Review of deep representation learning techniques for brain-computer interfaces

被引:1
|
作者
Guetschel, Pierre [1 ]
Ahmadi, Sara [1 ]
Tangermann, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
review; EEG; BCI; representation; embedding; deep learning; EEG SIGNAL CLASSIFICATION; TRANSFORMER; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/ad8962
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In the field of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), the potential for leveraging deep learning techniques for representing electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has gained substantial interest. Objective: This review synthesizes empirical findings from a collection of articles using deep representation learning techniques for BCI decoding, to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state-of-the-art. Approach: Each article was scrutinized based on three criteria: (1) the deep representation learning technique employed, (2) the underlying motivation for its utilization, and (3) the approaches adopted for characterizing the learned representations. Main results: Among the 81 articles finally reviewed in depth, our analysis reveals a predominance of 31 articles using autoencoders. We identified 13 studies employing self-supervised learning (SSL) techniques, among which ten were published in 2022 or later, attesting to the relative youth of the field. However, at the time being, none of these have led to standard foundation models that are picked up by the BCI community. Likewise, only a few studies have introspected their learned representations. We observed that the motivation in most studies for using representation learning techniques is for solving transfer learning tasks, but we also found more specific motivations such as to learn robustness or invariances, as an algorithmic bridge, or finally to uncover the structure of the data. Significance: Given the potential of foundation models to effectively tackle these challenges, we advocate for a continued dedication to the advancement of foundation models specifically designed for EEG signal decoding by using SSL techniques. We also underline the imperative of establishing specialized benchmarks and datasets to facilitate the development and continuous improvement of such foundation models.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of Covariate Shift Adaptation Techniques in Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Li, Yan
    Kambara, Hiroyuki
    Koike, Yasuharu
    Sugiyama, Masashi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 57 (06) : 1318 - 1324
  • [22] Materials for flexible and soft brain-computer interfaces, a review
    Remy, Antoine
    Lin, Xinyi
    Liu, Jia
    MRS COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 14 (05) : 827 - 834
  • [23] Intracortical brain-computer interfaces in primates: a review and outlook
    Alireza Rouzitalab
    Chadwick B. Boulay
    Jeongwon Park
    Adam J. Sachs
    Biomedical Engineering Letters, 2023, 13 : 375 - 390
  • [24] fNIRS-based brain-computer interfaces: a review
    Naseer, Noman
    Hong, Keum-Shik
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [25] Editorial: Deep Learning in Brain-Computer Interface
    Ahn, Minkyu
    Jun, Sung Chan
    Yeom, Hong Gi
    Cho, Hohyun
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [26] Brain-Computer Interfaces in Medicine
    Shih, Jerry J.
    Krusienski, Dean J.
    Wolpaw, Jonathan R.
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 87 (03) : 268 - 279
  • [27] Flexible brain-computer interfaces
    Tang, Xin
    Shen, Hao
    Zhao, Siyuan
    Li, Na
    Liu, Jia
    NATURE ELECTRONICS, 2023, 6 (02) : 109 - 118
  • [28] Multimodal Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Alexander Maye
    Andreas K.Engel
    Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2011, 16 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [29] Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs)
    Berger, Theodore W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2008, 167 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [30] An update for brain-computer interfaces
    不详
    NATURE ELECTRONICS, 2024, 7 (09): : 725 - 725