Tower Companies vs. Mergers in Mobile Networks

被引:0
|
作者
Koutroumpis, Pantelis [1 ]
Masselos, Konstantinos [2 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Martin Sch, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Peloponnese, Tripoli, Greece
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Costs; Corporate acquisitions; Reviews; Poles and towers; Europe; Companies; Telecommunications; History; Standards; Faces;
D O I
10.1109/MCOM.001.2400108
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Tower companies own almost three quarters of the mobile telecom installations globally and continue to grow. The main driver of this change is linked to the reduction of capital expenditures by operators and the increasing sharing of infrastructure by tower companies that improves their assets' tenancy ratios. In this article we review the history of tower company introductions in European markets, and compare the operator financial outcomes, along with the cost of services and market concentration that consumers experience. We also compare the wave of mergers during the same period in Europe, as an alternative cost-saving approach. We find that mergers primarily help operators improve their financial positions and EBITDA margin by 8.6 percentage points while consumers face significantly more concentrated markets with fewer options. Tower companies reduce average revenues per user by 1.41-1.79 Euros as increased tenancy ratios are passed-through to consumers, helping operators reduce their capital expenditures. We provide policy and market recommendations based on these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 74
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: Mobile IPv6 vs. Proxy Mobile IPv6
    Kong, Ki-Sik
    Lee, Wonjun
    Han, Youn-Hee
    Shin, Myung-Ki
    You, HeungRyeol
    IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 15 (02) : 36 - 45
  • [32] Static vs. mobile sink: The influence of basic parameters on energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks
    Khan, Majid I.
    Gansterer, Wilfried N.
    Haring, Guenter
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 36 (09) : 965 - 978
  • [33] Minimum Hop vs. Minimum Edge Based Multicast Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
    Meghanathan, Natarajan
    ADVANCES IN WIRELESS, MOBILE NETWORKS AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 154 : 1 - 10
  • [34] A mobile reinforcement test: Traditional vs. constrained
    Deman, D
    Angulo-Kinzler, RM
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 23 : S55 - S56
  • [35] Mobile Application Development: Web vs. Native
    Charland, Andre
    Leroux, Brain
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2011, 54 (05) : 49 - 53
  • [36] Swiping vs. Scrolling in Mobile Shopping Applications
    Choi, Ben C. F.
    Kirshner, Samuel N.
    Wu, Yi
    HCI IN BUSINESS, GOVERNMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONS: ECOMMERCE AND INNOVATION, PT I, 2016, 9751 : 177 - 188
  • [37] Clearance vs. tolerance for mobile overconstrained mechanisms
    Rameau, Jean-Francois
    Serre, Philippe
    Moinet, Mireille
    MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2019, 136 : 284 - 306
  • [38] Search Costs vs. User Satisfaction on Mobile
    Verma, Manisha
    Yilmaz, Emine
    ADVANCES IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, ECIR 2017, 2017, 10193 : 698 - 704
  • [39] Randomness vs. Time in Anonymous Networks
    Seidel, Jochen
    Uitto, Jara
    Wattenhofer, Roger
    DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING (DISC 2015), 2015, 9363 : 263 - 275
  • [40] Robustness vs. efficiency in sensor networks
    Zhang, X
    Wicker, SB
    2005 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION PROCESSING IN SENSOR NETWORKS, 2005, : 225 - 230