Patients’ acceptability of a patient-reported outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation (the PRO-Heart-DK)—a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability

被引:0
|
作者
Emma Dedic [1 ]
Heidi Sønderby Vistisen [2 ]
Ann-Dorthe Zwisler [3 ]
Bente Faurby Pedersen [4 ]
Karin Lundsby Kappel [5 ]
Helle Kanstrup [6 ]
Rikke Elmose Mols [4 ]
Cecilie Lindström Egholm [7 ]
机构
[1] Odense University Hospital,REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care
[2] University of Southern Denmark,Department of Clinical Research
[3] Aarhus University Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[4] Odense University Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[5] Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital,Rehabilitation and Palliative Care Research Group, Department of Oncology
[6] University of Copenhagen,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
[7] Nordfyn Municipality,undefined
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measure; Cardiac rehabilitation; Ischemic heart disease; Acceptability; Theoretical Framework of Acceptability; Patient engagement; Patient management;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-024-00831-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are increasingly applied in clinical settings in order to enhance patient involvement and patient management. The use of PROM in practice is, like any other healthcare intervention, depending on the patients’ accept. Applying survey and interview as methods, this study explored patients’ acceptability of a PROM in cardiac rehabilitation clinical practice using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Overall, the findings indicate that many patients with ischemic heart disease consider PROM to be relevant and useful as part of the cardiac rehabilitation process which suggest high level of acceptability. However, some aspects of the PROM, specifically the perceived questionnaire relevance, comprehensiveness and structure (e.g. lack of suitable response-options) need further improvement to enhance patients’ acceptability and ensure their future engagement.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Do patient-reported outcome measures measure up? A qualitative study to examine perceptions and experiences with heart failure proms among diverse, low-income patients
    Jonathan Davis
    Kristan Olazo
    Maribel Sierra
    Michelle E. Tarver
    Brittany Caldwell
    Anindita Saha
    Sarah Lisker
    Courtney Lyles
    Urmimala Sarkar
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6
  • [32] PRO-ONKO-selection of patient-reported outcome assessments for the clinical use in cancer patients-a mixed-method multicenter cross-sectional exploratory study
    Schmidt, Heike
    Merkel, Daniela
    Koehler, Michael
    Flechtner, Hans-Henning
    Sigle, Joerg
    Klinge, Bernd
    Jordan, Karin
    Vordermark, Dirk
    Landenberger, Margarete
    Jahn, Patrick
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (06) : 2503 - 2512
  • [33] EXPLORING TIME-DEPENDENT VARIATION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME SCORES ACROSS DIFFERENT TIME-POINTS FOR PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE CONDITIONS: A MIXED METHODS LONGITUDINAL STUDY
    Davey, A.
    Porter, I
    Green, C.
    Valderas, J. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S14 - S14
  • [34] Patient-reported outcome measures: selection of a valid questionnaire for routine symptom assessment in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease - a four-phase mixed methods study
    van der Willik, Esmee M.
    Meuleman, Yvette
    Prantl, Karen
    van Rijn, Giel
    Bos, Willem Jan W.
    van Ittersum, Frans J.
    Bart, Hans A. J.
    Hemmelder, Marc H.
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [35] Patient-reported outcome measures: selection of a valid questionnaire for routine symptom assessment in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease – a four-phase mixed methods study
    Esmee M. van der Willik
    Yvette Meuleman
    Karen Prantl
    Giel van Rijn
    Willem Jan W. Bos
    Frans J. van Ittersum
    Hans A. J. Bart
    Marc H. Hemmelder
    Friedo W. Dekker
    BMC Nephrology, 20
  • [36] CLINICAL RESEARCH PROFESSIONALS' (CRPS) PERCEPTIONS OF USING ELECTRONIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME ( EPRO) DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS IN ONCOLOGY CLINICAL TRIALS: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Cho, Youmin
    Jiang, Yun
    Saint Arnault, Denise
    Williams, David A.
    Zahrieh, David
    Zahrieh, David
    Smith, Ellen Lavoie
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2023, 50 (02)
  • [37] Creating and validating a patient-reported outcome instrument to assess symptom experience related to surgical wounds in women with vulvar neoplasms - a mixed methods study (WOMAN-PRO, 2009-2011)
    Senn, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2010, 14 : S12 - S12
  • [38] Investigating primary healthcare practitioners' barriers and enablers to referral of patients with COPD to pulmonary rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study using the Theoretical Domains Framework
    Watson, Jane Suzanne
    Jordan, Rachel Elizabeth
    Adab, Peymane
    Vlaev, Ivo
    Enocson, Alexandra
    Greenfield, Sheila
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [39] Acceptability of a high-protein Mediterranean-style diet and resistance exercise protocol for cardiac rehabilitation patients: Involving service users in intervention design using a mixed-methods participatory approach
    Kirwan, Richard
    Newson, Lisa
    McCullough, Deaglan
    Butler, Tom
    Davies, Ian G.
    Perez de Heredia, Fatima
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
  • [40] Using a timeline activity in concept elicitation interviews with youth: Methods and lessons learned from an interpretive descriptive study to develop a patient-reported outcome measure (GENDER-Q Youth)
    Kennedy, Shelby
    Jack, Susan
    Johnson, Natasha
    Couturier, Jennifer
    Rae, Charlene
    Klassen, Anne
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 : S147 - S148