Do LEGO Mindstorms motivate students in CS1?

被引:12
|
作者
Department of Computer Science andInformation Systems, Texas A and M University - Commerce, Commerce, TX 75429, United States [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
机构
来源
SIGCSE Bull. Inroads | 2009年 / 1卷 / 438-442期
关键词
Robot programming - Students;
D O I
10.1145/1539024.1509019
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the research study described in this paper was to investigate the effectiveness of using LEGO Mindstorms robotic activities to influence student motivation in an introductory university computer programming course. Various aspects relating to student motivation were measured using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Tests revealed no statistically significant differences between groups in relation to intrinsic goal orientation, task value, control of learning beliefs, self-efficacy, and test anxiety at the alpha = .05 level. The experiment did detect a statistically significant difference between groups in relation to extrinsic goal orientation. The LEGO group, however, showed a larger decrease in levels of extrinsic goal orientation, suggesting they were less motivated in learning the material for rewards such as grades. While this is not necessarily a bad thing, ideally a decline in extrinsic goal orientation would be accompanied by a statistically significant increase in intrinsic goal orientation suggesting students were instead motivated because they were interested in the content of the material. This was not the case in this study. Despite the lack of positive quantitative results, responses to student follow-up questions suggest that at least some of the students enjoyed the LEGO Mindstorms activities. A discussion of possible factors influencing these results is provided.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Introducing embedded design concepts to freshmen and sophomore engineering students with LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT
    Sharad, Shekhar
    2007 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, Proceedings, 2007, : 119 - 120
  • [42] The Correctness of the Mental Model of Arrays After Instruction for CS1 Students
    Mazumder, Syeda Fatema
    Perez-Quinones, Manuel A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 55TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, SIGCSE 2024, VOL. 1, 2024, : 806 - 811
  • [43] First-year students' impressions of pair programming in CS1
    University of California, San Diego
    不详
    不详
    不详
    ACM J. Educ. Resour. Comput., 2008, 4
  • [44] Performance Analysis and Interviews of Non-CS-Major Students Sanctioned for Cheating in CS1
    Pang, Ashley
    Vahid, Frank
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CONFERENCE INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, VOL 1, ITICSE 2024, 2024, : 374 - 380
  • [45] To Motivate CS Students, Connect with People in Need
    Stantchev, Vladimir
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2009, 52 (07) : 8 - 8
  • [46] What Do "CS1" and "CS2" Mean? Investigating Differences In the Early Courses
    Hertz, Matthew
    SIGCSE 10: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2010, : 199 - 203
  • [47] Emphasizing design in CS1
    East Tennessee State Univ, Johnson City, United States
    SIGCSE Bull, (315-318):
  • [48] Designing a CURE for CS1
    Buffardi, Kevin
    Brooks, Joana
    Alexander, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CONFERENCE INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, VOL 1, ITICSE 2024, 2024, : 660 - 666
  • [49] Progressive Assignment in CS1
    Djordjevic, Mirela
    ITICSE 2009: PROCEEDING OF THE 2009 ACM SIGSE ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2009, : 346 - 346
  • [50] Who Drops CS1?
    Horton, Diane
    Craig, Michelle
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE'14), 2014, : 712 - 713