There is no "Value Penalty" for revision spine surgery: an application of the operative value index for primary versus revision lumbar fusions

被引:0
|
作者
Sarikonda, Advith [1 ]
Glener, Steven [1 ]
Self, D. Mitchell [1 ]
Quraishi, Danyal [2 ]
Sami, Ashmal [1 ]
Keppetipola, Kavantissa M. [1 ]
Amaravadi, Cheritesh R. [1 ]
Isch, Emily L. [3 ]
Heller, Joshua [1 ]
Prasad, Srinivas K. [1 ]
Sharan, Ashwini [1 ]
Jallo, Jack [1 ]
Vaccaro, Alexander R. [4 ]
Harrop, James [1 ]
Clark, Nicholas [5 ]
Sivaganesan, Ahilan [5 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Hosp Neurosci, Dept Neurosurg, 909 Walnut St,2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] NCH, Hosp Special Surg, Naples, FL, Italy
关键词
Revision; Lumbar fusion; TDABC; Operative value index; OVI; COST; COMPLICATIONS; LAMINECTOMY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10143-025-03480-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing prevalence of elective lumbar fusions has been accompanied by a steady rise in revision procedures. Few studies have identified the relative cost-effectiveness of revision lumbar fusion using detailed costing methodology. Here, we aim to compare the "value" (outcomes achieved per dollar spent) of primary versus revision lumbar fusion by integrating time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) with patient-reported outcomes (PROs). 292 patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo elective lumbar fusion. Revision surgery was defined as any case of lumbar fusion after a previous lumbar spine surgery. TDABC was employed to identify intraoperative costs for all cases. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected both preoperatively and at 6-months postoperatively. "Value" was measured through the Operative Value Index (OVI), defined as the percent improvement in ODI per $1,000 spent intraoperatively. Multivariable linear regression, accounting for confounders, was performed to assess whether revision surgery was significantly associated with total cost and OVI. Secondary analyses were performed to compare costs and OVI between primary fusions, revisions for prior decompression and fusion, and revisions for prior decompression alone. The average total cost of a revision fusion was $18,252 +/- $8,496, compared to $18,073 +/- $8,894 for a primary fusion. The average OVI for these groups were 1.79 and 1.65, respectively. On multivariable regression analysis, there were no significant differences in OVI (p = 0.423) or total cost (p = 0.841) between primary and revision cohorts.In the era of value-based care, it is increasingly important for hospitals to identify drivers of variation in the cost-effectiveness of neurosurgical care. By integrating PROs with detailed cost data, we demonstrate that revision lumbar fusions may not significantly differ in cost or value compared to primary fusions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE VALUE OF SKELETAL SCINTIGRAPHY IN PREDICTING THE NEED FOR REVISION SURGERY IN TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT
    HENDERSON, JJ
    BROWN, JDK
    NOBLE, J
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1988, 70 (04): : 681 - 681
  • [42] The value of skeletal scintigraphy in predicting the need for revision surgery in total knee replacement
    Henderson, JJ
    Bamford, DJ
    Noble, J
    Brown, JDK
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 19 (04) : 295 - 299
  • [43] THE VALUE OF REVISION SURGERY AFTER INITIAL AMPUTATION OF AN UPPER OR LOWER-LIMB
    WOOD, MR
    HUNTER, GA
    MILLSTEIN, SG
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 1987, 11 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [44] Skeletal Status in Patients Scheduled for Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery: Comparison of Discectomy, Decompression, Fusion, and Revision
    Schaefer, Christian
    Mafi, Afshin
    Beil, Frank Timo
    Schroeder, Malte
    Rolvien, Tim
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (02) : 380 - 389
  • [45] Updated imaging does not affect revision rates in adults undergoing spine surgery for lumbar degenerative disease
    Ries, Zachary G.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Vasilyev, Ivan
    Metcalfe, Leanne
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 30 (02) : 228 - 233
  • [46] Deep Learning Prediction of Cervical Spine Surgery Revision Outcomes Using Standard Laboratory and Operative Variables
    Schonfeld, Ethan
    Shah, Aaryan
    Johnstone, Thomas Michael
    Rodrigues, Adrian
    Morris, Garret K.
    Stienen, Martin N.
    Veeravagu, Anand
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 185 : e691 - e699
  • [47] Revision Extension of Fusion Surgery in Thoracolumbar Spine Using a Newly Designed Revision Rod - Comparative Matched Cohort Study Versus Implant-Replacement Surgery
    Youn, Yung-Hun
    Cho, Kyu-Jung
    Kim, Jeong-Seok
    Baek, Hyeon
    Hong, Jin-Hyun
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (01) : 94 - 102
  • [48] THE VALUE OF MYELOGRAPHY AND COMPUTER-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE PRIMARY DIAGNOSIS OF THE PROLAPSE OF THE LUMBAR SPINE
    WALDECKER, B
    PROMPER, KH
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 1983, 121 (04): : 374 - 374
  • [49] Predictive value of Medicare claims data for identifying revision of index hip replacement was modest
    Katz, Jeffrey N.
    Wright, Elizabeth A.
    Baron, John A.
    Corbett, Kelly L.
    Nti, Akosua A.
    Malchau, Henrik
    Wright, John
    Losina, Elena
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (05) : 543 - 546
  • [50] Analysis of intraoperative difficulties and management of operative complications in revision anterior exposure of the lumbar spine: a report of 25 consecutive cases
    Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette
    William Delblond
    Alexandre Poignard
    Jérôme Allain
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 766 - 774