RELAP5-3D validation studies based on the High Temperature Test facility

被引:0
|
作者
Kile, Robert F. [1 ,2 ]
Epiney, Aaron S. [2 ]
Brown, Nicholas R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID USA
关键词
Gas-cooled reactor; Thermal hydraulics; Benchmark; Reactor safety; HTTF; Validation; RELAP5-3D; HTTR; BENCHMARK;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113401
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In the spring and summer of 2019, experiments were conducted at the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) that form the basis of an upcoming high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) thermal hydraulics (T/H) benchmark. HTTF is an integral effects test facility for HTGR T/H modeling validation. This paper presents RELAP5-3D models of two of those experiments: PG-27, a pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC); and PG-29, a depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC). These models used the RELAP5-3D model of HTTF originally developed by Paul Bayless as a starting point. The sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification code, RAVEN was used to perform calibration studies for the steady-state portion of PG-27. We developed four PG-27 calibrations based on steady-state conditions. These calibrations all used an effective thermal conductivity equal to 36 % of the measured thermal conductivity, but they differed with respect to the frictional pressure drops and radial conduction models. These models all captured the trends in steady-state temperature distributions and transient temperature behavior well. All four calibrations show room for improvement in predicting the transient temperature rise. The smallest error in temperature rise during the transient was a 21 % underprediction, and the largest was a 48 % underprediction. The errors in transient temperature rise are largely a result of a mismatch in power density between the RELAP5-3D model and the experiment due to the location of active heater rods along the boundary between heat structures in the model. The best of these calibrations was applied to PG-29 to model the DCC. Once again, temperatures during the transient were underpredicted but trends in temperature were captured. The RELAP5-3D model captured trends in the data but could not reproduce measured temperatures exactly. This result is not attributed to deficiencies in the experimental data or to RELAP5-3D itself. Rather, this result likely arises due to the some of the assumptions and decisions made when the RELAP5-3D model was first developed, prior to the execution of HTTF experiments. An agreement in prediction of temperature trends but challenges reproducing HTTF temperatures within measurement uncertainty is consistent with previous analyses of HTTF in the literature. Future RELAP5-3D validation activities centered around HTTF may be able to provide greater insight into the code's capabilities for HTGR modeling with a more finely nodalized model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental study of a natural circulation loop and RELAP5-3D analysis
    Bertani, C.
    Falcone, N.
    Bersano, A.
    Azzarone, A.
    De Salve, M.
    Panella, B.
    37TH UIT HEAT TRANSFER CONFERENCE, 2020, 1599
  • [32] VVER-1000 model assessment using RELAP5-3D
    Popov, EL
    Yoder, GL
    Velichkov, V
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 149 (03) : 304 - 308
  • [33] A coupled RELAP5-3D/CFD methodology with a proof-of-principle calculation
    Aumiller, DL
    Tomlinson, ET
    Bauer, RC
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2001, 205 (1-2) : 83 - 90
  • [34] Comparison of MYRRHA RELAP5 MOD 3.3 and RELAP5-3D Models on Steady State and PLOF Transient
    Castelliti, D.
    Hamidouche, T.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 193 (01) : 36 - 46
  • [35] Transient Safety Analysis of a Transportable Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor Using RELAP5-3D
    Wang, Chenglong
    Sun, Kaichao
    Hu, Lin-wen
    Zhang, Dalin
    Tian, Wenxi
    Qiu, Suizheng
    Su, G. H.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 198 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [36] Qualification of RELAP5-3D code condensation model against full-scale PERSEO Test 9
    Bersano, A.
    Falcone, N.
    Bertani, C.
    De Salve, M.
    Meloni, P.
    Mascari, F.
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 139
  • [37] Modeling of void, fast power and graphite temperature reactivity coefficients measurements for the validation of RELAP5-3D RBMK-1500 reactor model
    Uspuras, E
    Kaliatka, A
    Bubelis, E
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2004, 232 (01) : 29 - 45
  • [38] RELAP5-3D ANALYSIS OF EBR-II SHUTDOWN HEAT REMOVAL TEST SHRT-17
    De Luca, Domenico
    Petruzzi, Alessandro
    Cherubini, Marco
    Parrinello, Valeria
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2016, VOL 3, 2016,
  • [39] A generic semi-implicit coupling methodology for use in RELAP5-3D©
    Weaver, WL
    Tomlinson, ET
    Aumiller, DL
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2002, 211 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [40] RELAP5-3D ANALYSIS OF OECD-NEA/NRC BFBT BENCHMARK
    Kovtonyuk, Andriy
    Petruzzi, Alessandro
    Parisi, Carlo
    D'Auria, Francesco
    ICONE16: PROCEEDING OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2008, VOL 3, 2008, : 849 - 857