Assessment of radar freeboard, radar penetration rate, and snow depth for potential improvements in Arctic sea ice thickness retrieved from CryoSat-2

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Yi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ,4 ]
Chen, Changsheng [5 ]
Li, Lele [6 ]
Xu, Danya [4 ]
Beardsley, Robert C. [7 ]
Shao, Weizeng [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
[2] School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
[3] Key Laboratory of Polar Ecosystem and Climate Change (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
[4] Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
[5] School for Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, New Bedford, United States
[6] Department of Marine Technology, College of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
[7] Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, United States
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Glaciers - Sea ice - Tropics;
D O I
10.1016/j.coldregions.2024.104408
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The accuracy of Arctic sea ice thickness retrieved from the CryoSat-2 satellite is significantly influenced by the sea ice surface roughness, snow backscatter, and snow depth. In this study, four updated cases incorporating physical model-based radar freeboard, newly estimated radar penetration rate, and well-validated satellite snow depth were constructed to evaluate their potential improvements to the Alfred Wegener Institute's CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness (AWI CS2). The updated cases were then compared with airborne remotely sensed observations from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Operation IceBridge (OIB) and CryoSat Validation Experiment (CryoVEx) in 2013 and 2014, as well as with ground-based observations during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition from October 2019 to April 2020. The results showed that all updated cases had the potential to improve the accuracy of sea ice thickness, maintaining comparable correlation coefficients and significantly reducing statistical errors compared to the AWI CS2. In the evaluation with OIB, CryoVEx, and MOSAiC, the four updated cases reduced the root mean square error of AWI CS2 by up to 0.68 m (55 %) against OIB, 0.76 m (53 %) against CryoVEx, and 0.47 m (76 %) against MOSAiC. The updated sea ice thicknesses retained the main distribution patterns generated by AWI CS2, but generally showed thinner sea ice thicknesses. From 2013 to 2018, the interannual variation trends between the updated cases and AWI CS2 varied regionally, but both show significant decreasing trends along the northern coasts of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and Greenland. The updated schemes provided new insights into the retrieval of sea ice thickness using CryoSat-2, thereby further contributing to the quantification of the sea ice volume in the context of a warming climate. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Potential basin-scale estimates of Arctic snow depth with sea ice freeboards from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2: An exploratory analysis
    Kwok, R.
    Markus, T.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (06) : 1243 - 1250
  • [32] A New Retracking Algorithm for Retrieving Sea Ice Freeboard from CryoSat-2 Radar Altimeter Data during Winter-Spring Transition
    Shen, Xiaoyi
    Simila, Markku
    Dierking, Wolfgang
    Zhang, Xi
    Ke, Changqing
    Liu, Meijie
    Wang, Manman
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (10)
  • [33] Preliminary results of sea ice freeboard measurements of beaufort sea from cryosat-2 altimetry
    Zhang, S.
    Zuo, Y.
    Xiao, F.
    Yuan, L.
    Geng, T.
    Xuan, Y.
    International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 2019, 42 (2/W13): : 1811 - 1815
  • [34] Near-real-time Arctic sea ice thickness and volume from CryoSat-2
    Tilling, Rachel L.
    Ridout, Andy
    Shepherd, Andrew
    CRYOSPHERE, 2016, 10 (05): : 2003 - 2012
  • [35] New insight from CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness for sea ice modelling
    Schroeder, David
    Feltham, Danny L.
    Tsamados, Michel
    Ridout, Andy
    Tilling, Rachel
    CRYOSPHERE, 2019, 13 (01): : 125 - 139
  • [36] Analyzing the impact of CryoSat-2 ice thickness initialization on seasonal Arctic Sea Ice prediction
    Allard, Richard
    Metzger, E. Joseph
    Barton, Neil
    Li, Li
    Kurtz, Nathan
    Phelps, Michael
    Franklin, Deborah
    Smedstad, Ole Martin
    Crout, Julia
    Posey, Pamela
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, 2020, 61 (82) : 78 - 85
  • [37] IMPROVED RETRIEVAL OF SEA ICE THICKNESS FROM SMOS AND CRYOSAT-2
    Kaleschke, Lars
    Tian-Kunze, Xiangshan
    Maass, Nina
    Ricker, Robert
    Hendricks, Stefan
    Drusch, Matthias
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2015, : 5232 - 5235
  • [38] Arctic Freeboard and Snow Depth From Near-Coincident CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 (CRYO2ICE) Observations: A First Examination of Winter Sea Ice During 2020-2022
    Hansen, Renee M. Fredensborg
    Skourup, Henriette
    Rinne, Eero
    Hoyland, Knut V.
    Landy, Jack C.
    Merkouriadi, Ioanna
    Forsberg, Rene
    EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2024, 11 (04)
  • [39] Impact of assimilating a merged sea-ice thickness from CryoSat-2 and SMOS in the Arctic reanalysis
    Xie, Jiping
    Counillon, Francois
    Bertino, Laurent
    CRYOSPHERE, 2018, 12 (11): : 3671 - 3691
  • [40] Arctic Mission Benefit Analysis: impact of sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products on sea ice forecast performance
    Kaminski, Thomas
    Kauker, Frank
    Pedersen, Leif Toudal
    Vossbeck, Michael
    Haak, Helmuth
    Niederdrenk, Laura
    Hendricks, Stefan
    Ricker, Robert
    Karcher, Michael
    Eicken, Hajo
    Grabak, Ola
    CRYOSPHERE, 2018, 12 (08): : 2569 - 2594