Defining Indicators for Performance Evaluation in Science and Technology Parks

被引:0
|
作者
Cardoso Da Silva D.J. [1 ]
Gibbon A.R.D.O. [2 ]
Teixeira C.S. [3 ]
Pique Huerta J.M. [4 ]
Da Veiga C.P. [5 ]
Dias Lopes L.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria
[2] Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande, Rio Grande
[3] University Federal de Santa Catarina, Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis
[4] La Salle - Ramon Llull University, Barcelona
[5] Fundação Dom Cabral, Nova Lima
来源
IEEE Engineering Management Review | 2023年 / 51卷 / 03期
关键词
Fuzzy Delphi; indicators; performance evaluation; science and technology parks;
D O I
10.1109/EMR.2023.3279933
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Performance evaluation is highly relevant, given the importance of science and technology parks for developing and disseminating knowledge and innovation. In this sense, this article sought to validate indicators for evaluating the performance of science and technology parks in the Brazilian context. To achieve the proposed objective, 213 indicators were selected, divided into ten assessment areas, and validated by 15 experts in the field. Our findings revealed that, from the total number of indicators selected, 136 were validated, drawing attention to the parks' relational area, which had the most indicators, both in the literature analyzed and in the validation process. Hence, this article provides theoretical and practical contributions that, through empirical data, can help evaluate performance and develop the management of science and technology parks since applying validated indicators can generate pertinent information, help articulate strategies, and promote innovation and entrepreneurship. © 1973-2011 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 92
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability performance in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most?
    Fores, Beatriz
    Fernandez-Yanez, Jose Maria
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [22] A Combined Evaluation Model for Competitiveness Assessment of Private Science and Technology Parks in China
    Li, Zhuoran
    Zhu, Yuming
    Weng, Xiaohai
    Han, Qingye
    Lyu, Fen
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM21), 2021, : 513 - 517
  • [23] EVOLUTION OF INDUSTRIAL COMPLEXES: FROM INDUSTRIAL PARKS TO SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS
    Shepelev, V. M.
    Larkin, A. A.
    Kosyakova, I. V.
    Gavrilova, M. A.
    Kulaeva, O. A.
    [J]. GCPMED 2018 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE GLOBAL CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS OF THE MODERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 57 : 1621 - 1628
  • [24] Technology Parks versus Science Parks: Does the university make the difference?
    Albahari, Alberto
    Perez-Canto, Salvador
    Barge-Gil, Andres
    Modrego, Aurelia
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 116 : 13 - 28
  • [25] Performance evaluation of the science and technology policy in Chongqing
    Du, Chunyan
    Xiao, Yacheng
    Lv, Weiyin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 5 (02) : 122 - 135
  • [26] Defining key windpower performance indicators
    Roberts, Dave
    [J]. POWER ENGINEERING, 2007, 111 (06) : 116 - 116
  • [27] Science and technology and their management indicators
    Herdoiza, Ivan
    [J]. UNIVERSITAS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y HUMANAS, 2005, (06): : 157 - 184
  • [28] Constraints to Open Innovation in Science and Technology Parks
    Simsek, Kubra
    Yildirim, Nihan
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, ISMC 2016, 2016, 235 : 719 - 728
  • [29] Mapping the conceptual structure of science and technology parks
    Eva-María Mora-Valentín
    Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado
    Juan-José Nájera-Sánchez
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2018, 43 : 1410 - 1435
  • [30] Science and technology parks and their relationships with university libraries
    Aportela-Rodriguez, Ivett M.
    Pacios, Ana R.
    [J]. INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2019, 24 (04):