Establishing Automatic Classification Models for Forest Cover Using Airborne Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Cheng-En [1 ]
Wang, Uen-Hao [2 ]
Lin, Guo-Sheng [1 ]
Wang, Pei-Jung [2 ]
Jan, Jihn-Fa [3 ]
Chen, Yi-Chin [1 ]
Wang, Su-Fen [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Geography, National Changhua University of Education, 1 Jinde Rd., Changhua City,50007, Taiwan
[2] Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, 53 Nanhai Rd., Taipei,10066, Taiwan
[3] Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University, 64, Sec. 2, ZhiNan Rd., Taipei,11605, Taiwan
来源
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science | 2022年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
Classification (of information) - Forestry - Image classification - Learning algorithms - Learning systems - Maximum likelihood - Optical radar - Remote sensing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, airborne hyperspectral imagery and LiDAR data were combined to establish spectral and 3-dimensional structural characteristics of land cover and forest types in the Liukuei Experimental Forest (LEF). Statistical and machine learning algorithms were used to develop automated classification models. In total, 19 variables were prepared as model candidate variables, which were divided into three major categories, including representative hyperspectral bands, vegetation indices calculated using hyperspectral data, and canopy structural indices derived from LiDAR data. Redundant variables were excluded by a correlation analysis, and the models were determined using 8 variables. Assessment of the importance of the variables showed that canopy height was an important structural feature for interpreting the land cover/forest types. Although more structural indices were included among the predictor variables selected by the specific tree-species classification model, they were less important than the vegetative indices. For the land cover/forest type classification, the difference between the overall accuracy of support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) model was 0.24%. Both models yielded an overall accuracy of 75% with similar levels of confusion between classification categories. For specific tree-species classification, the overall accuracy of RF was the highest (86.79%), followed by SVM (85%). The maximum likelihood classification (MLC) had relatively poor performance in both land cover/forest type classification and specific tree-species classification. These non-parametric machine learning models, which do not rely on data following particular statistical distribution, are more suitable for classification purposes when using data from different sensors or auxiliary variables. Their classification accuracy was more robust than traditional classification techniques such as MLC, especially when the feature space is complex. Overall, machine learning algorithms that integrate hyperspectral information and LiDAR-derived structural variables can effectively distinguish more-detailed forest cover types. © 2022 Taiwan Forestry Research Institute. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 143
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification of Forest Vegetation Using Airborne Hyperspectral Data
    V. D. Egorov
    V. V. Kozoderov
    [J]. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2021, 57 : 1538 - 1548
  • [42] Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR
    Antonarakis, A. S.
    Richards, K. S.
    Brasington, J.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (06) : 2988 - 2998
  • [43] Classification of hyperspectral and LiDAR data using coupled CNNs
    Hang, Renlong
    Li, Zhu
    Ghamisi, Pedram
    Hong, Danfeng
    Xia, Guiyu
    Liu, Qingshan
    [J]. Li, Zhu (lizhu@umkc.edu), 1600, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (58): : 4939 - 4950
  • [44] Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Using Coupled CNNs
    Hang, Renlong
    Li, Zhu
    Ghamisi, Pedram
    Hong, Danfeng
    Xia, Guiyu
    Liu, Qingshan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 58 (07): : 4939 - 4950
  • [45] Fusion of Multispectral LiDAR, Hyperspectral, and RGB Data for Urban Land Cover Classification
    Haensch, Ronny
    Hellwich, Olaf
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2021, 18 (02) : 366 - 370
  • [46] Urban Land Cover Classification With Airborne Hyperspectral Data: What Features to Use?
    Tong, Xiaohua
    Xie, Huan
    Weng, Qihao
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 7 (10) : 3998 - 4009
  • [47] FOREST SPECIES CLASSIFICATION BASED ON STATISTICAL POINT PATTERN ANALYSIS USING AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA
    Li, J.
    Hu, B.
    Noland, T. L.
    [J]. ISPRS WORKSHOP LASER SCANNING 2011, 2011, 38-5 (W12): : 271 - 276
  • [48] Data Augmentation in Prototypical Networks for Forest Tree Species Classification Using Airborne Hyperspectral Images
    Chen, Long
    Wei, Yuxin
    Yao, Zongqi
    Chen, Erxue
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
  • [49] Fusion of airborne LiDAR data and hyperspectral imagery for aboveground and belowground forest biomass estimation
    Luo, Shezhou
    Wang, Cheng
    Xi, Xiaohuan
    Pan, Feifei
    Peng, Dailiang
    Zou, Jie
    Nie, Sheng
    Qin, Haiming
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 73 : 378 - 387
  • [50] Integrated Airborne LiDAR Data and Imagery for Suburban Land Cover Classification Using Machine Learning Methods
    Mo, You
    Zhong, Ruofei
    Sun, Haili
    Wu, Qiong
    Du, Liming
    Geng, Yuxin
    Cao, Shisong
    [J]. SENSORS, 2019, 19 (09)