Safety and efficacy of transradial coronary angiography and intervention in patients older than 80 years:from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry

被引:0
|
作者
Hoyoun Won [1 ]
Wang Soo Lee [1 ]
SangWook Kim [1 ]
Byung Ryul Cho [2 ]
Young Jin Youn [3 ]
YoungHyo Lim [4 ]
MinHo Lee [5 ]
JaeHwan Lee [6 ]
SeungWoon Rha [7 ]
Korea Transradial Coronary InterventionKOTRIProspective Registry Investigators
机构
[1] Cardiovascular & Arrhythmia Center, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
[2] Division of Cardiology, Kangwon National University, Hospital
[3] Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine
[4] Division of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University
[5] Department of Cardiology, Soonchunhyang University, College of Medicine
[6] Department of Cardiology, Chungnam National University Hospital
[7] Department of Cardiology, Korea University Guro
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R54 [心脏、血管(循环系)疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Radial artery access for coronary procedures is a safe and beneficial technique. However, elderly patients have been considered as a higher risk group of access site related complications compared to younger patients. This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and safety of transradial coronary angiography or intervention in the elderly. Methods A total of 6132 patients from Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry at 20 centers were analyzed. Patients were divided into the non-elderly group(n = 5667) and the elderly(≥80 years) group(n = 465). Using propensity score matching, the elderly group(n = 465) was compared with one-to-one matched the non-elderly group(n = 465). Results After propensity score matching, mean age was 64.3 ± 10.3 years in the non-elderly group and 83.5 ± 3.3 years in the elderly group. There was no difference of procedural characteristics, procedural and fluoroscopic times.Access site cross-over rate was not different between the non-elderly group and elderly group(7.5% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.074). Bleeding complications occurred similarly in two groups(2.6% of the non-elderly group vs. 1.9% of the elderly group, P = 0.660). Access site complications were 1.9% of the non-elderly group and 0.9% of the elderly group(P = 0.263). Both of in hospital death and cardiovascular death for one year were also similar between two groups. Conclusions Transradial angiography or intervention was safe and feasible in elderly patients.Complication rates and clinical outcomes in elderly patients were comparable with those in non-elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transradial artery coronary angiography and intervention in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease
    deBelder, AJ
    Smith, REA
    Wainwright, RJ
    Thomas, MR
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (02) : 115 - 118
  • [32] Use of Prospective Radiobrachial Angiography in Transradial Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention
    Kern, Joseph A.
    Medina, Frank A.
    Lee, Linda
    Kaur, Kiran
    Nathan, Sandeep
    Blair, John E. A.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (06) : 797 - 803
  • [33] Transradial coronary angiography and intervention:: Initial experience and learning curve
    Fernández, JS
    Santos, RC
    Rodríguez, JMV
    Gonzalez, NV
    López, GA
    Fernández, RP
    Bravo, IG
    Beiras, AC
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 633 - 633
  • [34] Best Practices for Transradial Angiography and Intervention: A Consensus Statement From the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention's Transradial Working Group
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Tremmel, Jennifer A.
    Gilchrist, Ian C.
    Shah, Pinak B.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    Shroff, Adhir R.
    Crisco, Van
    Woody, Walter
    Zoghbi, Gilbert
    Duffy, Peter L.
    Sanghvi, Kintur
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    Pyne, Christopher T.
    Skelding, Kimberly A.
    Patel, Tejas
    Pancholy, Samir B.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (02) : 228 - 236
  • [35] Transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneos coronary intervention: personal experience
    Jaafar Sadeq Aldoori
    Ali Ibrahem Mohammed
    The Egyptian Heart Journal, 71
  • [36] Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Reduces CCU Stay in Patients 80 or Older
    Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki
    Sakakura, Kenichi
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Kubo, Norifumi
    Sugawara, Yoshitaka
    Nakamura, Tomohiro
    Funayama, Hiroshi
    Ako, Junya
    Momomura, Shin-ichi
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (02) : 79 - 84
  • [37] Safety and Efficacy of Using a Single Transradial MAC Guiding Catheter for Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Guo, Jincheng
    Chen, Wenming
    Wang, Guozhong
    Liu, Zijing
    Hao, Minghui
    Xu, Min
    Zhu, Fuli
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [38] Stroke After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Transradial Intervention Report From a Japanese Multicenter Registry
    Shoji, Satoshi
    Kohsaka, Shun
    Kumamaru, Hiraku
    Sawano, Mitsuaki
    Shiraishi, Yasuyuki
    Ueda, Ikuko
    Noma, Shigetaka
    Suzuki, Masahiro
    Numasawa, Yohei
    Hayashida, Kentaro
    Yuasa, Shinsuke
    Miyata, Hiroaki
    Fukuda, Keiichi
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (12)
  • [39] SAFETY OF HEPARIN COMPARED WITH BIVALIRUDIN IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSRADIAL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Bittl, John A.
    Stables, Rod
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 1346 - 1346
  • [40] Comparison of Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Coronary Bypass Grafts
    Hirzallah, Hisham
    Amro, Ahmed
    Kusmic, Damir
    Curtis, Zachary
    Leigh, Emilia C.
    Numan, Yazan
    Parsons, Julia
    Amro, Mohammad
    Akpanudo, Sutoidem
    Sayyed, Rameez
    Elhamdani, Mehiar
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (01) : 2 - 5