Review of deep representation learning techniques for brain-computer interfaces

被引:1
|
作者
Guetschel, Pierre [1 ]
Ahmadi, Sara [1 ]
Tangermann, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
review; EEG; BCI; representation; embedding; deep learning; EEG SIGNAL CLASSIFICATION; TRANSFORMER; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/ad8962
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In the field of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), the potential for leveraging deep learning techniques for representing electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has gained substantial interest. Objective: This review synthesizes empirical findings from a collection of articles using deep representation learning techniques for BCI decoding, to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state-of-the-art. Approach: Each article was scrutinized based on three criteria: (1) the deep representation learning technique employed, (2) the underlying motivation for its utilization, and (3) the approaches adopted for characterizing the learned representations. Main results: Among the 81 articles finally reviewed in depth, our analysis reveals a predominance of 31 articles using autoencoders. We identified 13 studies employing self-supervised learning (SSL) techniques, among which ten were published in 2022 or later, attesting to the relative youth of the field. However, at the time being, none of these have led to standard foundation models that are picked up by the BCI community. Likewise, only a few studies have introspected their learned representations. We observed that the motivation in most studies for using representation learning techniques is for solving transfer learning tasks, but we also found more specific motivations such as to learn robustness or invariances, as an algorithmic bridge, or finally to uncover the structure of the data. Significance: Given the potential of foundation models to effectively tackle these challenges, we advocate for a continued dedication to the advancement of foundation models specifically designed for EEG signal decoding by using SSL techniques. We also underline the imperative of establishing specialized benchmarks and datasets to facilitate the development and continuous improvement of such foundation models.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optogenetic Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Tang, Feifang
    Yan, Feiyang
    Zhong, Yushan
    Li, Jinqian
    Gong, Hui
    Li, Xiangning
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2024, 11 (08):
  • [32] The business of brain-computer interfaces
    Smalley, Eric
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 37 (09) : 978 - 982
  • [33] The physiology of brain-computer interfaces
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    Birbaumer, Niels
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2007, 579 (03): : 570 - 570
  • [34] The Future of Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Abrams, Zara
    IEEE PULSE, 2022, 13 (06) : 21 - 24
  • [35] fMRI brain-computer interfaces
    Sitaram, Ranganatha
    Weiskopf, Nikolaus
    Caria, Andrea
    Veit, Ralf
    Erb, Michael
    Birbaumer, Niels
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2008, 25 (01) : 95 - 106
  • [36] Improving Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Kroeker, Kirk L.
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2011, 54 (10) : 11 - 14
  • [37] The year of brain-computer interfaces
    不详
    NATURE ELECTRONICS, 2023, 6 (09) : 643 - 643
  • [38] Emotional brain-computer interfaces
    Garcia-Molina, Gary
    Tsoneva, Tsvetomira
    Nijholt, Anton
    International Journal of Autonomous and Adaptive Communications Systems, 2013, 6 (01) : 9 - 25
  • [39] Terahertz brain-computer interfaces
    Nagarajan, Aarthy
    Singh, Ranjan
    NATURE REVIEWS BIOENGINEERING, 2025, 3 (03): : 185 - 186
  • [40] The physics of brain-computer interfaces
    Perkowitz, Sidney
    PHYSICS WORLD, 2023, 36 (12) : 29 - 32