Postoperative urinary retention after oblique lumbar interbody fusion under the systematic management protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Lim, Joonsoo [1 ]
Lim, Jangyeob [1 ]
Khan, Asfandyar [2 ]
Lee, Chang-Hyun [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Jun-Hoe [3 ,4 ]
Choi, Sejin [3 ]
Kim, Tae-Shin [10 ]
Choi, Yunhee [6 ]
Chung, Chun Kee [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Yoon, Sangwook T. [7 ]
Kim, Kyoung-Tae [8 ]
Kim, Chi Heon [3 ,4 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Sch Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, England
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Neurosci Res Inst, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Div Med Stat, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[7] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[8] Bokwang Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 128 Guma Ro, Daegu 24853, South Korea
[9] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Device Dev, 103 Daehak ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[10] Sinchon Yonsei Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 110 Seogang ro, Seoul, South Korea
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Algorithm; Arthrodesis; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Lumbar vertebra; Protocol; Spine; Surgery; Urinary retention; SPINAL-FUSION; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; LIDOCAINE; BLADDER; RISK;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-81697-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive lateral lumbar fusion technique and patients are discharged 1-2 days after surgery. Because OLIF utilizes a retroperitoneal approach close to the superior hypogastric plexus, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) may not be an uncommon problem. The purpose of this study was to present the incidence and outcomes of POUR with a systematic care protocol. The records of 102 consecutive patients (M:F = 34:68; mean age, 68.0 +/- 8.4 years) were retrospectively reviewed. After OLIF, the indwelling urinary catheter was immediately removed, and every patient was encouraged to void within 6 h. The POUR care protocol, following a clinical pathway, was based on residual urine (RU), which was monitored with an ultrasound bladder scan after each voiding or every 6 h for 48 h. The incidence rate of POUR was 44% (45/102) at 24 h, 17% (17/102) at 48 h, and 2% (2/102) at 1 month. Preoperative urological symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 3.2) and violation of the protocol (OR 28.3) were risk factors at 24 h. At 48 h, violation of the protocol was the only risk factor (OR 9.6). Identifying risk factors and a preemptive care protocol may reduce permanent POUR.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ureter Injury as a Complication of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Hyeong-Jin
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Park, Choon Keun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 102 : 693.e7
  • [32] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yun-lu Wang
    Xi-yong Li
    Lun Liu
    Song-feng Li
    Peng-fei Han
    Xiao-dong Li
    Neurosurgical Review, 46
  • [33] Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Xiao, Yang
    Zhu, Ce
    Xiu, Peng
    Wang, Liang
    Zhang, Zhuang
    Deng, Zhipeng
    Song, Yueming
    Yang, Xi
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (10) : E135 - E141
  • [34] Postoperative spondylitis after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using cages
    Kee-Yong Ha
    Young-Hoon Kim
    European Spine Journal, 2004, 13 : 419 - 424
  • [35] Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Anesthetics and Surgical Approach
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Ezeonu, Teeto
    Dees, Azra N.
    Wiafe, Bright M.
    Wright, Justin
    Toci, Gregory R.
    Schwenk, Eric S.
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, Ian D.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (23) : 1189 - 1196
  • [36] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Li, Xi-yong
    Liu, Lun
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-fei
    Li, Xiao-dong
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [37] Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Jiang, Zhi-Kai
    Ge, Hong-Ping
    Jiang, Ting-Fei
    Ma, Huan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (10) : 1876 - 1876
  • [38] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [39] Fusion rate and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
    Xiao, Xun
    Duan, Heng
    Pan, Xin
    Zhao, Hua
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [40] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar fusion: a case-controlled study
    Cong Jin
    Minghua Xie
    Lei He
    Wenbin Xu
    Weiqi Han
    Wengqing Liang
    Yu Qian
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14