Laboratory Investigation on the Use of Geocomposites as Waterproofing Systems for Concrete Bridge Decks

被引:0
|
作者
Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, and Architecture, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona [1 ]
60131, Italy
机构
来源
J. Mater. Civ. Eng. | 2024年 / 2卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Water seepage in cement concrete structures is one of the main sources of degradation, especially for concrete bridge decks. Therefore, the protection of these strategic structures is a crucial task for civil engineers nowadays. In this context, this study focuses on the use of geocomposites as waterproofing systems for concrete bridge decks. Four geocomposites with different characteristics were compared based on a dedicated testing protocol. The influence of the concrete surface condition (dry or wet) as well as the type and dosage of the primer was also studied. Multilayered slabs, composed of cement concrete, primer, geocomposite, and asphalt concrete, were prepared in the laboratory. The proposed testing protocol includes four types of tests, i.e., shear bond tests (SBT) with the Leutner device, pull-off tests, binder bond strength (BBS) tests, and watertightness tests. Most configurations exhibited good shear resistance and adhesion properties. In general, the geocomposite type and the primer dosage had a significant influence on the behavior of the system, whereas the concrete condition and the primer type had no statistically significant effect. In most cases, the weak point of the system was the interface between cement concrete and primer or between primer and geocomposite. Finally, all geocomposites successfully passed the watertightness test. The proposed testing protocol can be useful for producers to design and optimize their products as well as for road agencies to prequalify the product in the laboratory on the basis of clear performance-based technical specifications. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Field Investigation of In-Service Performance of Concrete Bridge Decks in Pennsylvania
    Manafpour, Amir
    Hopper, Travis
    Rajabipour, Farshad
    Radlinska, Aleksandra
    Warn, Gordon P.
    Shokouhi, Parisa
    Morian, Dennis
    Jahangirnejad, Shervin
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2016, (2577) : 1 - 7
  • [22] Investigation of alternative technologies for cast-in-place concrete bridge decks
    Yost, Joseph Robert
    Dinehart, David W.
    Gross, Shawn P.
    Mignella, Michael
    Rapone, Christopher
    BRIDGE STRUCTURES, 2014, 10 (01) : 19 - 32
  • [23] Laboratory assessment of nine methods for nondestructive evaluation of concrete bridge decks with overlays
    Lin, Shibin
    Meng, Dewei
    Choi, Hajin
    Shams, Sadegh
    Azari, Hoda
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 188 : 966 - 982
  • [24] Use of Stay-in-Place Forms for Concrete Bridge Decks in Tennessee
    Knight, Marcus L.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2098) : 133 - 140
  • [25] REINFORCEMENT FOR CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS.
    Beal, David B.
    Research Report - New York State Department of Transportation, Engineering Research and Developmen, 1983,
  • [26] TORSIONAL RIGIDITY OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS
    JACKSON, N
    CONCRETE, 1968, 2 (11): : 468 - &
  • [27] Acoustic inspection of concrete bridge decks
    Henderson, ME
    Dion, GN
    Costley, RD
    NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF BRIDGES AND HIGHWAYS III, 1999, 3587 : 219 - 227
  • [28] TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION IN CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS
    HARRIS, AJ
    SMITH, BW
    HO, D
    LIU, CH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 1993, 99 (02) : 233 - 235
  • [29] DETERIORATION RATES OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS
    CADY, PD
    WEYERS, RE
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1984, 110 (01): : 34 - 44
  • [30] STRENGTH OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS.
    Beal, David B.
    Research Report - New York State Department of Transportation, Engineering Research and Development Bureau, 1981,