Spatial Performance Indicators for Traffic Flow Prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Fathurrahman, Muhammad Farhan [1 ,2 ]
Gautama, Sidharta [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Ghent University, Ghent,9000, Belgium
[2] FlandersMake@UGent—Corelab ISyE, Lommel,3920, Belgium
来源
Applied Sciences (Switzerland) | 2024年 / 14卷 / 24期
关键词
Air traffic control - Highway administration - Information management - Prediction models - Street traffic control;
D O I
10.3390/app142411952
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traffic flow prediction, crucial for traffic management, relies on spatial and temporal data to achieve high accuracy. However, standard performance metrics only measure the average prediction errors and overlook the spatiotemporal aspects. To address this gap, this study introduces three simple spatial key performance indicators (KPIs): Global Moran’s I, Getis-Ord General G, and Adapted PageRank Algorithm Modified (APAM). We evaluated the traffic prediction results for synthetic clustering scenarios and four different prediction methods applied to the PeMSD8 dataset using spatial KPIs. Spatial KPIs are calculated based on traffic prediction errors and the adjacency matrix of the traffic network. Our results demonstrate that spatial KPIs can effectively differentiate between synthetic clustering scenarios. Global Moran’s I measures the spatial autocorrelation, Getis-Ord General G measures the spatial clustering of high/low values, and the univariate analysis of APAM deduces the distribution of node importance by considering node centrality and node values. Getis-Ord General G showed the highest sensitivity, being capable of distinguishing between methods with similar average RMSE, whereas Global Moran’s I and APAM univariate analysis revealed subtle differences between methods. Spatial KPIs serve as important complementary metrics for performance evaluation in the design of robust traffic management systems. © 2024 by the authors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incident indicators for freeway traffic flow models
    Dabiri, Azita
    Kulcsar, Balazs
    COMMUNICATIONS IN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2022, 2
  • [22] Fuzzy Inspired Deep Belief Network for the Traffic Flow Prediction in Intelligent Transportation System Using Flow Strength Indicators
    George, Shiju
    Santra, Ajit Kumar
    BIG DATA, 2020, 8 (04) : 291 - 307
  • [23] A Hybrid Transformer-based Spatial-Temporal Network for Traffic Flow Prediction
    Tian, Guanqun
    Li, Dequan
    2024 IEEE 19TH CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, ICIEA 2024, 2024,
  • [24] Attention-Based Spatial-Temporal Fusion Networks for Traffic Flow Prediction
    Wang, Jiaying
    Yang, Heng
    Shan, Jing
    Jiang, Junyi
    Song, Xiaoxu
    WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, WISA 2024, 2024, 14883 : 500 - 511
  • [25] A multi-feature spatial-temporal fusion network for traffic flow prediction
    Yan, Jiahe
    Li, Honghui
    Zhang, Dalin
    Bai, Yanhui
    Xu, Yi
    Han, Chengshan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [26] Dynamic Spatial-Temporal Self-Attention Network for Traffic Flow Prediction
    Wang, Dong
    Yang, Hongji
    Zhou, Hua
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [27] A Hybrid-Convolution Spatial-Temporal Recurrent Network For Traffic Flow Prediction
    Zhang, Xu
    Wen, Shunjie
    Yan, Liang
    Feng, Jiangfan
    Xia, Ying
    COMPUTER JOURNAL, 2024, 67 (01): : 236 - 252
  • [28] Traffic Flow Prediction Based on Spatial-Temporal Attention Convolutional Neural Network
    Xia Y.
    Liu M.
    Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58 (02): : 340 - 347
  • [29] Spatial-Temporal Multiscale Fusion Graph Neural Network for Traffic Flow Prediction
    Hou, Hongxin
    Ning, Nianwen
    Shi, Huaguang
    Zhou, Yi
    2022 IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering, ICITE 2022, 2022, : 272 - 277
  • [30] A Spatial-Temporal Multitask Collaborative Learning Model for Multistep Traffic Flow Prediction
    Tang, Kun
    Chen, Shuyan
    Khattak, Aemal J.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2018, 2672 (45) : 1 - 13