Effect of regenerated standpipe flow pattern on catalyst transport in fluid catalytic cracking unit

被引:0
|
作者
Peng, Wei [1 ]
Huang, Xinjun [1 ]
Zhang, Huadong [2 ]
Han, Shengxian [2 ]
He, Jiao [1 ]
Gao, Zhuwei [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr Beijing Karamay, Karamay 834000, Peoples R China
[2] Karamay Petrochem Co, CNPC, Karamay 834003, Peoples R China
[3] Hainan Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
基金
海南省自然科学基金;
关键词
Fluid catalytic cracking; Regeneration standpipe; Dynamic pressure; Flow pattern; Aeration gas; GAS; SOLIDS; BED; FLUIDIZATION; DYNAMICS; FRICTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.133146
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Standpipe is a pipeline that constitutes one of the components in the downstream portion of the catalyst circulation loop in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit, facilitates catalyst transportation between reactor and regenerator. This study measured pressures of the regenerated standpipe on a 1.0 Mt/a FCC unit to elucidate the underlying cause of the observed catalyst transportation. The results indicated that multiple flow patterns coexist within the standpipe, rather than a single dense-phase flow. The characteristic parameters of the static and dynamic pressure were intimately connected to the aforementioned flow patterns. The dynamic pressure data indicated that pressure dominant frequency and amplitude could employed in the identification of flow patterns. The packed bed flow had a pressure frequency ranging from 0 to 3.3 Hz, and a dominant frequency amplitude of 0.8, 1.8 and 2.2 Hz, allowed diagnosis of poor catalyst transport. The study demonstrated that the standpipe structure and catalyst mass flow rate were the key factors affecting gas-solid flow degassing by allowing for multiple flow patterns in the standpipe. The influence of aeration on the flow patterns was also discussed here, with an improper aeration rate resulting in reaction temperature fluctuations ranging from 0.5 to 23 degrees C.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING - SOME RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CATALYST PARTICLE DESIGN AND UNIT HARDWARE
    MANN, R
    CATALYSIS TODAY, 1993, 18 (04) : 509 - 528
  • [12] Mechanisms and fault tree analysis of catalyst loss in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit
    Wang, Di
    Sun, Liqiang
    Yan, Chaoyu
    Wei, Yaodong
    Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38 (08): : 3534 - 3539
  • [13] Fluid catalytic cracking: process, catalyst and chemistry
    Guisnet, M
    Mignard, S
    ACTUALITE CHIMIQUE, 2000, (02): : 14 - 22
  • [14] A review of catalyst deactivation in fluid catalytic cracking
    OConnor, P
    Brevoord, E
    Wijingaards, HN
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 211 : 72 - PETR
  • [15] Sodium deactivation of fluid catalytic cracking catalyst
    Zhao, XJ
    Cheng, WC
    DEACTIVATION AND TESTING OF HYDROCARBON-PROCESSING CATALYSTS, 1996, 634 : 159 - 170
  • [16] Sodium Deactivation of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Catalyst
    Zhao, X.
    Cheng, W.-C.
    ACS Symposium Series, 1996, (634):
  • [17] Fluid catalyst process - Catalytic cracking of pertroleum
    Murphree, EV
    Brown, CL
    Fischer, HGM
    Gohr, EJ
    Sweeney, WJ
    INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1943, 35 : 768 - 773
  • [18] Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit Emissions and Their Impact
    Yateem, Wael H.
    Nassehi, Vahid
    Khan, Abdul Rehman
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2011, 218 (1-4): : 37 - 47
  • [19] Coordinated control of a fluid catalytic cracking unit
    Kiss, P
    Szeifert, F
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 21 (06) : 515 - 521
  • [20] FLUID-BED CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT
    MARSHALL, JA
    ASKINS, JW
    INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1953, 45 (07): : 1603 - 1608