SPI agility: How to navigate improvement projects

被引:8
|
作者
Aalborg University, IT University of Gothenburg, Georgia State University [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
机构
来源
Softw. Process Improv. Pract. | 2007年 / 3卷 / 267-281期
关键词
Adaptive systems - Process engineering - Project management;
D O I
10.1002/spip.309
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we argue that today's changing business environment calls for agile Software Process Improvement (SPI) practices. The study combines experiences from 18 SPI projects executed from 1998 to 2002 at Ericsson in Gothenburg with insights from SPI and agility theory. We suggest that agile SPI practices are both effective and flexible; they employ adaptive governance mechanisms at the corporate level; and they combine different tactics on the project level. We identify and compare two different tactics for SPI projects. Inspired by procedural thinking, the first tactic, the supertanker, employs process-push and aims for efficient process development and diffusion. On the basis of adaptive thinking, the second tactic, the motorboat, facilitates practice-pull and aims for adaptive process development and diffusion. We also discuss how agile SPI practices require understanding of the different types of waters in which the two tactics navigate effectively. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] HOW TO NAVIGATE THE RIVER-OF-TIME
    SCHLESINGER, GN
    PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 1985, 35 (138): : 91 - 92
  • [42] How to Navigate Fisheries Education and Employment
    Carlson, Andrew K.
    Dunmall, Karen M.
    Boucek, Ross E.
    Cole, Nicholas W.
    Kerns, Janice A.
    Krogman, Rebecca M.
    Lloyd, M. Clint
    Nguyen, Vivian M.
    Wendt, Tracy R.
    White, Shannon L.
    Wilson, Kyle L.
    FISHERIES, 2015, 40 (05) : 196 - 197
  • [43] How to Incorporate Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Projects in Your Training
    Siddique, Shazia Mehmood
    Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash
    Newberry, Carolyn
    Mathews, Simon
    Khungar, Vandana
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : 1564 - 1568
  • [44] HOW TO ESTIMATE BREAK-EVEN POINTS FOR SAWMILL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
    HARPOLE, GB
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 1977, 27 (04) : 54 - 56
  • [45] How diving flies navigate in for the kill
    Kaimaki, Domna-Maria
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 224 (17):
  • [46] HOW TO EVALUATE SAVINGS FROM POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.
    Bergman, A.
    Plant Engineering (Barrington, Illinois), 1981, 35 (07): : 56 - 60
  • [47] HOW TO USE EFQM FOR EXPLAINING IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND PROVIDING ROAD MAP
    Shahroudi, Kambiz
    Zaeimkohan, Nazanin
    CHANGE MANAGEMENT IN A DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, : 194 - 201
  • [48] System based SQA and implementation of SPI for successful projects
    Lee, JW
    Jung, SH
    Park, SC
    Lee, YJ
    Jang, YC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION, 2005, : 494 - 499
  • [49] Factors associated with the software development agility of successful projects
    Sheffield, Jim
    Lemetayer, Julien
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (03) : 459 - 472
  • [50] Defects and Agility: Localization Issues in Agile Development Projects
    Ressin, Malte
    Abdelnour-Nocera, Jose
    Smith, Andy
    AGILE PROCESSES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND EXTREME PROGRAMMING, 2011, 77 : 316 - 317