Do LEGO Mindstorms motivate students in CS1?

被引:12
|
作者
Department of Computer Science andInformation Systems, Texas A and M University - Commerce, Commerce, TX 75429, United States [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
机构
来源
SIGCSE Bull. Inroads | 2009年 / 1卷 / 438-442期
关键词
Robot programming - Students;
D O I
10.1145/1539024.1509019
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the research study described in this paper was to investigate the effectiveness of using LEGO Mindstorms robotic activities to influence student motivation in an introductory university computer programming course. Various aspects relating to student motivation were measured using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Tests revealed no statistically significant differences between groups in relation to intrinsic goal orientation, task value, control of learning beliefs, self-efficacy, and test anxiety at the alpha = .05 level. The experiment did detect a statistically significant difference between groups in relation to extrinsic goal orientation. The LEGO group, however, showed a larger decrease in levels of extrinsic goal orientation, suggesting they were less motivated in learning the material for rewards such as grades. While this is not necessarily a bad thing, ideally a decline in extrinsic goal orientation would be accompanied by a statistically significant increase in intrinsic goal orientation suggesting students were instead motivated because they were interested in the content of the material. This was not the case in this study. Despite the lack of positive quantitative results, responses to student follow-up questions suggest that at least some of the students enjoyed the LEGO Mindstorms activities. A discussion of possible factors influencing these results is provided.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LEGO MINDSTORMS-BASED CURRICULUM FOR DESIGN AND ERGONOMICS STUDENTS
    Garrett, David W.
    Underwood, Peter J.
    Jun, Gyuchan Thomas
    DESIGN FOR HARMONIES, VOL 8: DESIGN EDUCATION, 2013,
  • [22] Teaching Programming for High School Students Using the Lego Mindstorms Robot
    Barreto, Valeria Banachi
    L'Erario, Alexandre
    Fabri, Jose Augusto
    2015 10TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2015,
  • [23] What Do CS1 Syllabi Reveal About Our Expectations of Introductory Programming Students?
    Becker, Brett A.
    Fitzpatrick, Thomas
    SIGCSE '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 50TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, : 1011 - 1017
  • [24] Teaching Students Java']Java Bytecode Using Lego Mindstorms Robots
    Jipping, Michael J.
    Calka, Cameron
    O'Neill, Brian
    Padilla, Christopher R.
    SIGCSE 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-EIGHTH SIGCSE TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, : 170 - 174
  • [25] Using the New Lego MindStorms EV3 Robotics Platform in CS Courses
    Klassner, Frank
    Schafer, Ben
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE'14), 2014, : 745 - 746
  • [26] How do Quiz and Homework Submission Times Affect Students' Performance in a Flipped CS1 Class?
    Harvey, Leslie
    Aggarwal, Ashish
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 ACM CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL COMPUTING EDUCATION RESEARCH, ICER 2020, 2020, : 314 - 314
  • [27] Exploring Creativity Expectation in CS1 Students' View of Programming
    Isomottonen, Ville
    Lakanen, Antti-Jussi
    Nieminen, Paavo
    2020 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2020), 2020,
  • [28] Evaluating an Alternative CS1 for Students with Prior Programming Experience
    Kirkpatrick, Michael S.
    Mayfield, Chris
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM SIGCSE TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE'17), 2017, : 333 - 338
  • [29] Thematic Analysis of Students' Reflections on Pair Programming in CS1
    Celepkolu, Mehmet
    Boyer, Kristy Elizabeth
    SIGCSE'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2018, : 771 - 776
  • [30] An Untapped Recruitment Pool: Undecided Students in CS1 Courses
    Lehman, Kathleen J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 RESEARCH ON EQUITY AND SUSTAINED PARTICIPATION IN ENGINEERING, COMPUTING, AND TECHNOLOGY (RESPECT), 2019,