Two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making for wind-photovoltaic-hydropower scheduling

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Weifeng [1 ]
Guo, Xuning [1 ]
Xing, Xigang [1 ]
Jiang, Chenhui [1 ]
Li, Jieyu [2 ]
Lu, Qingwen [3 ]
Li, Yunling [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Planning & D, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[2] YRCC, Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Municipal Water Bur, Shanghai 201699, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Stochastic multi-criteria decision making; SMAA; Uncertainty; Wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems; OPERATION; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL; MCDM;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems is a complex multi-objective collaborative problem which requires multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to assist in formulating the most-preferred scheduling scheme. There are uncertainties existing in criteria weights (CWs) due to the limitations of the knowledge level of decision makers and the subjectivity of preferences. This paper proposes a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making model considering the uncertainties in the decision making environment and the progression of the decision making process. For the prophase decision making (the first stage), the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) theory and the MCDM model VIKOR are combined to construct a SMAA-VIKOR model for inverse weight space analysis on the situation that the initial CW information is completely unknown. In the second stage of decision making, the decision makers are allowed to express their fuzzy preferences based on the information provided in the first stage by coupling the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) into the SMAA-VIKOR model to obtain the final scheme. The wind-photovoltaic-hydropower system in Yalong River Basin is selected as the case study. Results show that among the 12 alternative schemes, scheme A2 is ranked first with the probability of 0.69 in the first stage while the probability of taking the first ranking in the second stage is increased to 1. More explicit ranking results are obtained based on the results of the first stage, which effectively enhances the confidence of decision makers and improves decision making efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:3732 / 3742
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Private and Shared Criteria: An Experiment
    Zarate, Pascale
    Camilleri, Guy
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION: THEORY, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, AND APPLICATION, GDN 2016, 2017, 274 : 31 - 42
  • [12] Two-stage interactive method for group multiple criteria decision making under risk
    Du, Y. (duyuanwei@gmail.com), 2012, Advanced Institute of Convergence Information Technology (04):
  • [13] Multi-criteria group decision making based on bilateral agreements
    Xia, Meimei
    Chen, Jian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 240 (03) : 756 - 764
  • [14] Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Various Ordinal Assessments
    Chang, Wenjun
    Fu, Chao
    Feng, Nanping
    Yang, Shanlin
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2021, 30 (06) : 1285 - 1314
  • [15] Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Various Ordinal Assessments
    Wenjun Chang
    Chao Fu
    Nanping Feng
    Shanlin Yang
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2021, 30 : 1285 - 1314
  • [16] Group Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making in Supplier Evaluation
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    Chen, Lisa Y.
    Chen, Yueh-Hsiang
    2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-15, 2007, : 5761 - +
  • [17] A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR THE UNRELATED PARALLEL MACHINES SCHEDULING PROBLEM
    Chang, Weishung
    Chyu, Chiuhcheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 258 - 265
  • [18] Two-stage stochastic scheduling model of wind-photovoltaic-storage providing flexible ramp capacity
    Huang, Ruanming
    He, Xinqin
    Zhao, Jingjing
    Fei, Fei
    Guo, Mingxing
    FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2020, 467
  • [19] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Celik, Erkan
    Gul, Muhammet
    Yucesan, Melih
    Mete, Suleyman
    BENI-SUEF UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [20] A heterogeneous QUALIFLEX method with criteria interaction for multi-criteria group decision making
    Liang, Yingying
    Qin, Jindong
    Martinez, Luis
    Liu, Jun
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 512 : 1481 - 1502