Patients’ acceptability of a patient-reported outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation (the PRO-Heart-DK)—a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability

被引:0
|
作者
Emma Dedic [1 ]
Heidi Sønderby Vistisen [2 ]
Ann-Dorthe Zwisler [3 ]
Bente Faurby Pedersen [4 ]
Karin Lundsby Kappel [5 ]
Helle Kanstrup [6 ]
Rikke Elmose Mols [4 ]
Cecilie Lindström Egholm [7 ]
机构
[1] Odense University Hospital,REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care
[2] University of Southern Denmark,Department of Clinical Research
[3] Aarhus University Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[4] Odense University Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[5] Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital,Rehabilitation and Palliative Care Research Group, Department of Oncology
[6] University of Copenhagen,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
[7] Nordfyn Municipality,undefined
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measure; Cardiac rehabilitation; Ischemic heart disease; Acceptability; Theoretical Framework of Acceptability; Patient engagement; Patient management;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-024-00831-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are increasingly applied in clinical settings in order to enhance patient involvement and patient management. The use of PROM in practice is, like any other healthcare intervention, depending on the patients’ accept. Applying survey and interview as methods, this study explored patients’ acceptability of a PROM in cardiac rehabilitation clinical practice using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Overall, the findings indicate that many patients with ischemic heart disease consider PROM to be relevant and useful as part of the cardiac rehabilitation process which suggest high level of acceptability. However, some aspects of the PROM, specifically the perceived questionnaire relevance, comprehensiveness and structure (e.g. lack of suitable response-options) need further improvement to enhance patients’ acceptability and ensure their future engagement.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Patients With Severe Lower Extremity Trauma (LIMB-Q): Protocol for a Multiphase Mixed Methods Study
    Mundy, Lily R.
    Klassen, Anne
    Grier, Jordan
    Carty, Matthew J.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Hollenbeck, Scott T.
    Gage, Mark J.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (10):
  • [22] eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability
    Girgis, Afaf
    Durcinoska, Ivana
    Levesque, Janelle V.
    Gerges, Martha
    Sandell, Tiffany
    Arnold, Anthony
    Delaney, Geoff P.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (10)
  • [23] Bridging troubled water - exploring improvement and patients' experiences using patient-reported outcome measures in physiotherapy: A mixed-method study
    Bjorbaekmo, Wenche Schroder
    Mengshoel, Anne Marit
    Robinson, Hilde Stendal
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2022, 5 (02)
  • [24] Development of a comprehensive patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment model for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) research and clinical care: A mixed methods study
    Rutherford, Claudia
    King, Madeleine T.
    Costa, Daniel S. J.
    Smith, David P.
    Patel, Manish I.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 200 - 200
  • [25] Feasibility and acceptability of electronic symptom surveillance with clinician feedback using the patient-reported outcomes version of common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) in Danish prostate cancer patients
    Baeksted C.
    Pappot H.
    Nissen A.
    Hjollund N.H.
    Mitchell S.A.
    Basch E.
    Bidstrup P.E.
    Dalton S.O.
    Johansen C.
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 1 (1)
  • [26] Evaluation of the usefulness of EQ-5D as a patient-reported outcome measure using the Paretian classification of health change among patients with chronic heart failure
    Åsa Jonsson
    Lotti Orwelius
    Ulf Dahlstrom
    Margareta Kristenson
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4
  • [27] Evaluation of the usefulness of EQ-5D as a patient-reported outcome measure using the Paretian classification of health change among patients with chronic heart failure
    Jonsson, Asa
    Orwelius, Lotti
    Dahlstrom, Ulf
    Kristenson, Margareta
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [28] Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care and safety in the management of patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney disease (PRO-trACK project): a mixed-methods project protocol
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Dutton, Mary
    Slade, Anita
    Marklew, Neil
    Price, Gary
    Verdi, Rav
    Waters, Judi
    Sharpe, Keeley
    Calvert, Melanie
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (06):
  • [29] PRO-ONKO—selection of patient-reported outcome assessments for the clinical use in cancer patients—a mixed-method multicenter cross-sectional exploratory study
    Heike Schmidt
    Daniela Merkel
    Michael Koehler
    Hans-Henning Flechtner
    Jörg Sigle
    Bernd Klinge
    Karin Jordan
    Dirk Vordermark
    Margarete Landenberger
    Patrick Jahn
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 2503 - 2512
  • [30] Do patient-reported outcome measures measure up? A qualitative study to examine perceptions and experiences with heart failure proms among diverse, low-income patients
    Davis, Jonathan
    Olazo, Kristan
    Sierra, Maribel
    Tarver, Michelle E.
    Caldwell, Brittany
    Saha, Anindita
    Lisker, Sarah
    Lyles, Courtney
    Sarkar, Urmimala
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)