PEM electrolyzer failure scenarios identified by failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)

被引:1
|
作者
Wismer, Samantha E. [1 ]
Jimenez, Alejandro [1 ]
Al-Douri, Ahmad [1 ]
Grabovetska, Victoriia [1 ]
Groth, Katrina M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Risk & Reliabil, Syst Risk & Reliabil Anal Lab SyRRA, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
PEM electrolyzer; FMEA; Reliability analysis; Hazard analysis; QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT; HYDROGEN; HIAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.397
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis is a promising technology for clean hydrogen production. To support safe deployments of PEM electrolyzers, we performed a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) on a lab-scale PEM electrolyzer to identify risk-significant scenarios. We identified 20 failure scenarios leading to a hydrogen release, 46 for an oxygen release, and 67 for hydrogen and oxygen mixing. Hydrogen fires or the collection of hydrogen and oxygen gas poses risk to facility personnel and surrounding equipment. The gas-water separators, pump supplying water to the electrolyzer stack, and electrolyzer stack were found to contribute to the most high-risk scenarios. Identifying these scenarios enables the mitigation of issues seen in early deployments and is a step toward a complete Quantitative Risk Assessment. The results provide a technical basis to support risk-informed safe and reliable deployment and operation of electrolyzer technologies by enabling development of safety plans, design, and operational strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1289
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA): Based Quality Management Program for Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Xu, Y.
    Bhatnagar, J.
    Bednarz, G.
    Flickinger, J. C., Sr.
    Arai, Y.
    Vacsulka, J.
    Feng, W.
    Monaco, E.
    Niranjan, A.
    Lunsford, L. D.
    Huq, M. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E499 - E499
  • [12] Risk analysis of geothermal power plants using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) technique
    Feili, Hamid Reza
    Akar, Navid
    Lotfizadeh, Hossein
    Bairampour, Mohammad
    Nasiri, Sina
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 72 : 69 - 76
  • [13] Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) for Eye Plaque Brachytherapy
    Lee, Y.
    Huynh, J.
    Hamilton, R.
    Kim, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3163 - 3163
  • [14] Critical analysis of failure modes using FMEA and digraph approach
    Venkatesh, M.A.
    Pal, D.K.
    Basu, S.K.
    Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), Part PR: Production Engineering Division, 2002, 82 (MAR.): : 51 - 55
  • [15] Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) of Honeypot-Based Cybersecurity Experiment for IoT
    Haseeb, Junaid
    Mansoori, Masood
    Welch, Ian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE 46TH CONFERENCE ON LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS (LCN 2021), 2021, : 645 - 648
  • [16] Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) on Xoft®
    Palaniswaamy, G.
    Richardson, S.
    Rangaraj, D.
    Mutic, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [17] FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) IMPLEMENTATION
    Rojas Lema, Sandra
    3C TECNOLOGIA, 2019, 8 (01): : 64 - 74
  • [18] Failure Analysis of FMEA
    Bluvband, Zigmund
    Grabov, Pavel
    ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2009 PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 345 - 348
  • [19] Risk evaluation of failure modes due to hierarchic failure causes in FMEA
    Jang, Hyeon Ae
    Hong, Sung-Hoon
    Lee, Min Koo
    Kwon, Hyuck Moo
    ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 2015, 6 (02): : 383 - 390
  • [20] Failure modes and effects analysis
    Passarella, Claudio (cpassarella@liutaioces.com), 2018, Putman Publishing Company (31):