field intraocular lens mix-and-match approach
    Wendelstein, Jascha A.
    Casazza, Marina
    Reifeltshammer, Sophia
    Riaz, Kamran
    Pantanelli, Seth
    Mariacher, Siegfried
    Seiler, Theo G.
    Kohnen, Thomas
    Bolz, Matthias
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 52 (01): : 31 - 41
  • [47] Clinical Outcomes of a Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus IOL in Eyes with Mild Glaucoma
    Ferguson, Tanner J.
    Wilson, Caroline W.
    Shafer, Brian M.
    Berdahl, John P.
    Terveen, Daniel C.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 861 - 868
  • [48] Difference in Quality of Vision Outcome among Extended Depth of Focus, Bifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation
    Chao, Chen-Cheng
    Lin, Hung-Yuan
    Lee, Chia-Yi
    Mai, Elsa Lin-Chin
    Lian, Ie-Bin
    Chang, Chao-Kai
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [49] Comparison of dynamic defocus curve on cataract patients implanting extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lens
    Wu, Tingyi
    Wang, Yuexin
    Yu, Jiazhi
    Ren, Xiaotong
    Li, Yuanting
    Qiu, Weiqiang
    Li, Xuemin
    EYE AND VISION, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [50] Comparison of dynamic defocus curve on cataract patients implanting extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lens
    Tingyi Wu
    Yuexin Wang
    Jiazhi Yu
    Xiaotong Ren
    Yuanting Li
    Weiqiang Qiu
    Xuemin Li
    Eye and Vision, 10