Prominence of corporate science in quantum computing research

被引:0
|
作者
Ko, Hyunmin [1 ]
Kwon, Seokbeom [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Grad Sch Management Technol, Suwon, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Grad Sch Ind Engn, Suwon, South Korea
关键词
Corporate research; Complementary asset; Quantum computing; Research impact; Resource-based view; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH; FIRM PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; COLLABORATION; PUBLICATIONS; KNOWLEDGE; BUSINESS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123949
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, we empirically examined the growing prominence of corporate science and its influence on quantum computing research. An analysis of approximately 30,000 research papers on quantum computing revealed that firms are increasingly publishing scientifically impactful research compared to noncorporate entities in this field. Additional analyses of text data from research article abstracts using topic modeling indicated that corporate research is concentrated on prominent topics such as quantum computing for Machine Learning/ Artificial Intelligence and quantum algorithms, attracting increasing scholarly attention. In contrast, noncorporate research has been relatively dispersed across various topics. Drawing on the Resource-Based View and insights from an interview with a field expert, we theorize that with secured access to unique and rare resources for quantum computing research, corporate researchers are better positioned to experiment and iterate on novel ideas than their noncorporate counterparts. The publication of these research outcomes provides strategic advantages without compromising their appropriability. Our findings have implications for science policymakers and corporate innovation strategists, contributing to the literature on the role of corporate research in scientific progress.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can Molecular Quantum Computing Bridge Quantum Biology and Cognitive Science?
    Wu, Wei
    Zhu, Jianhua
    Yao, Yong
    Lan, Yucheng
    Intelligent Computing, 2024, 3
  • [22] General Counsel Prominence and Corporate Tax Policy
    Abernathy, John L.
    Kubick, Thomas R.
    Masli, Adi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN TAXATION ASSOCIATION, 2016, 38 (01): : 39 - 56
  • [23] Computing for Global Development: Is it Computer Science Research?
    Toyama, Kentaro
    Ali, Muneeb
    ACM SIGCOMM COMPUTER COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 2009, 39 (05) : 40 - 43
  • [24] Putting the Computer Science in Computing Education Research
    Franklin, Diana
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2015, 58 (02) : 34 - 36
  • [25] Advances and opportunities in materials science for scalable quantum computing
    Vincenzo Lordi
    John M. Nichol
    MRS Bulletin, 2021, 46 : 589 - 595
  • [26] Advances and opportunities in materials science for scalable quantum computing
    Lordi, Vincenzo
    Nichol, John M.
    MRS BULLETIN, 2021, 46 (07) : 589 - 595
  • [27] Future Potential of Quantum Computing and Simulations in Biological Science
    Pal, Soumen
    Bhattacharya, Manojit
    Dash, Snehasish
    Lee, Sang-Soo
    Chakraborty, Chiranjib
    MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 66 (09) : 2201 - 2218
  • [28] Quantum computing for data-centric engineering and science
    Herbert, Steven
    DATA-CENTRIC ENGINEERING, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [29] RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Basic science finds corporate refuge
    Drake, Nadia
    NATURE, 2014, 509 (7498) : 18 - 19
  • [30] INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, SOCIAL-SCIENCE AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
    VOSS, JR
    RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, 1974, 17 (05): : 13 - 16