Use of Stay-in-Place Forms for Concrete Bridge Decks in Tennessee

被引:0
|
作者
Knight, Marcus L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Concrete Ind Management Program, Murfreesboro, TN 37132 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2098-14
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Bridge decks, concrete or otherwise, represent one of the most heavily deteriorated components of typical highway bridges. Bridge construction continues to proceed at high volume, and in the past, bridge repair, rehabilitation, and replacement increased as well. Enormous amounts of funding are required to support initial construction and repairs as needed. This national trend is also evident within the Tennessee bridge inventory, which currently numbers approximately 20,000, with a majority of the structures utilizing concrete cast-in-place decks. Because of the increasing volume of work and limited funding, efficient methods of constructing and repairing concrete bridge decks have been of interest during the past decades. Durable, high-quality bridge decks have been constructed in Tennessee with three primary forming systems: temporary forms and falsework anti stay-in-place form systems consisting of precast concrete panels and permanent steel forms. Each of these form systems is discussed, with a description of typical applications and estimation of the frequency of use. Currently, cast-in-place decks in Tennessee represent approximately 60% of the inventory and are predominantly (90%) cast by using permanent steel forms. The effects of stay-in-place forms on finished cast-in-place decks were investigated as well as form durability and inspection and repair considerations. This information was obtained through review of Tennessee Department of Transportation specifications and standard drawings and interviews of department personnel.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 140
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Splices of FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms in Concrete Bridge Decks
    Nelson, Mark
    Beriker, Emir
    Fam, Amir
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 18 (04)
  • [2] Effect of stay-in-place metal forms on performance of concrete bridge decks
    Guthrie, W. Spencer
    Frost, Stephen L.
    Birdsall, Aimee W.
    Linford, Ellen T.
    Ross, Laren A.
    Crane, Rebecca A.
    Eggett, Dennis L.
    MANAGING AND MAINTAINING HIGHWAY STRUCTURES AND PAVEMENTS, 2006, (1958): : 33 - 41
  • [3] Design Equations for Concrete Bridge Decks with FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms
    Noel, Martin
    Fam, Amir
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2016, 20 (05)
  • [4] Fatigue Behavior of Concrete Bridge Decks Cast on GFRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms
    Richardson, Patrick
    Nelson, Mark
    Fam, Amir
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 18 (03)
  • [5] Postfire Performance of GFRP Stay-in-Place Formwork for Concrete Bridge Decks
    Nicoletta, Benjamin
    Woods, Joshua
    Gales, John
    Fam, Amir
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 23 (03)
  • [6] Concrete bridge decks constructed with fiber-reinforced polymer stay-in-place forms and grid reinforcing
    Dieter, DA
    Dietsche, JS
    Bank, LC
    Oliva, MG
    Russell, JS
    DESIGN OF STRUCTURES 2002: BRIDGES, OTHER STRUCTURES, AND HYDRAULICS AND HYDROLOGY, 2002, (1814): : 219 - 226
  • [7] Concrete bridge decks constructed with fiber-reinforced polymer stay-in-place forms and grid reinforcing
    Dept. of Civil and Environ. Eng., University of Wisconsin-Madison, Room 2225 Eng. Hall, 1415 Eng. Drive, Madison, WI 53706, United States
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Transp Res Rec, 1814 (219-226):
  • [8] Influence of stay-in-place forms on concrete bridge deck corrosion
    Balakumaran, Soundar S. G., 1600, American Concrete Institute (111):
  • [9] Concrete bridge deck stresses induced by stay-in-place forms
    Riad, Mourad Y.
    William, Gergis W.
    Shoukry, Samir N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 167 (02) : 111 - 121
  • [10] Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Stay-in-Place Structural Forms for Concrete Bridge Decks: State-of-the-Art Review
    Nelson, M. S.
    Fam, A. Z.
    Busel, J. P.
    Bakis, C. E.
    Nanni, A.
    Bank, L. C.
    Henderson, M.
    Hanus, J.
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2014, 111 (05) : 1069 - 1079