Influence of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage and brewery sludges on biogas production and sludge quality

被引：0

作者：

Pecharaply, Athapol ^{[1
]}

Parkpian, Preeda ^{[1
]}

Annachhatre, Ajit P. ^{[1
]}

Jugsujinda, Aroon ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Environmental Engineering and Management, School of Environmental, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Patumthani 12120, Thailand

[2] Wetland Biogeochemistry Institute, School of the Coast and Environment, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, United States

[3] Wetland Biogeochemistry Institute, School of the Coast and Environment, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-7511, United States

来源：

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering | 2007年 / 42卷 / 07期

关键词：

This research investigated operating parameters and treatment efficiency for the digestion of sewage and brewery sludge. The prime objective of this study was to enhance the quality of treated sludge for use as agriculture fertilizer and to enhance biogas production, a by-product that can be used as an energy source. Three bench-scale completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR) anaerobic digesters were operated at mesophilic condition (36 ± 0.2°C). A mixture of sewage and brewery sludge were used as substrates at ratios of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100, based on wet weight basis (w/w). For each digester, the solids retention times (SRT) were 20 days. The organic loading and volatile solids loading were between 1.3-2.2 kg chemical oxygen demand (COD)/m3/day and 0.9-1.5 kg/m3/day, respectively. The digester fed with brewery sludge as co-substrate yielded higher treatment efficiency than sewage sludge alone. The removal efficiencies measured in terms of soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD) and total chemical oxygen demands (TCOD) ranged from 40% to 75% and 22% to 35%, respectively. Higher SCOD and TCOD removal efficiencies were obtained when higher fractions of brewery sludge was added to the substrate mixture. Removal efficiency was lowest for sewage sludge alone. Measured volatile solid (VS) reduction ranged from 15% to 20%. Adding a higher fraction of brewery sludge to the mixture increased the VS reduction percentage. The biogas production and methane yield also increased with increase in brewery sludge addition to the digester mixture. The methane content present in biogas of each digester exceeded 70% indicating the system was functioning as an anaerobic process. Likewise the ratio of brewery sewage influenced not only the treatment efficiency but also improved quality of treated sludge by lowering number of pathogen (less than 2 MPN/g of dried sludge) and maintaining a high nutrient concentration of nitrogen (N) 3.2-4.2%, phosphorus (P) 1.9-3.2% and potassium (K) 0.95-0.96%. The heavy metals, chromium (Cr) and copper (Cu) remaining in digested sludge were present at relatively high levels (Cr 1,849-4,230 and Cu 930-2,526 mg/kg dried sludge). The metals were present as organic matter-bound and sulfide-bound fractions that are not soluble and available. The digested sludge could be safely applied to soil as a plant nutrient source, without fecal coliforms or heavy metals risk. A sludge mixture ratio of 25:75 (sewage:brewery), which generated the higher nutrient concentrations (N = 4.22%, P = 3.20% and K = 0.95%), biogas production and treatment efficiency meet the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) safety guidelines required for agricultural application. Biogas production and methane at the 25:75 ratio (sewage:brewery) yielded highest amount of VS removed (0.65 m3/kg) and CODremoved (220 L/kg), respectively. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Journal article (JA)

引用

页码：911 / 923

共 50 条

[31] Food Waste Co-Digestion with Microwave Pre-Treated Sewage Sludge to Enhance Biogas Production Through Anaerobic Digestion
Palanisamy, Kumaran
David, Hephzibah
Muthaiyah, Gopinathan
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND UTILITY EXHIBITION ON GREEN ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (ICUE 2018), 2018,
[32] Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Waste Wafers from Confectionery Production with Sewage Sludge
Pilarska, Agnieszka A.
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2018, 27 (01): : 237 - 245
[33] Potentiality of Fruit and Vegetable Waste by Anaerobic Co-digestion with Municipal Sewage Sludge and Biogas Yield
Anhuradha, S.
Arrrivukkarasan, S.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND CHEMICALS FROM BIOMASS (NCECB), 2020, 2225
[34] Anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of sewage sludge with glycerol: Enhanced biohydrogen production
Rivero, M.
Solera, R.
Perez, M.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (06) : 2481 - 2488
[35] Feasibility of biohydrogen production by anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge
Kim, SH
Han, SK
Shin, HS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2004, 29 (15) : 1607 - 1616
[36] Enhancing thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with biogas residue biochar
Liu, Hongbo
Wang, Xingkang
Fang, Yueying
Lai, Wenjia
Xu, Suyun
Lichtfouse, Eric
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 188 : 465 - 475
[37] Enhancement of biogas potential of primary sludge by co-digestion with cow manure and brewery sludge
Nansubuga, Irene
Banadda, Noble
Babu, Mohammed
De Vrieze, Jo
Verstraete, Willy
Rabaey, Korneel
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 8 (04) : 86 - 94
[38] Experiments and Modeling for Flexible Biogas Production by Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Sewage Sludge
Liu, Yiyun
Huang, Tao
Li, Xiaofeng
Huang, Jingjing
Peng, Daoping
Maurer, Claudia
Kranert, Martin
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (04)
[39] Mixing strategies of high solids anaerobic co-digestion using food waste with sewage sludge for enhanced biogas production
Latha, K.
Velraj, R.
Shanmugam, P.
Sivanesan, S.
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 210 : 388 - 400
[40] Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge, food waste and yard waste: Synergistic enhancement on process stability and biogas production
Mu, Lan
Zhang, Lei
Zhu, Kongyun
Ma, Jiao
Ifran, Muhammad
Li, Aimin
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 704

← 1 2 3 4 5 →