Assessment of organ and effective dose when using region-of-interest attenuators in cone-beam CT and interventional fluoroscopy

被引:8
|
作者
Xiong Z. [1 ,2 ]
Vijayan S. [1 ,2 ]
Rudin S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bednarek D.R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] University at Buffalo, Medical Physics Program, Buffalo, NY
[2] University at Buffalo, Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Center, Buffalo, NY
[3] University at Buffalo, Department of Radiology, Buffalo, NY
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cone-beam CT; dose reduction; EGSnrc; interventional fluoroscopy procedure; Monte Carlo; region-of-interest imaging;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031210
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In some medical-imaging procedures using cone-beam CT (CBCT) and fluoroscopy, only the center of the field of view (FOV) may be needed to be visualized with optimal image quality. To reduce the dose to the patient while maintaining visualization of the entire FOV, a Cu attenuator with a circular aperture for the region of interest (ROI) is used. The potential organ and effective dose reductions of ROI imaging when applied to CBCT and interventional fluoroscopic procedures were determined using EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. The Monte Carlo model was first validated by comparing the surface dose distribution in a solid-water block phantom with measurement by Gafchromic film. The dependence of dose reduction on the ROI attenuator thickness, the opening size of the ROI, the axial beam position, and the location of the different organs for both neuro and thoracic imaging was evaluated. The results showed a reduction in most organ doses of 45% to 70% and in effective dose of 46% to 66% compared to the dose in a CBCT scan and in an interventional procedure without the ROI attenuator. This work provides evidence of a substantial reduction of organ and effective doses when using an ROI attenuator during CBCT and fluoroscopic procedures. © 2017 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correction of megavoltage cone-beam CT images for dose calculation in the head and neck region
    Aubrya, Jean-Francois
    Pouliot, Jean
    Beaulieu, Luc
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (03) : 900 - 907
  • [42] Effective Dose during Needle Interventions: Cone-beam CT Guidance Compared with Conventional CT Guidance
    Braak, Sicco J.
    van Strijen, Marco J. L.
    van Es, Hendrik W.
    Nievelstein, Rutger A. J.
    van Heesewijk, Johannes P. M.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (04) : 455 - 461
  • [43] Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT
    Jeong, Dae-Kyo
    Lee, Sang-Chul
    Huh, Kyung-Hoe
    Yi, Won-Jin
    Heo, Min-Suk
    Lee, Sam-Sun
    Choi, Soon-Chul
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2012, 42 (02) : 65 - 70
  • [44] Biplane interventional pediatric system with cone-beam CT: dose and image quality characterization for the default protocols
    Corredoira, Eva
    Vano, Eliseo
    Alejo, Luis
    Ubeda, Carlos
    Gutierrez-Larraya, Federico
    Garayoa, Julia
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (04): : 357 - 376
  • [45] Assessment of abdominal organ dose and image quality in varying arc trajectory interventional C-arm cone beam CT
    Papadakis, Antonios E.
    Damilakis, John
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 102 : 46 - 54
  • [46] Dose calculation in presence of a metallic object using megavoltage cone-beam CT
    Aubin, M.
    Morin, O.
    Aubry, J.
    Chen, J.
    Descovich, M.
    Pouliot, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2222 - 2222
  • [47] Comparison of Correction Methods for Dose Computation Using Cone-Beam CT Images
    Lazos, D.
    Furhang, E.
    Kim, C.
    Hu, K.
    Ennis, R.
    Harrison, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [48] Volume-of-interest cone-beam CT using a 2.35 MV beam generated with a carbon target
    Robar, James L.
    Parsons, David
    Berman, Avery
    MacDonald, Alex
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4209 - 4218
  • [49] Ultra-low-dose cone-beam CT compared to standard dose in the assessment for acute fractures
    Murphy, M. C.
    Gibney, B.
    Walsh, J.
    Orpen, G.
    Kenny, E.
    Bolster, F.
    MacMahon, P. J.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (01) : 153 - 159
  • [50] Ultra-low-dose cone-beam CT compared to standard dose in the assessment for acute fractures
    M. C. Murphy
    B. Gibney
    J. Walsh
    G. Orpen
    E. Kenny
    F. Bolster
    P. J. MacMahon
    Skeletal Radiology, 2022, 51 : 153 - 159