Construing and testing explanations in a complex domain

被引:0
|
作者
Ramberg, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
关键词
Computer aided instruction - Computer simulation - Education - Knowledge based systems - Knowledge representation - Learning systems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Explanations were construed for an expert system in the domain of protein purification and based upon the multiple-explanation construction model (MEC model). Various explanations were construed covering different relevant aspects of the explanation space, expert-level explanations (quantitative representation), low-level explanations (qualitative representation), grounds explanations (background knowledge) and backing explanations (general abstract principles). These were tested on laboratory staff working at Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology AB in Uppsala, Sweden. The variables being tested were learning, understanding, usability, and novelty of the explanation types. The results indicate that the model is valuable in construing explanations with different 'knowledge levels' with the purpose of fulfilling the needs of experts as well as 'less-experts' covering different important aspects of the explanation space. In the context of learning, the results show that experts prefer expert-level explanations and low-level explanations whereas less-experts prefer a combination of all explanation types. A multiexplanation perspective has to be taken, where explanations covering different aspects of the explanation space on different levels have to be available to less-experts to facilitate learning from explanations in a specific complex domain. These results can have strong implications for learning, for example in the context of computer-supported education.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Testing competence and acceptance explanations of self-esteem
    Koch, Erika J.
    Shepperd, James A.
    SELF AND IDENTITY, 2008, 7 (01) : 54 - 74
  • [32] Testing Sensory and Cognitive Explanations of the Antisaccade Deficit in Schizophrenia
    Leonard, Carly J.
    Robinson, Benjamin M.
    Kaiser, Samuel T.
    Hahn, Britta
    McClenon, Clara
    Harvey, Alex N.
    Luck, Steven J.
    Gold, James M.
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 122 (04) : 1111 - 1120
  • [33] Testing competing explanations of black opinions on affirmative action
    Mangum, Maruice
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2008, 36 (03) : 347 - 366
  • [34] Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations
    Barclay, Andrew
    Sobolewska, Maria
    Ford, Robert
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2019, 61
  • [35] Terrorist Group Rivalries and Alliances: Testing Competing Explanations
    Phillips, Brian J.
    STUDIES IN CONFLICT & TERRORISM, 2019, 42 (11) : 997 - 1019
  • [36] Beyond determinism. A case for complex explanations and human scale in framing archaeological causal explanations
    Ion, Alexandra
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIALOGUES, 2019, 26 (01) : 10 - 12
  • [37] THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROBLEM-SOLVING AND CAUSAL EXPLANATIONS IN HISTORY DOMAIN
    CARRETERO, M
    JACOTT, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 150 - 150
  • [38] Do Users Appreciate Explanations of Recommendations? An Analysis in the Movie Domain
    Thi Ngoc Trang Tran
    Viet Man Le
    Atas, Muesluem
    Felfernig, Alexander
    Stettinger, Martin
    Popescu, Andrei
    15TH ACM CONFERENCE ON RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS (RECSYS 2021), 2021, : 645 - 650
  • [39] Metric Logic Program Explanations for Complex Separator Functions
    Kumar, Srijan
    Serra, Edoardo
    Spezzano, Francesca
    Subrahmanian, V. S.
    SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, SUM 2016, 2016, 9858 : 199 - 213
  • [40] THE PRINCIPLE OF PREFERRED BEHAVIOR - ALLOMETRIC EXPLANATIONS FOR COMPLEX FUNCTIONS
    THIESSEN, DD
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1986, 16 (06) : 637 - 638