Two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making for wind-photovoltaic-hydropower scheduling

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Weifeng [1 ]
Guo, Xuning [1 ]
Xing, Xigang [1 ]
Jiang, Chenhui [1 ]
Li, Jieyu [2 ]
Lu, Qingwen [3 ]
Li, Yunling [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Planning & D, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[2] YRCC, Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Municipal Water Bur, Shanghai 201699, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Stochastic multi-criteria decision making; SMAA; Uncertainty; Wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems; OPERATION; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL; MCDM;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems is a complex multi-objective collaborative problem which requires multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to assist in formulating the most-preferred scheduling scheme. There are uncertainties existing in criteria weights (CWs) due to the limitations of the knowledge level of decision makers and the subjectivity of preferences. This paper proposes a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making model considering the uncertainties in the decision making environment and the progression of the decision making process. For the prophase decision making (the first stage), the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) theory and the MCDM model VIKOR are combined to construct a SMAA-VIKOR model for inverse weight space analysis on the situation that the initial CW information is completely unknown. In the second stage of decision making, the decision makers are allowed to express their fuzzy preferences based on the information provided in the first stage by coupling the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) into the SMAA-VIKOR model to obtain the final scheme. The wind-photovoltaic-hydropower system in Yalong River Basin is selected as the case study. Results show that among the 12 alternative schemes, scheme A2 is ranked first with the probability of 0.69 in the first stage while the probability of taking the first ranking in the second stage is increased to 1. More explicit ranking results are obtained based on the results of the first stage, which effectively enhances the confidence of decision makers and improves decision making efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:3732 / 3742
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria genetic optimisation of the manoeuvres of a two-stage launcher
    Alonso Zotes, Fernando
    Santos Penas, Matilde
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2010, 180 (06) : 896 - 910
  • [22] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Erkan Celik
    Muhammet Gul
    Melih Yucesan
    Suleyman Mete
    Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8
  • [23] Multi-criteria decision making for 1.5 MW wind turbine selection
    Sagbansua, Lutfu
    Balo, Figen
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 111 : 413 - 419
  • [24] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Hybrid Operation of Wind Farms
    Dhiman, Harsh S.
    Deb, Dipankar
    Muresan, Vlad
    Unguresan, Mihaela-Ligia
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (05):
  • [25] A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making approach of making emergency decisions
    Liu Mao
    Zhang Yunlong
    3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MODERN MINING & SAFETY TECHNOLOGY PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 387 - 391
  • [26] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [27] Algorithm for Neutrosophic Soft Sets in Stochastic Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Based on Prospect Theory
    Dong, Yuanxiang
    Hou, Chenjing
    Pan, Yuchen
    Gong, Ke
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (09):
  • [28] Multi-objective workflow scheduling scheme: a multi-criteria decision making approach
    Madhu Sudan Kumar
    Abhinav Tomar
    Prasanta K. Jana
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2021, 12 : 10789 - 10808
  • [29] Multi-objective workflow scheduling scheme: a multi-criteria decision making approach
    Kumar, Madhu Sudan
    Tomar, Abhinav
    Jana, Prasanta K.
    JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 12 (12) : 10789 - 10808
  • [30] A two-stage stochastic preference analysis on group decision making with interval additive preference relations
    Li, Jiabei
    Zhou, Ligang
    Martinez, Luis
    Deveci, Muhammet
    Wu, Qun
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 254