Safety and efficacy of transradial coronary angiography and intervention in patients older than 80 years:from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry

被引:0
|
作者
Hoyoun Won [1 ]
Wang Soo Lee [1 ]
SangWook Kim [1 ]
Byung Ryul Cho [2 ]
Young Jin Youn [3 ]
YoungHyo Lim [4 ]
MinHo Lee [5 ]
JaeHwan Lee [6 ]
SeungWoon Rha [7 ]
Korea Transradial Coronary InterventionKOTRIProspective Registry Investigators
机构
[1] Cardiovascular & Arrhythmia Center, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
[2] Division of Cardiology, Kangwon National University, Hospital
[3] Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine
[4] Division of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University
[5] Department of Cardiology, Soonchunhyang University, College of Medicine
[6] Department of Cardiology, Chungnam National University Hospital
[7] Department of Cardiology, Korea University Guro
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R54 [心脏、血管(循环系)疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Radial artery access for coronary procedures is a safe and beneficial technique. However, elderly patients have been considered as a higher risk group of access site related complications compared to younger patients. This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and safety of transradial coronary angiography or intervention in the elderly. Methods A total of 6132 patients from Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry at 20 centers were analyzed. Patients were divided into the non-elderly group(n = 5667) and the elderly(≥80 years) group(n = 465). Using propensity score matching, the elderly group(n = 465) was compared with one-to-one matched the non-elderly group(n = 465). Results After propensity score matching, mean age was 64.3 ± 10.3 years in the non-elderly group and 83.5 ± 3.3 years in the elderly group. There was no difference of procedural characteristics, procedural and fluoroscopic times.Access site cross-over rate was not different between the non-elderly group and elderly group(7.5% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.074). Bleeding complications occurred similarly in two groups(2.6% of the non-elderly group vs. 1.9% of the elderly group, P = 0.660). Access site complications were 1.9% of the non-elderly group and 0.9% of the elderly group(P = 0.263). Both of in hospital death and cardiovascular death for one year were also similar between two groups. Conclusions Transradial angiography or intervention was safe and feasible in elderly patients.Complication rates and clinical outcomes in elderly patients were comparable with those in non-elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Washimi, Soichiro
    Hashimoto, Sho
    Taniguchi, Norimasa
    Nakajima, Shunsuke
    Hata, Tetsuya
    Takahashi, Akihiko
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (06) : E796 - E801
  • [42] Safety and Efficacy of Using a Single Transradial MAC Guiding Catheter for Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Patients with STE-Myocardial Infarction (RAPID)
    Guo, Jincheng
    Chen, Wenming
    Liu, Zijing
    Wang, Guozhong
    Zhu, Fuli
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (16) : S8 - S8
  • [43] Safety and Efficacy of using a single transRAdial MAC guiding catheter for coronary angiograPhy and Intervention in patients with STE-MyocarDial infarction (RAPID)
    Guo, Jincheng
    Chen, Wenming
    Wang, Guozhong
    Xu, Rong
    Liu, Zijing
    Gan, Shunjin
    Zhang, Libin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (16) : C161 - C161
  • [44] Distal transradial access: a review of the feasibility and safety in cardiovascular angiography and intervention
    Gaojun Cai
    Haomin Huang
    Feng Li
    Ganwei Shi
    Xiaolong Yu
    Lei Yu
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 20
  • [45] Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: consummation and safety in pakistani population
    Valliani, A.
    Khan, M.
    Ahmed, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 15 : 32 - 32
  • [46] SUCCESSIVE DISTAL TRANSRADIAL APPROACH FOR CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND INTERVENTION IN THE SAME ARM
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Matsubara, Yuki
    Washimi, Soichiro
    Taniguchi, Norimasa
    Nakajima, Shunsuke
    Hata, Tetsuya
    Takahashi, Akihiko
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 1215 - 1215
  • [47] Feasibility and Safety of Elective Transradial Coronary Intervention in Asian Females
    Maddury, Jyotsna
    Kaushik, Manu
    Madhavapeddi, Aditya
    Babu, Srinivas
    Kumar, Narendra
    Varma, J. L. N.
    Alla, Venkata
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 23 (03): : 95 - 99
  • [48] In-hospital outcome differences between transradial and transfemoral coronary approaches: Data from the Korean percutaneous coronary intervention registry
    Ahn, Sung Gyun
    Lee, Jun-Won
    Youn, Young Jin
    Lee, Seung-Hwan
    Cho, Jang Hyun
    Kang, Woong Chol
    Park, Jong-Pil
    Shin, Won-Yong
    Lim, Seong-Hoon
    Choi, Yu Jeong
    Kim, Kyungsoo
    Lim, Do-Sun
    Chun, Woojung
    Kim, Ju Han
    Yoon, Junghan
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 94 (03) : 378 - 384
  • [49] Distal transradial access: a review of the feasibility and safety in cardiovascular angiography and intervention
    Cai, Gaojun
    Huang, Haomin
    Li, Feng
    Shi, Ganwei
    Yu, Xiaolong
    Yu, Lei
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [50] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between the Right and Left Radial Artery Approaches from the Korean Transradial Coronary Intervention Registry
    Park, Ji Young
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Choi, Byong Geol
    Oh, Dong Ju
    Choi, Cheol Ung
    Youn, Young-Jin
    Yoon, Junghan
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (03) : 521 - 526