Enhancing LAI estimation using multispectral imagery and machine learning: A comparison between reflectance-based and vegetation indices-based approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Chatterjee, Sumantra [1 ]
Baath, Gurjinder S. [1 ]
Sapkota, Bala Ram [1 ,2 ]
Flynn, K. Colton [3 ]
Smith, Douglas R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Res, Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, 720 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, 808 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
UAV; Leaf area index; Corn; Vegetation index; Canopy reflectance; LEAF-AREA INDEX; PRODUCTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2024.109790
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Leaf area index (LAI) is a critical growth parameter in precision agricultural applications but estimating LAI across large and complex fields is challenging. Remote sensing approaches, particularly unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)-based remote sensing, can offer on demand, cost-effective solutions. While vegetation indices (VIs) are commonly used for LAI estimation with multispectral imagery, they often face issues such as inconsistency and saturation in dense crop canopies, especially in late growth stages of crops like corn ( Zea Mays L.). Alternatively, canopy spectral reflectance, if used directly with advanced statistical tools like machine learning, can potentially overcome these limitations of VI-based models and provide more consistent and accurate LAI predictions. This research used a large diverse dataset of LAI data collected from corn experimental plots treated with seven planting times in three different field locations from 2022 to 2023. A side-by-side performance comparison of reflectance-based models and VI-based models was conducted for LAI predictions across multiple datasets, categorized based on six different crop growth stages, three field locations and all combined, using five different machine learning algorithms. Machine learning modeling was executed for each dataset via k-fold cross- validation using 80% data, and the model performance was externally tested with the remaining 20% independent data. Results demonstrated that reflectance-based models outperformed VI-based models, especially at mid- to late vegetative growth (5--15%) and silking stages (25%). The superior performance of reflectance-bands was regulated by red edge and near infrared bands due to their greater sensitivity to higher LAI. However, VI- based models performed better at early vegetative growth stages, primarily due to the effectiveness of soil- adjusted indices like Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI). Machine learning algorithms such as K Neighbors Regressor and Extra Tree Regressor were most effective for modeling LAI, regardless of whether reflectance-based or VI-based approaches were used. Findings suggest that the direct use of canopy spectral reflectance with machine learning algorithms could enhance LAI predictions, benefiting precision agriculture applications in dense canopy crops like corn.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Estimation of the Leaf Nitrogen Content of Apple Tree Canopies Based on Multispectral Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery and Machine Learning Methods
    Zhao, Xin
    Zhao, Zeyi
    Zhao, Fengnian
    Liu, Jiangfan
    Li, Zhaoyang
    Wang, Xingpeng
    Gao, Yang
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [32] Estimation of Leaf Area Index Based on Machine Learning/PROSAIL Using Optical Satellite Imagery
    Lee, Jaese
    Kang, Yoojin
    Son, Bokyung
    Im, Jungho
    Jang, Keunchang
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 37 (06) : 1719 - 1729
  • [33] Comparison of machine-learning methods for above-ground biomass estimation based on Landsat imagery
    Wu, Chaofan
    Shen, Huanhuan
    Shen, Aihua
    Deng, Jinsong
    Gan, Muye
    Zhu, Jinxia
    Xu, Hongwei
    Wang, Ke
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 10
  • [34] Biomass estimation of spring wheat with machine learning methods using UAV-based multispectral imaging
    Atkinson Amorim, Joao Gustavo
    Schreiber, Lincoln Vinicius
    Quadros de Souza, Mirayr Raul
    Negreiros, Marcelo
    Susin, Altamiro
    Bredemeier, Christian
    Trentin, Carolina
    Vian, Andre Luis
    Andrades-Filho, Clodis de Oliveira
    Doering, Dionisio
    Parraga, Adriane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 43 (13) : 4758 - 4773
  • [35] Estimation of slope stability using ensemble-based hybrid machine learning approaches
    Ragam, Prashanth
    Kumar, N. Kushal
    Ajith, Jubilson E.
    Karthik, Guntha
    Himanshu, Vivek Kumar
    Machupalli, Divya Sree
    Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar Ramesh
    FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2024, 11
  • [36] Oil Palm Yield Estimation Based on Vegetation and Humidity Indices Generated from Satellite Images and Machine Learning Techniques
    Watson-Hernandez, Fernando
    Gomez-Calderon, Natalia
    da Silva, Rouverson Pereira
    AGRIENGINEERING, 2022, 4 (01): : 279 - 291
  • [37] Wheat yield estimation using remote sensing data based on machine learning approaches
    Cheng, Enhui
    Zhang, Bing
    Peng, Dailiang
    Zhong, Liheng
    Yu, Le
    Liu, Yao
    Xiao, Chenchao
    Li, Cunjun
    Li, Xiaoyi
    Chen, Yue
    Ye, Huichun
    Wang, Hongye
    Yu, Ruyi
    Hu, Jinkang
    Yang, Songlin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [38] Trailer Mass Estimation Using System Model-Based and Machine Learning Approaches
    Korayem, Amin Habibnejad
    Khajepour, Amir
    Fidan, Baris
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (11) : 12536 - 12546
  • [39] Comparison of Phenology Estimated from Reflectance-Based Indices and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) Observations in a Temperate Forest Using GPP-Based Phenology as the Standard
    Lu, Xiaoliang
    Liu, Zhunqiao
    Zhou, Yuyu
    Liu, Yaling
    An, Shuqing
    Tang, Jianwu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [40] Predicting within-field variability in grain yield and protein content of winter wheat using UAV-based multispectral imagery and machine learning approaches
    Zhou, Xinbin
    Kono, Yusuke
    Win, Aung
    Matsui, Tsutomu
    Tanaka, Takashi S. T.
    PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2021, 24 (02) : 137 - 151