Comparing an Advanced Monofocal With a Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Using a Mini-Monovision Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Zeilinger, Johannes [1 ]
Kronschlaeger, Martin [1 ]
Schlatter, Andreas [1 ]
Georgiev, Stefan [1 ]
Ruiss, Manuel [1 ]
Pilwachs, Caroline [1 ]
Findl, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanusch Hosp, Karl Landsteiner Inst, Vienna Inst Res Ocular Surg VIROS, Vienna, Austria
关键词
CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; VISUAL-ACUITY; VISION; IMPLANTATION; RANGE; DOMINANCE; SURGERY; QUALITY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.014
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To compare interindividual differences in visual performance of an advanced monofocal with a non- diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) using a mini-monovision approach. center dot DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, controlled, double- masked study. center dot METHODS: In total, 48 patients (96 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. One group received an advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E (RayOne EMV; Rayner) and the other group a non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity; Alcon) in both eyes. Target refraction for both groups was mini-monovision. After 3 months, monocular and binocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA), intermediate (DCIVA/UIVA), and near visual acuity (DCNVA/UNVA); contrast sensitivity; binocular defocus curves; halometry; and Quality of Vision questionnaire scores were compared. center dot RESULTS: Binocular mean CDVA, DCIVA at 66 cm, and DCNVA at 40 cm were-0.10 +/- 0.10, 0.15 +/- 0.11, and 0.32 +/- 0.16 logMAR for the RAO200E and- 0.10 +/- 0.10, 0.12 +/- 0.10, and 0.27 +/- 0.16 logMAR for the DFT015, respectively, with no significant difference. A significant difference could be shown for the dominant eye in monocular DCIVA and DCNVA and for the dominant and nondominant eye in monocular UNVA, with 0.28 +/- 0.14, 0.48 +/- 0.22, 0.46 +/- 0.21, and 0.41 +/- 0.20 log- MAR for the RAO200E and 0.14 +/- 0.10 ( P = .023), 0.35 +/- 0.16 ( P = .008), 0.30 +/- 0.14 ( P = .001), and 0.21 +/- 0.10 ( P = .003) logMAR for the DFT015, respectively. Significantly smaller halo size in the RAO200E group and significantly better distance-corrected defocus curve at-2.5 ( P = .031),-2.0 ( P = .03), and-1 diopters ( P = .03) of defocus in the DFT015 group could be shown. center dot CONCLUSIONS: Distance corrected or uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate, and near distance between the advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E and the non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015, when compared in a mini-monovision setting, showed no significant differences. (Am J Ophthalmol 2025;271: 86-95. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/))
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 95
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis and comparison of monofocal, extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lens profiles
    Miret, Juan J.
    Camps, Vicente J.
    Garcia, Celia
    Caballero, Maria T.
    Gonzalez-Leal, Juan M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [32] Analysis and comparison of monofocal, extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lens profiles
    Juan J. Miret
    Vicente J. Camps
    Celia García
    Maria T. Caballero
    Juan M. Gonzalez-Leal
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [33] Extended depth of focus intraocular lens versus a new monofocal intraocular lens: A prospective comparative and interventional study
    Sihmar, Yogika
    Singh, Basant K.
    Singh, Vinod K.
    Kumar, Santosh
    Chaudhary, Aparajita
    Saini, Sanchita
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 37 (04) : 331 - 336
  • [34] Visual performance, light distortion and patient reported outcomes with a new bi-aspheric non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens
    Tana-Sanz, Santiago
    Tana-Sanz, Pedro
    Elvira-Giner, Belen
    Orts-Vila, Paz
    Tana-Rivero, Pedro
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [35] Visual performance and photic disturbances with diffractive and nondiffractive EDOF intraocular lenses using mini-monovision: randomized trial
    Fernandes, Marcelo Caram
    Nunomura, Carlos Yuji
    Messias, Andre
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 50 (02): : 153 - 159
  • [36] Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens
    Hafez, Tarek Abdelrazek
    Helaly, Hany Ahmed
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 13 : 2111 - 2117
  • [37] Clinical outcomes of a monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function compared with an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens
    Lee, Jae Hyuck
    Moon, Su Young
    Chung, Ho Seok
    Park, So Young
    Lee, Hun
    Kim, Jae Yong
    Tchah, Hungwon
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (01): : 61 - 66
  • [38] Visual Outcomes Following Non-Diffractive Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients with Epiretinal Membrane in One Eye and Bilateral Cataracts
    Sararols, Laura
    Guarro, Merce
    Vazquez, Meritxell
    Ruiz, Sergi
    Lopez, Elena
    Biarnes, Marc
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [39] Effect of minimonovision in bilateral implantation of a novel non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: Defocus curves, visual outcomes, and quality of life
    Coassin, Marco
    Mori, Tommaso
    Di Zazzo, Antonio
    Poddi, Maria
    Sgrulletta, Roberto
    Napolitano, Pasquale
    Bonini, Stefano
    Orfeo, Vincenzo
    Kohnen, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (05) : 2942 - 2948
  • [40] Clinical Outcomes after Bilateral Implantation of a Wavefront-Shaping Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOL with Mini-Monovision
    Won, Yeo Kyoung
    Choi, Sung Ho
    Chung, Tae-Young
    Lim, Dong Hui
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (11)