Construing and testing explanations in a complex domain

被引:0
|
作者
Ramberg, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
关键词
Computer aided instruction - Computer simulation - Education - Knowledge based systems - Knowledge representation - Learning systems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Explanations were construed for an expert system in the domain of protein purification and based upon the multiple-explanation construction model (MEC model). Various explanations were construed covering different relevant aspects of the explanation space, expert-level explanations (quantitative representation), low-level explanations (qualitative representation), grounds explanations (background knowledge) and backing explanations (general abstract principles). These were tested on laboratory staff working at Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology AB in Uppsala, Sweden. The variables being tested were learning, understanding, usability, and novelty of the explanation types. The results indicate that the model is valuable in construing explanations with different 'knowledge levels' with the purpose of fulfilling the needs of experts as well as 'less-experts' covering different important aspects of the explanation space. In the context of learning, the results show that experts prefer expert-level explanations and low-level explanations whereas less-experts prefer a combination of all explanation types. A multiexplanation perspective has to be taken, where explanations covering different aspects of the explanation space on different levels have to be available to less-experts to facilitate learning from explanations in a specific complex domain. These results can have strong implications for learning, for example in the context of computer-supported education.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] WHY DO PEOPLE BELIEVE IN A JUST WORLD - TESTING EXPLANATIONS
    BENSON, DE
    SOCIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM, 1992, 12 (01) : 73 - 104
  • [42] Preferences Over Foreign Migration Testing Existing Explanations in the Gulf
    York, Erin A.
    WORLD POLITICS, 2022, 74 (03) : 443 - 475
  • [43] TESTING COMPETING EXPLANATIONS FOR THE ADOPTION OF TYPE-II POLICIES
    ELKINS, DR
    URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 1995, 30 (06) : 809 - 839
  • [44] Who Joins Trade Unions? Testing New Sociological Explanations
    Kollmeyer, Christopher
    COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2013, 12 (04) : 548 - 574
  • [45] Testing mechanistic explanations for mammalian predator responses to habitat edges
    Jana Svobodová
    Jakub Kreisinger
    Martin Šálek
    Martina Koubová
    Tomáš Albrecht
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2011, 57 : 467 - 474
  • [46] NEGATIVE EMOTION OR PROBLEM CONTENT? TESTING EXPLANATIONS OF THE PEANUTS EFFECT
    Suzuki, Shuji
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2015, 116 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [47] Testing mechanistic explanations for mammalian predator responses to habitat edges
    Svobodova, Jana
    Kreisinger, Jakub
    Salek, Martin
    Koubova, Martina
    Albrecht, Tomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 57 (03) : 467 - 474
  • [48] Field testing protocol identifies helpfulness and understandability of breathlessness explanations
    Williams, M.
    Meulen, E.
    Johnston, K.
    Lewthwaite, H.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2023, 28 : 243 - 243
  • [49] Organisation of RD departments as determinant of innovation: testing alternative explanations
    Cabello-Medina, Carmen
    Carmona-Lavado, Antonio
    Cuevas-Rodriguez, Gloria
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2011, 23 (04) : 383 - 400
  • [50] How good are students at testing alternative explanations of unseen entities?
    Lawson, AE
    Drake, N
    Johnson, J
    Kwon, YJ
    Scarpone, C
    AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 2000, 62 (04): : 249 - 255