Enhancing LAI estimation using multispectral imagery and machine learning: A comparison between reflectance-based and vegetation indices-based approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Chatterjee, Sumantra [1 ]
Baath, Gurjinder S. [1 ]
Sapkota, Bala Ram [1 ,2 ]
Flynn, K. Colton [3 ]
Smith, Douglas R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Res, Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, 720 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, 808 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
UAV; Leaf area index; Corn; Vegetation index; Canopy reflectance; LEAF-AREA INDEX; PRODUCTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2024.109790
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Leaf area index (LAI) is a critical growth parameter in precision agricultural applications but estimating LAI across large and complex fields is challenging. Remote sensing approaches, particularly unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)-based remote sensing, can offer on demand, cost-effective solutions. While vegetation indices (VIs) are commonly used for LAI estimation with multispectral imagery, they often face issues such as inconsistency and saturation in dense crop canopies, especially in late growth stages of crops like corn ( Zea Mays L.). Alternatively, canopy spectral reflectance, if used directly with advanced statistical tools like machine learning, can potentially overcome these limitations of VI-based models and provide more consistent and accurate LAI predictions. This research used a large diverse dataset of LAI data collected from corn experimental plots treated with seven planting times in three different field locations from 2022 to 2023. A side-by-side performance comparison of reflectance-based models and VI-based models was conducted for LAI predictions across multiple datasets, categorized based on six different crop growth stages, three field locations and all combined, using five different machine learning algorithms. Machine learning modeling was executed for each dataset via k-fold cross- validation using 80% data, and the model performance was externally tested with the remaining 20% independent data. Results demonstrated that reflectance-based models outperformed VI-based models, especially at mid- to late vegetative growth (5--15%) and silking stages (25%). The superior performance of reflectance-bands was regulated by red edge and near infrared bands due to their greater sensitivity to higher LAI. However, VI- based models performed better at early vegetative growth stages, primarily due to the effectiveness of soil- adjusted indices like Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI). Machine learning algorithms such as K Neighbors Regressor and Extra Tree Regressor were most effective for modeling LAI, regardless of whether reflectance-based or VI-based approaches were used. Findings suggest that the direct use of canopy spectral reflectance with machine learning algorithms could enhance LAI predictions, benefiting precision agriculture applications in dense canopy crops like corn.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying effect of maize tassels on LAI estimation based on multispectral imagery and machine learning methods
    Shao, Mingchao
    Nie, Chenwei
    Zhang, Aijun
    Shi, Liangsheng
    Zha, Yuanyuan
    Xu, Honggen
    Yang, Hongye
    Yu, Xun
    Bai, Yi
    Liu, Shuaibing
    Cheng, Minghan
    Lin, Tao
    Cui, Ningbo
    Wu, Wenbin
    Jin, Xiuliang
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 211
  • [2] Fusion of Multispectral Aerial Imagery and Vegetation Indices for Machine Learning-Based Ground Classification
    Zhang, Yanchao
    Yang, Wen
    Sun, Ying
    Chang, Christine
    Yu, Jiya
    Zhang, Wenbo
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [3] Improving estimation of LAI dynamic by fusion of morphological and vegetation indices based on UAV imagery
    Qiao, Lang
    Gao, Dehua
    Zhao, Ruomei
    Tang, Weijie
    An, Lulu
    Li, Minzan
    Sun, Hong
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2022, 192
  • [4] Leaf area index (LAI) prediction using machine learning and UAV based vegetation indices
    Hussain, Saddam
    Teshome, Fitsum T.
    Tulu, Boaz B.
    Awoke, Girma Worku
    Hailegnaw, Niguss Solomon
    Bayabil, Haimanote K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2025, 168
  • [5] Estimation of canopy water content in maize using machine learning and multispectral vegetation indices: comparison of Adaboost regression and other methods
    de Magalhaes, Leonardo Pinto
    Rossi, Fabricio
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 18 (04)
  • [6] Absolute radiometric calibration and validation of a UAV multispectral sensor: a comparison between the irradiance-based method and reflectance-based method
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Hengyang
    JOURNAL OF SPATIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 66 (03) : 481 - 492
  • [7] Enhancing the estimation of cadmium content in rice leaves by integrating vegetation indices and color indices using machine learning
    Huang, Xiaoyun
    Chen, Shengxi
    Fu, Tianling
    Fan, Chengwu
    Chen, Hongxing
    Zhang, Song
    Chen, Hui
    Qin, Song
    Gao, Zhenran
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2025, 290
  • [8] Soil salinity estimation of sparse vegetation based on multispectral image processing and machine learning
    Mejia-Cabrera, Heber, I
    Vilcheza, Daniel
    Tuesta-Monteza, Victor
    Forero, Manuel G.
    APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XLIII, 2020, 11510
  • [9] Estimation of Winter Wheat Yield Using Multiple Temporal Vegetation Indices Derived from UAV-Based Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imagery
    Liu, Yu
    Sun, Liang
    Liu, Binhui
    Wu, Yongfeng
    Ma, Juncheng
    Zhang, Wenying
    Wang, Bianyin
    Chen, Zhaoyang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [10] Estimation of Crop Biomass and Leaf Area Index from Multitemporal and Multispectral Imagery Using Machine Learning Approaches
    Gahrouei, Omid
    McNairn, Heather
    Hosseini, Mehdi
    Homayouni, Saeid
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 46 (01) : 84 - 99