Comparison of certain microbial counting methods which are currently commonly used in the soaking process

被引:0
|
作者
Bayramoglu, Eser Eke [2 ]
Yamamoto, Gonca Telli [1 ]
Uluc, Dueden [2 ]
机构
[1] Okan Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Dept Informat Syst, TR-34959 Tuzla Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Leather Engn, TR-35100 Bornova, Turkey
来源
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY | 2009年 / 8卷 / 24期
关键词
Leather industry; soaking process; bacteria number; bactericide; LEATHER INDUSTRY; ESSENTIAL OIL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This study examines the interrelation of the test methods which are commonly applied in the leather industry for hide or skin soaking. For this purpose, five different bactericides were given during the soaking processes and after the presoaking process. The processes were measured at the first 20(th) min, 24(th) and 48(th) h. For this purpose, two different ATP test kits, dip slide and agar pour plate method were used in order to determine the microorganism load as RLU (Relative Light Units) or CFU (Colony Forming Units)/ml. The values with all methods were identified as highly different from each other, while the statistical analyses indicated positive Pearson correlation coefficients especially between the 24(th) and 48(th) h measurements. The appearance of a positive correlation between the different methods under constant conditions implied the effectiveness of the bactericides to the customer at the factory environment. The ATP test method and dip slide methods that are commonly used in the market are correct and convenient methods offered by some companies.
引用
收藏
页码:6938 / 6944
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of methods currently used in inclusive design
    Goodman-Deane, Joy
    Ward, James
    Hosking, Ian
    Clarkson, P. John
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2014, 45 (04) : 886 - 894
  • [2] EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF SOME COMMONLY USED GAME-COUNTING METHODS
    BOTHMA, JD
    PEEL, MJS
    PETTIT, S
    GROSSMAN, D
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 1990, 20 (01): : 26 - 32
  • [3] Comparison of statistical methods commonly used in predictive modelling
    Muñoz, J
    Felicísimo, AM
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) : 285 - 292
  • [4] A comparison of two commonly used methods of weight estimation
    Argall, JAW
    Wright, N
    Mackway-Jones, K
    Jackson, R
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2003, 88 (09) : 789 - 790
  • [5] PLOIDY DETERMINATION - A COMPARISON OF 4 COMMONLY USED METHODS
    PULLMAN, J
    WILBURN, S
    BUR, M
    REALE, F
    WODA, B
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1990, 62 (01) : A81 - A81
  • [7] A COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF COMMONLY USED METHODS OF MEASURING IDENTIFICATION PROCESS
    MCALLISTER, LW
    NEURINGER, C
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 80 (02): : 229 - +
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF THREE COMMONLY USED METHODS FOR TREATING NO PREFERENCE VOTES
    Ennis, John M.
    Ennis, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2012, 27 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [9] Comparison of commonly used extraction methods for ergosterol in soil samples
    Sae-Tun, Orracha
    Maftukhah, Rizki
    Noller, Christoph
    Remlinger, Vivian I.
    Meyer-Laker, Victoria
    Sorensen, Anders C. T.
    Sustic, Dunja
    Socianu, Sebastian I.
    Bernardini, Luca G.
    Mentler, Axel
    Keiblinger, Katharina M.
    INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2020, 34 (04) : 425 - 432
  • [10] Comparison of two commonly used methods for stimulating T cells
    Juanjuan Jiao
    Xincheng Zhao
    Ruixia Hou
    Ying Wang
    Wenjuan Chang
    Nannan Liang
    Yanmin Liu
    Jianxiao Xing
    Yue Cao
    Xiaofang Li
    Kaiming Zhang
    Biotechnology Letters, 2019, 41 : 1361 - 1371