Effect of regenerated standpipe flow pattern on catalyst transport in fluid catalytic cracking unit

被引:0
|
作者
Peng, Wei [1 ]
Huang, Xinjun [1 ]
Zhang, Huadong [2 ]
Han, Shengxian [2 ]
He, Jiao [1 ]
Gao, Zhuwei [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr Beijing Karamay, Karamay 834000, Peoples R China
[2] Karamay Petrochem Co, CNPC, Karamay 834003, Peoples R China
[3] Hainan Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
基金
海南省自然科学基金;
关键词
Fluid catalytic cracking; Regeneration standpipe; Dynamic pressure; Flow pattern; Aeration gas; GAS; SOLIDS; BED; FLUIDIZATION; DYNAMICS; FRICTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.133146
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Standpipe is a pipeline that constitutes one of the components in the downstream portion of the catalyst circulation loop in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit, facilitates catalyst transportation between reactor and regenerator. This study measured pressures of the regenerated standpipe on a 1.0 Mt/a FCC unit to elucidate the underlying cause of the observed catalyst transportation. The results indicated that multiple flow patterns coexist within the standpipe, rather than a single dense-phase flow. The characteristic parameters of the static and dynamic pressure were intimately connected to the aforementioned flow patterns. The dynamic pressure data indicated that pressure dominant frequency and amplitude could employed in the identification of flow patterns. The packed bed flow had a pressure frequency ranging from 0 to 3.3 Hz, and a dominant frequency amplitude of 0.8, 1.8 and 2.2 Hz, allowed diagnosis of poor catalyst transport. The study demonstrated that the standpipe structure and catalyst mass flow rate were the key factors affecting gas-solid flow degassing by allowing for multiple flow patterns in the standpipe. The influence of aeration on the flow patterns was also discussed here, with an improper aeration rate resulting in reaction temperature fluctuations ranging from 0.5 to 23 degrees C.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SMALL SCALE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT
    RICE, T
    CARPENTER, JK
    ACKERMAN, CD
    INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1954, 46 (08): : 1558 - 1561
  • [22] Dynamic model of fluid catalytic cracking unit
    Luo, Xionglin
    Yuan, Pu
    Lin, Shixiong
    Shiyou Xuebao, Shiyou Jiagong/Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 14 (01): : 34 - 40
  • [23] Modeling and simulation of fluid catalytic cracking unit
    Gupta, R
    Kumar, V
    Srivastava, VK
    REVIEWS IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 21 (02) : 95 - 131
  • [24] Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit Emissions and Their Impact
    Wael H. Yateem
    Vahid Nassehi
    Abdul Rehman Khan
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2011, 218 : 37 - 47
  • [25] Additional feedstock for fluid catalytic cracking unit
    Venugopal, R.
    Selvavathy, V.
    Lavanya, M.
    Balu, K.
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 26 (04) : 436 - 445
  • [26] THE EFFECT OF PARTICLE PROPERTIES ON THE BEHAVIOR OF EQUILIBRIUM CRACKING CATALYSTS IN STANDPIPE FLOW
    GELDART, D
    RADTKE, AL
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 47 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [27] Catalyst used in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit as a support of NiMoP catalyst for light cycle oil hydroprocessing
    Palos, Roberto
    Gutierrez, Alazne
    Arandes, Jose M.
    Bilbao, Javier
    FUEL, 2018, 216 : 142 - 152
  • [28] STRATEGIES FOR CATALYTIC OCTANE ENHANCEMENT IN A FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT
    EDWARDS, GC
    RAJAGOPALAN, K
    PETERS, AW
    YOUNG, GW
    CREIGHTON, JE
    ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES, 1988, 375 : 101 - 113
  • [29] Catalytic cracking of glycerol to fine chemicals over equilibrium fluid catalytic cracking catalyst
    Naik, Desavath V.
    Singh, K. K.
    Kumar, Vimal
    Prasad, Basheshar
    Behera, B.
    Bangwal, D. P.
    Atheya, Neeraj
    Garg, M. O.
    4 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY RESEARCH (ICAER 2013), 2014, 54 : 593 - 598
  • [30] CATALYST REPLACEMENT DURING THE WORKING OF A CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT
    ZHITOMIRSKII, BM
    LIBERZON, IM
    SOSKIN, EM
    MARKHEVKA, VI
    CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY OF FUELS AND OILS, 1989, 25 (5-6) : 298 - 300