Assessment of radar freeboard, radar penetration rate, and snow depth for potential improvements in Arctic sea ice thickness retrieved from CryoSat-2

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Yi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ,4 ]
Chen, Changsheng [5 ]
Li, Lele [6 ]
Xu, Danya [4 ]
Beardsley, Robert C. [7 ]
Shao, Weizeng [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
[2] School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
[3] Key Laboratory of Polar Ecosystem and Climate Change (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
[4] Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
[5] School for Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, New Bedford, United States
[6] Department of Marine Technology, College of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
[7] Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, United States
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Glaciers - Sea ice - Tropics;
D O I
10.1016/j.coldregions.2024.104408
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The accuracy of Arctic sea ice thickness retrieved from the CryoSat-2 satellite is significantly influenced by the sea ice surface roughness, snow backscatter, and snow depth. In this study, four updated cases incorporating physical model-based radar freeboard, newly estimated radar penetration rate, and well-validated satellite snow depth were constructed to evaluate their potential improvements to the Alfred Wegener Institute's CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness (AWI CS2). The updated cases were then compared with airborne remotely sensed observations from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Operation IceBridge (OIB) and CryoSat Validation Experiment (CryoVEx) in 2013 and 2014, as well as with ground-based observations during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition from October 2019 to April 2020. The results showed that all updated cases had the potential to improve the accuracy of sea ice thickness, maintaining comparable correlation coefficients and significantly reducing statistical errors compared to the AWI CS2. In the evaluation with OIB, CryoVEx, and MOSAiC, the four updated cases reduced the root mean square error of AWI CS2 by up to 0.68 m (55 %) against OIB, 0.76 m (53 %) against CryoVEx, and 0.47 m (76 %) against MOSAiC. The updated sea ice thicknesses retained the main distribution patterns generated by AWI CS2, but generally showed thinner sea ice thicknesses. From 2013 to 2018, the interannual variation trends between the updated cases and AWI CS2 varied regionally, but both show significant decreasing trends along the northern coasts of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and Greenland. The updated schemes provided new insights into the retrieval of sea ice thickness using CryoSat-2, thereby further contributing to the quantification of the sea ice volume in the context of a warming climate. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the Impact of Lead and Floe Sampling on Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Estimates from Envisat and CryoSat-2
    Tilling, R.
    Ridout, A.
    Shepherd, A.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2019, 124 (11) : 7473 - 7485
  • [42] Arctic sea ice thickness retrievals from CryoSat-2: seasonal and interannual comparisons of three different products
    Li, Mengmeng
    Ke, Chang-Qing
    Xie, Hongjie
    Miao, Xin
    Shen, Xiaoyi
    Xia, Wentao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 41 (01) : 152 - 170
  • [43] Kara and Barents sea ice thickness estimation based on CryoSat-2 radar altimeter and Sentinel-1 dual-polarized synthetic aperture radar
    Karvonen, Juha
    Rinne, Eero
    Sallila, Heidi
    Uotila, Petteri
    Makynen, Marko
    CRYOSPHERE, 2022, 16 (05): : 1821 - 1844
  • [44] Improving Met Office seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice using assimilation of CryoSat-2 thickness
    Blockley, Edward W.
    Peterson, K. Andrew
    CRYOSPHERE, 2018, 12 (11): : 3419 - 3438
  • [45] Snow depth on Arctic sea ice derived from radar: In situ comparisons and time series analysis
    Holt, Benjamin
    Johnson, Michael P.
    Perkovic-Martin, Dragana
    Panzer, Ben
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2015, 120 (06) : 4260 - 4287
  • [46] A weekly Arctic sea-ice thickness data record from merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS satellite data
    Ricker, Robert
    Hendricks, Stefan
    Kaleschke, Lars
    Tian-Kunze, Xiangshan
    King, Jennifer
    Haas, Christian
    CRYOSPHERE, 2017, 11 (04): : 1607 - 1623
  • [47] Sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products from Operation IceBridge airborne data
    Kurtz, N. T.
    Farrell, S. L.
    Studinger, M.
    Galin, N.
    Harbeck, J. P.
    Lindsay, R.
    Onana, V. D.
    Panzer, B.
    Sonntag, J. G.
    CRYOSPHERE, 2013, 7 (04): : 1035 - 1056
  • [48] Empirical parametrization of Envisat freeboard retrieval of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice based on CryoSat-2: progress in the ESA Climate Change Initiative
    Paul, Stephan
    Hendricks, Stefan
    Ricker, Robert
    Kern, Stefan
    Rinne, Eero
    CRYOSPHERE, 2018, 12 (07): : 2437 - 2460
  • [49] PRELIMINARY HY-2B RADAR FREEBOARD RETRIEVAL OVER ARCTIC SEA ICE
    Jiang, Maofei
    Xu, Ke
    Zhong, Wenqing
    Jia, Yongjun
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2022), 2022, : 3904 - 3907
  • [50] Impact of snow accumulation on CryoSat-2 range retrievals over Arctic sea ice: An observational approach with buoy data
    Ricker, Robert
    Hendricks, Stefan
    Perovich, Donald K.
    Helm, Veit
    Gerdes, Ruediger
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 42 (11) : 4447 - 4455