Risk-based regulation of discharges whose risk is it anyway?

被引:0
|
作者
WSP Environmental [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
不详 [3 ]
机构
来源
Water Wastewater Int | 2007年 / 3卷 / 22-23期
关键词
Contamination - Environmental impact - Flow rate - Risk analysis - Water pollution - Water pollution control - Water quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Environmental Agency in the UK, is considering to revise its method of regulating discharges to the water environment, using risk-based principles known as the Hampton Principles. The agency is to adopt Operator and Pollution Risk Appraisal system (OPRA), which has already been applied to other regulatory regimes such as Pollution Prevention and Control and Waste Management, for the water quality regime. The Environmental Industries Commission's (ETC's) Water Pollution Control Working Group, which represents over 80 companies supplying water pollution control technologies and services, is supporting the EA's proposal but raising several issues of concern. Thess issues include the use of prescriptive conditions to trigger risk assessment, continued use of upper bound limits on flow rate and concentration within discharge consents and the impact of this on water efficiency, and the impact of the new water quality regime on efforts to clean up existing water contamination.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms
    Conko, Gregory
    Kershen, Drew L.
    Miller, Henry
    Parrott, Wayne A.
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (05) : 493 - 503
  • [22] Risk-based regulation and certification of autonomous transport systems
    Johnsen, S. O.
    Hoem, A.
    Stalhane, T.
    Jenssen, G.
    Moen, T.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 1791 - 1799
  • [23] The ascent and descent of banks' risk-based capital regulation
    Mero, Katalin
    JOURNAL OF BANKING REGULATION, 2021, 22 (04) : 308 - 318
  • [24] Blockchain Technology and Financial Regulation: A Risk-Based Approach to the Regulation of ICOs
    Collomb, Alexis
    De Filippi, Primavera
    Sok, Klara
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2019, 10 (02) : 263 - 314
  • [25] Fracture risk assessment after BMD examination: whose job is it, anyway?
    Allin, S.
    Munce, S.
    Carlin, L.
    Butt, D.
    Tu, K.
    Hawker, G.
    Sale, J.
    Jaglal, S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 (05) : 1445 - 1453
  • [26] Risk attitudes in risk-based design: Considering risk attitude using utility theory in risk-based design
    Van Bossuyt, Douglas
    Hoyle, Chris
    Tumer, Irem Y.
    Dong, Andy
    AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, 2012, 26 (04): : 393 - 406
  • [27] Fighting Independent Risk Assessment of Talc and Glyphosate: Whose Benefit Is It Anyway?
    Morabia, Alfredo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 109 (07) : 955 - 956
  • [28] Fracture risk assessment after BMD examination: whose job is it, anyway?
    S. Allin
    S. Munce
    L. Carlin
    D. Butt
    K. Tu
    G. Hawker
    J. Sale
    S. Jaglal
    Osteoporosis International, 2014, 25 : 1445 - 1453
  • [29] Risk-Based Anticoagulation
    Mendez-Lopez, Max
    Grant-Villegas, Stanley
    Romero-Polini, Andres
    UNIVERSITAS MEDICA, 2014, 55 (04): : 390 - 406
  • [30] An evaluation of a risk-based environmental regulation in Brazil: Limitations to risk management of hazardous installations
    NaimeDr, Andre
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 63 : 35 - 43