Analysis of the surprise question as a tool for predicting death in neonates

被引:0
|
作者
Asenjo, Silvia [1 ]
Soler-Garcia, Aleix [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Morillo-Palomo, Ana [3 ]
Habimana-Jordana, Anna [1 ]
Guillen, Montserrat [4 ]
Bolance, Catalina [4 ]
Navarro-Vilarrubi, Sergi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp St Joan Deu, Dept Pediat Palliat Care, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp St Joan Deu, Pediat Dept, Passeig St Joan Deu 2, Barcelona 08950, Spain
[3] St Joan Deu Hosp, Neonatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Dept Econometr Stat & Appl Econ, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Inst Recerca St Joan Deu, Infect Dis & Microbiome Res Grp, Esplugas de Llobregat, Spain
[6] Univ Barcelona, Dept Cirurgia & Especialitats Medicoquirurg, Fac Med & Ciencies Salut, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Palliative care; Surprise Question; Neonatology; Predictor factor; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The Surprise Question "Would you be surprised if the patient died in the next 12 months?" lacks pediatric research, particularly in neonatal patients. Our study aims to analyze the Surprise Question's predictive ability in neonates and explore pediatricians' views on palliative care patient identification. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2021 to June 2023, including all newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a pediatric tertiary hospital and its pediatricians. Patients with less than a year since admission were excluded from final analyses. Recorded variables included patient demographics and condition, pediatricians' profile and opinions regarding the Surprise Question, and palliative care patient identification. The Surprise Question was formulated to one or more pediatricians per neonate at admission, 7 days of life, and 28 days of life, with patient status recorded after 12 months to elaborate a confusion matrix of prognostic test results. A total of 51 pediatricians participated. Most felt they had limited criteria for identifying palliative care patients (55%), believed the Surprise Question could be useful (77%), and predicted death (75%). The Surprise Question was answered at least in one out of the three moments for 262 neonates (61% male and at least 36% preterm), with sufficient sample at each moment to study its predictive ability. High negative predictive values were consistent, with higher positive predictive value at 7 days (26%). Conclusions The Surprise Question is a promising tool for predicting neonatal outcome and could guide professionals in initiating palliative care discussions. The 7-day mark appears more suitable for this application. What is Known: Previous research has established the Surprise Question as a valuable tool for predicting death in adults. However, limited research exists on its use in pediatric patients and its role remains unexplored in the neonatal period. What is New: The study evaluates the Surprise Question as a tool for predicting death within the first year of life when applied in the neonatal period. It offers insights into its predictive ability and most suitable time for its application. This study sheds light on its applicability in neonatal care, offering a valuable tool for early identification and referral to palliative care.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Question closure to solve the surprise test
    Immerman, Daniel
    SYNTHESE, 2017, 194 (11) : 4583 - 4596
  • [32] Predicting one-year mortality in heart failure using the 'Surprise Question': a prospective pilot study
    Straw, Sam
    Byrom, Rowenna
    Gierula, John
    Paton, Maria F.
    Koshy, Aaron
    Cubbon, Richard
    Drozd, Michael
    Kearney, Mark
    Witte, Klaus K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 (02) : 227 - 234
  • [33] USE OF THE 'SURPRISE QUESTION' IN PREDICTING ADVERSE OUTCOMES AMONG FRAIL OLDER PATIENTS AFTER HOSPITAL ADMISSION
    Gaffney, Laura
    Judge, Conor
    Morrison, Laura
    Costello, Maria
    Robinson, Stephanie
    O'Caoimh, Ronan
    AGE AND AGEING, 2018, 47
  • [34] The future, complexity, death and surprise
    Duhl, L
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (04) : 218 - 218
  • [35] The applicability of the "surprise question" as a prognostic tool in patients with severe chronic comorbidities in a university teaching outpatient setting
    Lin, C. A.
    Pires, P. P.
    Freitas, L. V.
    Reis, P. V. S.
    Silva, F. D.
    Herbst, L. G.
    Nunes, R.
    Lin, C. J.
    Nunes, M. P. T.
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [36] The applicability of the “surprise question” as a prognostic tool in patients with severe chronic comorbidities in a university teaching outpatient setting
    C. A. Lin
    P. P. Pires
    L. V. Freitas
    P. V. S. Reis
    F. D. Silva
    L. G. Herbst
    R. Nunes
    C. J. Lin
    M. P. T. Nunes
    BMC Medical Education, 23
  • [37] Major Challenges for Palliative Care in Oncohematology: Analysis of the "Surprise Question" in a Reference Center
    Orathes Ponte Silva, Alini Maria
    Paim Miranda, Diego Lopes
    Ferreira, David Pereira
    Freitas, Sheila
    Crusoe, Edvan
    Botura Oliveira, Monica Borges
    Silva, Lais Teixeira
    Vieira Lima, Marianna Batista
    Salvino, Marco Aurelio
    BLOOD, 2023, 142
  • [38] Surprise, Surprise. Ambient Media as Promotion Tool for Retailers
    Hutter, Katharina
    Hoffmann, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2014, 90 (01) : 93 - 110
  • [39] Response to "The Surprise Question in Older Hospitalized Patients"
    Lynn, Joanne
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (09) : 1506 - 1506
  • [40] Prognostic significance of the "surprise" question in cancer patients
    Moss, A. H.
    Lunney, J. R.
    Culp, S.
    Auber, M.
    Kurian, S.
    Rogers, J.
    Dower, J.
    Abraham, J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)