Analysis of the surprise question as a tool for predicting death in neonates

被引:0
|
作者
Asenjo, Silvia [1 ]
Soler-Garcia, Aleix [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Morillo-Palomo, Ana [3 ]
Habimana-Jordana, Anna [1 ]
Guillen, Montserrat [4 ]
Bolance, Catalina [4 ]
Navarro-Vilarrubi, Sergi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp St Joan Deu, Dept Pediat Palliat Care, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp St Joan Deu, Pediat Dept, Passeig St Joan Deu 2, Barcelona 08950, Spain
[3] St Joan Deu Hosp, Neonatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Dept Econometr Stat & Appl Econ, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Inst Recerca St Joan Deu, Infect Dis & Microbiome Res Grp, Esplugas de Llobregat, Spain
[6] Univ Barcelona, Dept Cirurgia & Especialitats Medicoquirurg, Fac Med & Ciencies Salut, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Palliative care; Surprise Question; Neonatology; Predictor factor; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The Surprise Question "Would you be surprised if the patient died in the next 12 months?" lacks pediatric research, particularly in neonatal patients. Our study aims to analyze the Surprise Question's predictive ability in neonates and explore pediatricians' views on palliative care patient identification. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2021 to June 2023, including all newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a pediatric tertiary hospital and its pediatricians. Patients with less than a year since admission were excluded from final analyses. Recorded variables included patient demographics and condition, pediatricians' profile and opinions regarding the Surprise Question, and palliative care patient identification. The Surprise Question was formulated to one or more pediatricians per neonate at admission, 7 days of life, and 28 days of life, with patient status recorded after 12 months to elaborate a confusion matrix of prognostic test results. A total of 51 pediatricians participated. Most felt they had limited criteria for identifying palliative care patients (55%), believed the Surprise Question could be useful (77%), and predicted death (75%). The Surprise Question was answered at least in one out of the three moments for 262 neonates (61% male and at least 36% preterm), with sufficient sample at each moment to study its predictive ability. High negative predictive values were consistent, with higher positive predictive value at 7 days (26%). Conclusions The Surprise Question is a promising tool for predicting neonatal outcome and could guide professionals in initiating palliative care discussions. The 7-day mark appears more suitable for this application. What is Known: Previous research has established the Surprise Question as a valuable tool for predicting death in adults. However, limited research exists on its use in pediatric patients and its role remains unexplored in the neonatal period. What is New: The study evaluates the Surprise Question as a tool for predicting death within the first year of life when applied in the neonatal period. It offers insights into its predictive ability and most suitable time for its application. This study sheds light on its applicability in neonatal care, offering a valuable tool for early identification and referral to palliative care.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE "SURPRISE" QUESTION: PREDICTING DEATH OR THE NEED FOR CARE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Romo, R.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2016, 56 : 341 - 342
  • [2] The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Downar, James
    Goldman, Russell
    Pinto, Ruxandra
    Englesakis, Marina
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (13) : E484 - E493
  • [3] The Surprise Question as a Prognostic Tool #360
    Jennings, Kate S.
    Marks, Sean
    Lum, Hillary D.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 21 (10) : 1529 - 1530
  • [4] Predicting transfer to haemodialysis using the peritoneal dialysis surprise question
    Anwaar, Ayesha
    Liu, Sai
    Montez-Rath, Maria
    Neilsen, Hatsumi
    Sun, Sumi
    Abra, Graham
    Schiller, Brigitte
    Hussein, Wael F.
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 44 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [5] The Utility of the Surprise Question in Identifying Patients Most at Risk of Death
    Vick, Judith
    Pertsch, Nathan
    Hutchings, Mathilde
    Neville, Bridget
    Bernacki, Rachelle
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 51 (02) : 342 - 342
  • [6] "SURPRISE QUESTION": IS IT A USEFUL TOOL IN CKD STAGES 4 TO 5?
    Pepe, Bruno
    Prazeres, Teresa
    Carnevale, Andreia
    Calca, Rita
    Matias, Patricia
    Branco, Patricia
    Azeredo-Lopes, Sofia
    Pereira, Sofia Azeredo
    Martins, Ana Rita
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I582 - I582
  • [7] 'The Surprise Question'
    Davis, Mellar P.
    Vanenkevort, Erin
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 12 (04) : 403 - 406
  • [8] The "Surprise" Question
    不详
    DIALYSIS & TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 39 (03) : 87 - 88
  • [9] Usefulness of the surprise question for predicting mortality in advanced heart failure patients
    Munoz, M.
    Calero, E.
    Duran, J.
    Sanchez, V.
    Abellana, R.
    Navas, E.
    Verdu, J. M.
    Torralba, N.
    Argemi, N.
    Casajuana, E.
    Casademunt, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2020, 22 : 77 - 78
  • [10] The Surprise Question in Palliative Care: Does It Have a Role in Predicting Mortality?
    Davis, Mellar P.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 27 (03) : 292 - 293