PEM electrolyzer failure scenarios identified by failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)

被引:1
|
作者
Wismer, Samantha E. [1 ]
Jimenez, Alejandro [1 ]
Al-Douri, Ahmad [1 ]
Grabovetska, Victoriia [1 ]
Groth, Katrina M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Risk & Reliabil, Syst Risk & Reliabil Anal Lab SyRRA, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
PEM electrolyzer; FMEA; Reliability analysis; Hazard analysis; QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT; HYDROGEN; HIAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.397
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis is a promising technology for clean hydrogen production. To support safe deployments of PEM electrolyzers, we performed a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) on a lab-scale PEM electrolyzer to identify risk-significant scenarios. We identified 20 failure scenarios leading to a hydrogen release, 46 for an oxygen release, and 67 for hydrogen and oxygen mixing. Hydrogen fires or the collection of hydrogen and oxygen gas poses risk to facility personnel and surrounding equipment. The gas-water separators, pump supplying water to the electrolyzer stack, and electrolyzer stack were found to contribute to the most high-risk scenarios. Identifying these scenarios enables the mitigation of issues seen in early deployments and is a step toward a complete Quantitative Risk Assessment. The results provide a technical basis to support risk-informed safe and reliable deployment and operation of electrolyzer technologies by enabling development of safety plans, design, and operational strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1289
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prioritizing clinical trial quality assurance for photons and protons: A failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) comparison
    Taylor, Paige A.
    Miles, Elizabeth
    Hoffmann, Lone
    Kelly, Sarah M.
    Kry, Stephen F.
    Moller, Ditte Sloth
    Palmans, Hugo
    Akbarov, Kamal
    Aznar, Marianne C.
    Clementel, Enrico
    Corning, Coreen
    Effeney, Rachel
    Healy, Brendan
    Moore, Alisha
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Patel, Samir
    Shaw, Maddison
    Stock, Markus
    Lehmann, Joerg
    Clark, Catharine H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182
  • [32] Fuzzy-Based Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for Ring-Gantry Linac IGRT
    Chang, J.
    Jang, S.
    Lalonde, R.
    Heron, D.
    Huq, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E217 - E218
  • [33] Failure modes & effects analysis (FMEA) of flip chip devices attached to printed wiring boards (PWB)
    Kennedy, M
    TWENTY THIRD IEEE/CPMT INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM, 1998, : 232 - 239
  • [34] Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Tier Mask-Based Radiosurgery On Gamma Knife Icon
    Xu, Andy Y.
    Wang, Tony J. C.
    Sisti, Mike
    Wuu, C. S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E177 - E177
  • [35] Software FMEA Approach Based on Failure Modes Database
    Huang, Baiqiao
    Zhang, Hong
    Lu, Minyan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY AND SAFETY, VOLS I AND II: HIGHLY RELIABLE, EASY TO MAINTAIN AND READY TO SUPPORT, 2009, : 749 - 753
  • [36] Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA
    Xiao, Ningcong
    Huang, Hong-Zhong
    Li, Yanfeng
    He, Liping
    Jin, Tongdan
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (04) : 1162 - 1170
  • [37] FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS - BIBLIOGRAPHY
    DHILLON, BS
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1992, 32 (05): : 719 - 731
  • [38] SOFTWARE FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    REIFER, DJ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1979, 28 (03) : 247 - 249
  • [39] Troubleshooting with failure modes and effects analysis
    Papadakis, EP
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 2000, 58 (04) : 529 - 530
  • [40] Software Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
    Stadler, Jacob J.
    Seidl, Neal J.
    59TH ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2013,