Patients’ acceptability of a patient-reported outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation (the PRO-Heart-DK)—a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability

被引:0
|
作者
Emma Dedic [1 ]
Heidi Sønderby Vistisen [2 ]
Ann-Dorthe Zwisler [3 ]
Bente Faurby Pedersen [4 ]
Karin Lundsby Kappel [5 ]
Helle Kanstrup [6 ]
Rikke Elmose Mols [4 ]
Cecilie Lindström Egholm [7 ]
机构
[1] Odense University Hospital,REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care
[2] University of Southern Denmark,Department of Clinical Research
[3] Aarhus University Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[4] Odense University Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[5] Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital,Rehabilitation and Palliative Care Research Group, Department of Oncology
[6] University of Copenhagen,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
[7] Nordfyn Municipality,undefined
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measure; Cardiac rehabilitation; Ischemic heart disease; Acceptability; Theoretical Framework of Acceptability; Patient engagement; Patient management;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-024-00831-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are increasingly applied in clinical settings in order to enhance patient involvement and patient management. The use of PROM in practice is, like any other healthcare intervention, depending on the patients’ accept. Applying survey and interview as methods, this study explored patients’ acceptability of a PROM in cardiac rehabilitation clinical practice using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Overall, the findings indicate that many patients with ischemic heart disease consider PROM to be relevant and useful as part of the cardiac rehabilitation process which suggest high level of acceptability. However, some aspects of the PROM, specifically the perceived questionnaire relevance, comprehensiveness and structure (e.g. lack of suitable response-options) need further improvement to enhance patients’ acceptability and ensure their future engagement.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Patients' acceptability of a patient-reported outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation (The PRO-Heart-DK) - a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability
    Dedic, Emma
    Egholm, Cecilie Lindstrom
    Vistisen, Heidi Sonderby
    Zwisler, Ann-Dorthe
    Pedersen, Bente Faurby
    Kappel, Karin Lundsby
    Kanstrup, Helle
    Mols, Elmose
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 : S155 - S156
  • [2] Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool in Routine Outpatient Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Formative Pilot Study
    Skovlund, Soren E.
    Troelsen, Lise Havbaek
    Noergaard, Lise Mellergaard
    Pietraszek, Anna
    Jakobsen, Poul Erik
    Ejskjaer, Niels
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (11)
  • [3] Mixed methods study to develop the content validity and the conceptual framework of the electronic patient-reported outcome measure for vascular conditions
    Aber, Ahmed
    Phillips, Patrick
    Lumley, Elizabeth
    Radley, Stephen
    Thomas, Steven M.
    Nawaz, Shah
    Jones, Georgina
    Michaels, Jonathan
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (08):
  • [4] Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for psychotherapeutic interventions in people with seizures: A mixed methods study
    Michaelis, Rosa
    Meyer, Stephanie
    Reuber, Markus
    Schone, Catrin
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 99
  • [5] Feasibility and acceptability of using a patient reported outcome measure (OxFAB) to help patients with heart failure to recognise and communicate worsening symptoms to specialist nurses
    Walthall, Doctor H.
    Diaz, L.
    Harris, E.
    Astin, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2023, 22 : I33 - I33
  • [6] Employing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to support newly diagnosed patients with melanoma: Feasibility and acceptability of a holistic needs assessment intervention
    Kotronoulas, Grigorios
    Connaghan, John
    Grenfell, Jean
    Gupta, Girish
    Smith, Leigh
    Simpson, Mhairi
    Maguire, Roma
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2017, 31 : 59 - 68
  • [7] Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing Site-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Head and Neck Cancer Clinics: A Prospective Institutional Study
    Al-Rashdan, Abdulla
    Grendarova, Petra
    Yannitsos, Demetra
    Quon, Harvey
    Banerjee, Robyn
    Barbera, Lisa
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 7 (06)
  • [8] Acceptability and accuracy of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for surveillance of breathlessness in routine lung cancer care: A mixed-method study
    Sung, Ji Hyun
    Brown, M. Catherine
    Perez-Cosio, Andrea
    Pratt, Laura
    Houad, Jacy
    Liang, Mindy
    Gill, Gursharan
    Moradian, Saeed
    Liu, Geoffrey
    Howell, Doris
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 147 : 1 - 11
  • [9] Development of a comprehensive patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment model for patient-centered care in colorectal cancer (CRC): a mixed methods study
    Rutherford, Claudia
    King, Madeleine
    Mueller, Fabiola
    Campbell, Rachel
    Faiz, Nasiba
    White, Kate
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 : S102 - S103
  • [10] Creation of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure platform Voxe: a mixed methods study protocol in paediatric solid organ transplantation
    Anthony, Samantha J.
    Pol, Sarah J.
    Lin, Jia
    Barwick, Melanie
    Brudno, Michael
    Manase, Dorin
    Parekh, Rulan Savita
    Silva, Amanda
    Stinson, Jennifer
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10):