Enhancing LAI estimation using multispectral imagery and machine learning: A comparison between reflectance-based and vegetation indices-based approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Chatterjee, Sumantra [1 ]
Baath, Gurjinder S. [1 ]
Sapkota, Bala Ram [1 ,2 ]
Flynn, K. Colton [3 ]
Smith, Douglas R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Res, Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, 720 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, 808 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
UAV; Leaf area index; Corn; Vegetation index; Canopy reflectance; LEAF-AREA INDEX; PRODUCTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2024.109790
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Leaf area index (LAI) is a critical growth parameter in precision agricultural applications but estimating LAI across large and complex fields is challenging. Remote sensing approaches, particularly unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)-based remote sensing, can offer on demand, cost-effective solutions. While vegetation indices (VIs) are commonly used for LAI estimation with multispectral imagery, they often face issues such as inconsistency and saturation in dense crop canopies, especially in late growth stages of crops like corn ( Zea Mays L.). Alternatively, canopy spectral reflectance, if used directly with advanced statistical tools like machine learning, can potentially overcome these limitations of VI-based models and provide more consistent and accurate LAI predictions. This research used a large diverse dataset of LAI data collected from corn experimental plots treated with seven planting times in three different field locations from 2022 to 2023. A side-by-side performance comparison of reflectance-based models and VI-based models was conducted for LAI predictions across multiple datasets, categorized based on six different crop growth stages, three field locations and all combined, using five different machine learning algorithms. Machine learning modeling was executed for each dataset via k-fold cross- validation using 80% data, and the model performance was externally tested with the remaining 20% independent data. Results demonstrated that reflectance-based models outperformed VI-based models, especially at mid- to late vegetative growth (5--15%) and silking stages (25%). The superior performance of reflectance-bands was regulated by red edge and near infrared bands due to their greater sensitivity to higher LAI. However, VI- based models performed better at early vegetative growth stages, primarily due to the effectiveness of soil- adjusted indices like Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI). Machine learning algorithms such as K Neighbors Regressor and Extra Tree Regressor were most effective for modeling LAI, regardless of whether reflectance-based or VI-based approaches were used. Findings suggest that the direct use of canopy spectral reflectance with machine learning algorithms could enhance LAI predictions, benefiting precision agriculture applications in dense canopy crops like corn.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between Deep Learning and Tree-Based Machine Learning Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Saha, Sunil
    Roy, Jagabandhu
    Hembram, Tusar Kanti
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Dikshit, Abhirup
    Abdul Maulud, Khairul Nizam
    Alamri, Abdullah M.
    WATER, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [42] Detection of Wet Riparian Areas using Very High Resolution Multispectral UAS Imagery Based on a Feature-based Machine Learning Algorithm
    Mahboubi, Masoume
    Belcore, Elena
    Pontoglio, Emanuele
    Matrone, Francesca
    Lingua, Andrea
    25TH AGILE CONFERENCE ON GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE SERVICE OF GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 3
  • [43] Development of machine learning models for estimating wheat biophysical variables using satellite-based vegetation indices
    Jamali, Mohsen
    Bakhshandeh, Esmaeil
    Yeganeh, Bijan
    Ozdogan, Mutlu
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2024, 73 (01) : 498 - 513
  • [44] Comparative analysis of vegetation indices, non-parametric and physical retrieval methods for monitoring nitrogen in wheat using UAV-based multispectral imagery
    Liu, Yong
    Cheng, Tao
    Zhu, Yan
    Tian, Yongchao
    Cao, Weixing
    Yao, Xia
    Wang, Ni
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 7362 - 7365
  • [45] Machine Learning Based Hybrid Approach for Estimation of Jute Area Using Optical and Microwave Satellite Imagery
    Das, Rituparna
    Das, Prabir Kumar
    Chakraborty, Abhishek
    Pandey, Sharmistha B.
    AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [46] Comparison of high-resolution NAIP and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for natural vegetation communities classification using machine learning approaches
    Bhatt, Parth
    Maclean, Ann L.
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 60 (01)
  • [47] Estimation of vegetation water content and photosynthetic tissue area from spectral reflectance: a comparison of indices based on liquid water and chlorophyll absorption features
    Sims, DA
    Gamon, JA
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 84 (04) : 526 - 537
  • [48] Comparison and assessment of different object-based classifications using machine learning algorithms and UAVs multispectral imagery: a case study in a citrus orchard and an onion crop
    Modica, Giuseppe
    De Luca, Giandomenico
    Messina, Gaetano
    Pratico, Salvatore
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 54 (01) : 431 - 460
  • [49] Estimation of geometric and structural parameters in a super-intensive almond (Prunus dulcis) orchard from multispectral vegetation indices derived from UAV-based imagery
    Llorens, J.
    Escola, A.
    Casanas, E.
    Rosell-Polo, J. R.
    Arno, J.
    Martinez-Casasnovas, J. A.
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE'21, 2021, : 129 - 135
  • [50] Estimation of soil liquefaction using artificial intelligence techniques: an extended comparison between machine and deep learning approaches
    Sehmusoglu, Eyyup Hakan
    Kurnaz, Talas Fikret
    Erden, Caner
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2025, 84 (05)