Two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making for wind-photovoltaic-hydropower scheduling

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Weifeng [1 ]
Guo, Xuning [1 ]
Xing, Xigang [1 ]
Jiang, Chenhui [1 ]
Li, Jieyu [2 ]
Lu, Qingwen [3 ]
Li, Yunling [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Planning & D, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[2] YRCC, Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Municipal Water Bur, Shanghai 201699, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Stochastic multi-criteria decision making; SMAA; Uncertainty; Wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems; OPERATION; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL; MCDM;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems is a complex multi-objective collaborative problem which requires multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to assist in formulating the most-preferred scheduling scheme. There are uncertainties existing in criteria weights (CWs) due to the limitations of the knowledge level of decision makers and the subjectivity of preferences. This paper proposes a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making model considering the uncertainties in the decision making environment and the progression of the decision making process. For the prophase decision making (the first stage), the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) theory and the MCDM model VIKOR are combined to construct a SMAA-VIKOR model for inverse weight space analysis on the situation that the initial CW information is completely unknown. In the second stage of decision making, the decision makers are allowed to express their fuzzy preferences based on the information provided in the first stage by coupling the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) into the SMAA-VIKOR model to obtain the final scheme. The wind-photovoltaic-hydropower system in Yalong River Basin is selected as the case study. Results show that among the 12 alternative schemes, scheme A2 is ranked first with the probability of 0.69 in the first stage while the probability of taking the first ranking in the second stage is increased to 1. More explicit ranking results are obtained based on the results of the first stage, which effectively enhances the confidence of decision makers and improves decision making efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:3732 / 3742
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making for scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems
    Liu, Weifeng
    Zhang, Yu
    Xing, Xigang
    Guo, Xuning
    Ma, Rui
    Li, Jieyu
    Li, Yunling
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 15 (04) : 1653 - 1666
  • [2] Sustainability assessment and decision making of hydrogen production technologies: A novel two-stage multi-criteria decision making method
    Ren, Xusheng
    Li, Weichen
    Ding, Shimin
    Dong, Lichun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (59) : 34371 - 34384
  • [3] Multi-objective optimization scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems considering riverine ecosystem
    Liu, Weifeng
    Zhu, Feilin
    Chen, Juan
    Wang, Hao
    Xu, Bin
    Song, Peibing
    Zhong, Ping-an
    Lei, Xiaohui
    Wang, Chao
    Yan, Mengjia
    Li, Jieyu
    Yang, Minzhi
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 196 : 32 - 43
  • [4] Optimal site selection study of wind-photovoltaic-shared energy storage power stations based on GIS and multi-criteria decision making: A two-stage framework
    Gao, Jianwei
    Wang, Yaping
    Huang, Ningbo
    Wei, Lingli
    Zhang, Zixuan
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 201 : 1139 - 1162
  • [5] Optimal site selection study of wind-photovoltaic-shared energy storage power stations based on GIS and multi-criteria decision making: A two-stage framework
    Gao, Jianwei
    Wang, Yaping
    Huang, Ningbo
    Wei, Lingli
    Zhang, Zixuan
    Renewable Energy, 2022, 201 : 1139 - 1162
  • [6] Two-Stage Stochastic Scheduling of Cascaded Hydropower-Wind-Photovoltaic Hybrid Systems Considering Contract Decomposition and Spot Market
    Li, Yang
    Fang, Ni
    He, Shengming
    Wu, Feng
    Li, Outing
    Shi, Linjun
    Ding, Renshan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [7] Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process
    Socorro Garcia-Cascales, M.
    Teresa Lamata, M.
    Miguel Sanchez-Lozano, J.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 199 (01) : 373 - 391
  • [8] Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process
    M. Socorro García-Cascales
    M. Teresa Lamata
    J. Miguel Sánchez-Lozano
    Annals of Operations Research, 2012, 199 : 373 - 391
  • [9] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Scheduling
    Saroja, S.
    Revathi, T.
    Auluck, Nitin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2018, 17 (05) : 1399 - 1427
  • [10] Multi-criteria decision making on strategic selection of wind farms
    Lee, Amy H. I.
    Chen, Hsing Hung
    Kang, He-Yau
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2009, 34 (01) : 120 - 126