Comparison of machine learning approach to other commonly used unfolding methods

被引:0
|
作者
Baron P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Joint Laboratory of Optics of Palacký University, Institute of Physics AS CR, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 12, Olomouc
来源
Acta Phys Pol B | / 8卷 / 863-869期
关键词
Machine learning;
D O I
10.5506/APHYSPOLB.52.863
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Unfolding in high energy physics represents the correction of measured spectra in data for the finite detector efficiency, acceptance, and resolution from the detector to particle level. Recent machine learning approaches provide unfolding on an event-by-event basis allowing to simultaneously unfold a large number of variables and thus to cover a wider region of the features that affect detector response. This study focuses on a simple comparison of commonly used methods in RooUnfold package to the machine learning package OmniFold. © 2021 Jagellonian University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 869
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A COMPARISON OF 5 OF THE METHODS COMMONLY USED TO MEASURE PROTEIN CONCENTRATIONS IN FISH SERA
    ALEXANDER, JB
    INGRAM, GA
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 1980, 16 (02) : 115 - 122
  • [42] A REVIEW AND COMPARISON OF SOME COMMONLY USED METHODS OF ESTIMATING PETROLEUM RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
    HERBERT, JH
    ENERGY SOURCES, 1982, 6 (04): : 293 - 320
  • [43] A review of machine learning methods used for educational data
    Ersozlu, Zara
    Taheri, Sona
    Koch, Inge
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (16) : 22125 - 22145
  • [44] A Review of Methods Used in Machine Learning and Data Analysis
    Wu, Qingyang
    ICMLC 2019: 2019 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND COMPUTING, 2019, : 37 - 45
  • [45] Comparison of commonly used spinal needles
    Sharma, S
    Philip, J
    Lacour, T
    Perez, B
    Slaymaker, E
    Weidner, C
    Wiley, J
    Yamanouchi, K
    Sidawi, J
    Wallace, D
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (02): : U171 - U171
  • [46] Neural Network based Prediction of Protein Structure and Function: Comparison with Other Machine Learning Methods
    Gromiha, M. Michael
    Ahmad, Shandar
    Suwa, Makiko
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 1739 - +
  • [47] Comparison of machine learning methods for crack localization
    Hein, Helle
    Jaanuska, Ljubov
    ACTA ET COMMENTATIONES UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS DE MATHEMATICA, 2019, 23 (01): : 125 - 142
  • [48] Nutrient diffusing substrata: a field comparison of commonly used methods to assess nutrient limitation
    Capps, Krista A.
    Booth, Michael T.
    Collins, Sarah M.
    Davison, Marita A.
    Moslemi, Jennifer M.
    El-Sabaawi, Rana W.
    Simonis, Joseph L.
    Flecker, Alexander S.
    JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 30 (02): : 522 - 532
  • [49] Comparison of certain microbial counting methods which are currently commonly used in the soaking process
    Bayramoglu, Eser Eke
    Yamamoto, Gonca Telli
    Uluc, Dueden
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 8 (24): : 6938 - 6944
  • [50] Comparing Performances of Multiple Comparison Methods in Commonly Used 2 × C Contingency Tables
    Sengul Cangur
    Handan Ankarali
    Ozge Pasin
    Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, 2016, 8 : 337 - 345