Postoperative urinary retention after oblique lumbar interbody fusion under the systematic management protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Lim, Joonsoo [1 ]
Lim, Jangyeob [1 ]
Khan, Asfandyar [2 ]
Lee, Chang-Hyun [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Jun-Hoe [3 ,4 ]
Choi, Sejin [3 ]
Kim, Tae-Shin [10 ]
Choi, Yunhee [6 ]
Chung, Chun Kee [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Yoon, Sangwook T. [7 ]
Kim, Kyoung-Tae [8 ]
Kim, Chi Heon [3 ,4 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Sch Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, England
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Neurosci Res Inst, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Div Med Stat, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[7] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[8] Bokwang Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 128 Guma Ro, Daegu 24853, South Korea
[9] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Device Dev, 103 Daehak ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[10] Sinchon Yonsei Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 110 Seogang ro, Seoul, South Korea
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Algorithm; Arthrodesis; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Lumbar vertebra; Protocol; Spine; Surgery; Urinary retention; SPINAL-FUSION; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; LIDOCAINE; BLADDER; RISK;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-81697-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive lateral lumbar fusion technique and patients are discharged 1-2 days after surgery. Because OLIF utilizes a retroperitoneal approach close to the superior hypogastric plexus, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) may not be an uncommon problem. The purpose of this study was to present the incidence and outcomes of POUR with a systematic care protocol. The records of 102 consecutive patients (M:F = 34:68; mean age, 68.0 +/- 8.4 years) were retrospectively reviewed. After OLIF, the indwelling urinary catheter was immediately removed, and every patient was encouraged to void within 6 h. The POUR care protocol, following a clinical pathway, was based on residual urine (RU), which was monitored with an ultrasound bladder scan after each voiding or every 6 h for 48 h. The incidence rate of POUR was 44% (45/102) at 24 h, 17% (17/102) at 48 h, and 2% (2/102) at 1 month. Preoperative urological symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 3.2) and violation of the protocol (OR 28.3) were risk factors at 24 h. At 48 h, violation of the protocol was the only risk factor (OR 9.6). Identifying risk factors and a preemptive care protocol may reduce permanent POUR.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar tuberculosis
    Zhang, Wenhui
    Liu, Jie
    Tai, Huiping
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (08) : 3710 - 3711
  • [12] Development and Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Li, Renjie
    Li, Xuefeng
    Zhou, Hong
    Jiang, Weimin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) : 355 - 365
  • [13] Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bochen An
    Bowen Ren
    Zhenchuan Han
    Keya Mao
    Jianheng Liu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [14] Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    An, Bochen
    Ren, Bowen
    Han, Zhenchuan
    Mao, Keya
    Liu, Jianheng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [15] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xi-yong Li
    Yun-lu Wang
    Su Yang
    Chang-sheng Liao
    Song-feng Li
    Peng-yong Han
    Peng-fei Han
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 5657 - 5670
  • [16] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Which One in Which Patient?
    Dada, Abraham
    Liles, Campbell
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Alan, Nima
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [17] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xi-yong
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Yang, Su
    Liao, Chang-sheng
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-yong
    Han, Peng-fei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (09) : 5657 - 5670
  • [18] Efficacy and Safety of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Ai-Feng
    Guo, Tian-Ci
    Chen, Ji-Xin
    Yu, Wei-Jie
    Feng, Hui-Chuan
    Niu, Pu-Yu
    Zhai, Jing-Bo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E964 - E974
  • [19] Salvage Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Pseudarthrosis after Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note
    Masuda, Soichiro
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Kimura, Hiroaki
    Tanida, Shimei
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Murata, Koichi
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : 107 - 112
  • [20] Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
    Hiromitsu Takaoka
    Kazuhide Inage
    Yawara Eguchi
    Yasuhiro Shiga
    Takeo Furuya
    Satoshi Maki
    Yasuchika Aoki
    Masahiro Inoue
    Takayuki Fujiyoshi
    Takuya Miyamoto
    Yuji Noguchi
    Shinichiro Nakamura
    Tomoaki Kinoshita
    Takahito Kamada
    Hiroshi Takahashi
    Junya Saito
    Masaki Norimoto
    Toshiaki Kotani
    Tsuyoshi Sakuma
    Yasushi Iijima
    Tetsuhiro Ishikawa
    Tomotaka Umimura
    Mitsutoshi Ohta
    Miyako Suzuki-Narita
    Keigo Enomoto
    Takashi Sato
    Masashi Sato
    Masahiro Suzuki
    Takashi Hozumi
    Geundong Kim
    Norichika Mizuki
    Ryuto Tsuchiya
    Takuma Otagiri
    Tomohito Mukaihata
    Takahisa Hishiya
    Seiji Ohtori
    Sumihisa Orita
    Scientific Reports, 11