There is no "Value Penalty" for revision spine surgery: an application of the operative value index for primary versus revision lumbar fusions

被引:0
|
作者
Sarikonda, Advith [1 ]
Glener, Steven [1 ]
Self, D. Mitchell [1 ]
Quraishi, Danyal [2 ]
Sami, Ashmal [1 ]
Keppetipola, Kavantissa M. [1 ]
Amaravadi, Cheritesh R. [1 ]
Isch, Emily L. [3 ]
Heller, Joshua [1 ]
Prasad, Srinivas K. [1 ]
Sharan, Ashwini [1 ]
Jallo, Jack [1 ]
Vaccaro, Alexander R. [4 ]
Harrop, James [1 ]
Clark, Nicholas [5 ]
Sivaganesan, Ahilan [5 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Hosp Neurosci, Dept Neurosurg, 909 Walnut St,2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] NCH, Hosp Special Surg, Naples, FL, Italy
关键词
Revision; Lumbar fusion; TDABC; Operative value index; OVI; COST; COMPLICATIONS; LAMINECTOMY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10143-025-03480-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing prevalence of elective lumbar fusions has been accompanied by a steady rise in revision procedures. Few studies have identified the relative cost-effectiveness of revision lumbar fusion using detailed costing methodology. Here, we aim to compare the "value" (outcomes achieved per dollar spent) of primary versus revision lumbar fusion by integrating time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) with patient-reported outcomes (PROs). 292 patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo elective lumbar fusion. Revision surgery was defined as any case of lumbar fusion after a previous lumbar spine surgery. TDABC was employed to identify intraoperative costs for all cases. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected both preoperatively and at 6-months postoperatively. "Value" was measured through the Operative Value Index (OVI), defined as the percent improvement in ODI per $1,000 spent intraoperatively. Multivariable linear regression, accounting for confounders, was performed to assess whether revision surgery was significantly associated with total cost and OVI. Secondary analyses were performed to compare costs and OVI between primary fusions, revisions for prior decompression and fusion, and revisions for prior decompression alone. The average total cost of a revision fusion was $18,252 +/- $8,496, compared to $18,073 +/- $8,894 for a primary fusion. The average OVI for these groups were 1.79 and 1.65, respectively. On multivariable regression analysis, there were no significant differences in OVI (p = 0.423) or total cost (p = 0.841) between primary and revision cohorts.In the era of value-based care, it is increasingly important for hospitals to identify drivers of variation in the cost-effectiveness of neurosurgical care. By integrating PROs with detailed cost data, we demonstrate that revision lumbar fusions may not significantly differ in cost or value compared to primary fusions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Primary versus revision total shoulder arthroplasty: comparing relative value and reimbursement trends
    Carney, John Joseph
    Gerlach, Erik
    Plantz, Mark
    Swiatek, Peter Raymond
    Marx, Jeremy
    Saltzman, Matthew
    Marra, Guido
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2022, 25 (01): : 42 - 48
  • [22] Minimally invasive double approach (anterior and posterior) to the lumbar spine in revision surgery
    Bassani, Roberto
    Sinigaglia, Aldo
    Lamartina, Claudio
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (09) : 1900 - 1902
  • [23] Revision surgery for tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine: causes, prevention, and treatment strategy
    Berjano, Pedro
    Cecchinato, Riccardo
    Pun, Alvin
    Boriani, Stefano
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 66 - 77
  • [24] Revision surgery for tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine: causes, prevention, and treatment strategy
    Pedro Berjano
    Riccardo Cecchinato
    Alvin Pun
    Stefano Boriani
    European Spine Journal, 2020, 29 : 66 - 77
  • [25] Perioperative Complications in Revision Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery Incidence and Risk Factors
    Schwender, James D.
    Casnellie, Michael T.
    Perra, Joseph H.
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    Pinto, Manuel R.
    Denis, Francis
    Garvey, Timothy A.
    Polly, David W.
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Dykes, Daryll C.
    Winter, Robert B.
    Wroblewski, Jill M.
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (01) : 87 - 90
  • [26] Minimally invasive double approach (anterior and posterior) to the lumbar spine in revision surgery
    Roberto Bassani
    Aldo Sinigaglia
    Claudio Lamartina
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 1900 - 1902
  • [27] Usefulness of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion as Revision Surgery: Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Surgery
    Jung, JinWoo
    Lee, Subum
    Cho, Dae-Chul
    Han, In-Bo
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Lee, Young-Seok
    Kim, Kyoung-Tae
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 149 : E1067 - E1076
  • [28] Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery
    B. Hentenaar
    A. B. Spoor
    J. de Waal Malefijt
    C. H. Diekerhof
    B. L. den Oudsten
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 11
  • [29] Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery
    Hentenaar, B.
    Spoor, A. B.
    Malefijt, J. de Waal
    Diekerhof, C. H.
    den Oudsten, B. L.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2016, 11
  • [30] Revision surgery of the lumbar spine: anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Kang, Byung-Uk
    Jeon, Sang Hyeop
    Park, Jong Dae
    Maeng, Dae Hyeon
    Choi, Young-Geun
    Choi, Won-Chul
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 5 (03) : 228 - 233