Comparing an Advanced Monofocal With a Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Using a Mini-Monovision Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Zeilinger, Johannes [1 ]
Kronschlaeger, Martin [1 ]
Schlatter, Andreas [1 ]
Georgiev, Stefan [1 ]
Ruiss, Manuel [1 ]
Pilwachs, Caroline [1 ]
Findl, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanusch Hosp, Karl Landsteiner Inst, Vienna Inst Res Ocular Surg VIROS, Vienna, Austria
关键词
CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; VISUAL-ACUITY; VISION; IMPLANTATION; RANGE; DOMINANCE; SURGERY; QUALITY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.014
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To compare interindividual differences in visual performance of an advanced monofocal with a non- diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) using a mini-monovision approach. center dot DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, controlled, double- masked study. center dot METHODS: In total, 48 patients (96 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. One group received an advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E (RayOne EMV; Rayner) and the other group a non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity; Alcon) in both eyes. Target refraction for both groups was mini-monovision. After 3 months, monocular and binocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA), intermediate (DCIVA/UIVA), and near visual acuity (DCNVA/UNVA); contrast sensitivity; binocular defocus curves; halometry; and Quality of Vision questionnaire scores were compared. center dot RESULTS: Binocular mean CDVA, DCIVA at 66 cm, and DCNVA at 40 cm were-0.10 +/- 0.10, 0.15 +/- 0.11, and 0.32 +/- 0.16 logMAR for the RAO200E and- 0.10 +/- 0.10, 0.12 +/- 0.10, and 0.27 +/- 0.16 logMAR for the DFT015, respectively, with no significant difference. A significant difference could be shown for the dominant eye in monocular DCIVA and DCNVA and for the dominant and nondominant eye in monocular UNVA, with 0.28 +/- 0.14, 0.48 +/- 0.22, 0.46 +/- 0.21, and 0.41 +/- 0.20 log- MAR for the RAO200E and 0.14 +/- 0.10 ( P = .023), 0.35 +/- 0.16 ( P = .008), 0.30 +/- 0.14 ( P = .001), and 0.21 +/- 0.10 ( P = .003) logMAR for the DFT015, respectively. Significantly smaller halo size in the RAO200E group and significantly better distance-corrected defocus curve at-2.5 ( P = .031),-2.0 ( P = .03), and-1 diopters ( P = .03) of defocus in the DFT015 group could be shown. center dot CONCLUSIONS: Distance corrected or uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate, and near distance between the advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E and the non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015, when compared in a mini-monovision setting, showed no significant differences. (Am J Ophthalmol 2025;271: 86-95. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/))
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 95
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Outcomes of a New Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Targeted for Mini-Monovision
    Tomagova, Nikola
    Elahi, Sina
    Vandekerckhove, Kristof
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 981 - 990
  • [2] Visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus toric intraocular lens using a mini-monovision approach
    Lee, Mun Wai
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [3] Outcomes of mini-monovision with monofocal, enhanced monofocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses
    Levy, Issac
    Shah, Rachana Prashant
    Mukhija, Ritika
    Nanavaty, Mayank A.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [4] Comparative Study Between Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
    Kandavel, Rom
    Colvard, Michael
    Dredge, Justin
    Bayle, Michael
    Alam, Tamanna
    Snyder, James
    Hall, Brad
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 1161 - 1168
  • [5] Visual Performance of Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus and Neutral Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
    O'Rourke, Tara
    Pantanelli, Seth
    Bolognia, Olga
    Longenecker, Amy
    Lehman, Erik
    Scruggs, Kathleen
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [6] Clinical Experience with a New Non-Diffractive Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens
    Reus, Nic J.
    Kooijman-de Groot, Marjolein J. C.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2021, 99 : 42 - 42
  • [7] Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens
    Beiko, George H. H.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (01): : 48 - 55
  • [8] Clinical Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of an Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Targeted for Mini-Monovision
    Campos, Nuno
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 18 : 1607 - 1613
  • [9] Moderate monovision with monofocal intraocular lenses vs mini-monovision with a small-aperture intraocular lens: a comparative analysis
    Bezerra, Bernardo de Padua Soares
    Beltz, Jacqueline
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 47 : 46 - 46
  • [10] Visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of pseudophakic mini-monovision using a new monofocal intraocular lens
    Ella SeoYeon Park
    Hyunmin Ahn
    Sung Uk Han
    Ikhyun Jun
    Kyoung Yul Seo
    Eung Kweon Kim
    Tae-im Kim
    Scientific Reports, 12