Analysis of the surprise question as a tool for predicting death in neonates

被引:0
|
作者
Asenjo, Silvia [1 ]
Soler-Garcia, Aleix [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Morillo-Palomo, Ana [3 ]
Habimana-Jordana, Anna [1 ]
Guillen, Montserrat [4 ]
Bolance, Catalina [4 ]
Navarro-Vilarrubi, Sergi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp St Joan Deu, Dept Pediat Palliat Care, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp St Joan Deu, Pediat Dept, Passeig St Joan Deu 2, Barcelona 08950, Spain
[3] St Joan Deu Hosp, Neonatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Dept Econometr Stat & Appl Econ, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Inst Recerca St Joan Deu, Infect Dis & Microbiome Res Grp, Esplugas de Llobregat, Spain
[6] Univ Barcelona, Dept Cirurgia & Especialitats Medicoquirurg, Fac Med & Ciencies Salut, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Palliative care; Surprise Question; Neonatology; Predictor factor; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The Surprise Question "Would you be surprised if the patient died in the next 12 months?" lacks pediatric research, particularly in neonatal patients. Our study aims to analyze the Surprise Question's predictive ability in neonates and explore pediatricians' views on palliative care patient identification. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2021 to June 2023, including all newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a pediatric tertiary hospital and its pediatricians. Patients with less than a year since admission were excluded from final analyses. Recorded variables included patient demographics and condition, pediatricians' profile and opinions regarding the Surprise Question, and palliative care patient identification. The Surprise Question was formulated to one or more pediatricians per neonate at admission, 7 days of life, and 28 days of life, with patient status recorded after 12 months to elaborate a confusion matrix of prognostic test results. A total of 51 pediatricians participated. Most felt they had limited criteria for identifying palliative care patients (55%), believed the Surprise Question could be useful (77%), and predicted death (75%). The Surprise Question was answered at least in one out of the three moments for 262 neonates (61% male and at least 36% preterm), with sufficient sample at each moment to study its predictive ability. High negative predictive values were consistent, with higher positive predictive value at 7 days (26%). Conclusions The Surprise Question is a promising tool for predicting neonatal outcome and could guide professionals in initiating palliative care discussions. The 7-day mark appears more suitable for this application. What is Known: Previous research has established the Surprise Question as a valuable tool for predicting death in adults. However, limited research exists on its use in pediatric patients and its role remains unexplored in the neonatal period. What is New: The study evaluates the Surprise Question as a tool for predicting death within the first year of life when applied in the neonatal period. It offers insights into its predictive ability and most suitable time for its application. This study sheds light on its applicability in neonatal care, offering a valuable tool for early identification and referral to palliative care.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] "Surprise question", malnutrition, frailty, and health-related quality of life in predicting mortality in a cohort of haemodialysis patients
    Shoji, Tetsuo
    Mori, Katsuhito
    Nakatani, Shinya
    Morioka, Tomoaki
    Fujii, Hisaka
    Kimura, Seiichi
    Kabata, Daijiro
    Emoto, Masanori
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 39 : I1484 - I1484
  • [42] PREDICTING 90-DAY MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH DECOMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS USING THE "SURPRISE QUESTION": A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    Li, Lucinda
    Yun, Justin
    Zeng, Chengbo
    Indriolo, Teresa
    Kaplan, Alyson
    Mason, Nancy
    Rowland, Michaela
    Engel, Kirsten
    Kavalieratos, Dio
    Pintro, Kedie
    Horick, Nora
    Edelen, Maria
    El-Jawahri, Areej
    Ouchi, Kei
    Ufere, Nneka
    HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 78 : S1761 - S1762
  • [43] Validation of the Surprise Question and the Development of a Multivariable Model
    Davis, Mellar
    Vanenkevort, Erin
    Young, Amanda
    Wojtowicz, Mark
    Lagerman, Braxton
    Gupta, Mudit
    Adonizio, Christian
    Panikkar, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2023, 65 (05) : 456 - 464
  • [44] "Surprise question", malnutrition, frailty, and health-related quality of life in predicting mortality in a cohort of haemodialysis patients
    Shoji, Tetsuo
    Mori, Katsuhito
    Nakatani, Shinya
    Morioka, Tomoaki
    Fujii, Hisaka
    Kimura, Seiichi
    Kabata, Daijiro
    Emoto, Masanori
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 39
  • [45] Prognostic Significance of the Surprise Question in Cancer Patients
    Moss, Alvin
    Lunney, June
    Culp, Stacey
    Abraham, James
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (02) : 346 - 346
  • [46] Translation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Surprise Question
    de Sousa, Paulo Faria
    Juliao, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (07) : 701 - 701
  • [47] SURPRISE QUESTION IN ADVANCED CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
    Fernandes, Sara Cardoso
    Fonseca, Nuno Moreira
    Magrico, Rita
    Mesquita, Isabel
    Fernandes, Vasco
    Ferreira, Ana Carina
    Nolasco, Fernando
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 35 : 1136 - 1136
  • [48] Usefulness of the Surprise Question on an Inpatient Oncology Service
    Singh, Sarguni
    Rodriguez, Adrian
    Lee, Darrell
    Min, Sung-Joon
    Fischer, Stacy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 35 (11): : 1421 - 1425
  • [49] Prognostic Significance of the "Surprise'' Question in Cancer Patients
    Moss, Alvin H.
    Lunney, June R.
    Culp, Stacey
    Auber, Miklos
    Kurian, Sobha
    Rogers, John
    Dower, Joshua
    Abraham, Jame
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 13 (07) : 837 - 840